cause) was i.uV-i'."»n in the next p bv order of - w-nor, > is deli i' *d in the memorial. I will fur-lie.- '> "an order fremibe Seep" v to «lr. I.D "lic'f i*d W another printer, under >7o. o. th i \vV .I>• nt - >of every part of m v cm \u-\ , re- nv return from Tellicherry, to be in r er °d in his p«per, he was 1 * interdicted from pubb'hi it, by th- a ; iig governor's order, and *hat while the pt-efs .vas i thus (hut again It , \ 'he iron hand of def- i potic power, it was l"f' open to my adversaries to abuse and vilify me as thev p' --l'ed, und :- a certain knowledge that I neither could judify mvfelf, or expose affertions. It was this principle that prevented me, while I remained in India, from ever finding an oppor tunity-os the statement with the vou- , . cher's that now appear, and when* 1 left it, the lame system being pursued, Mr. Paddock was emboldened to publish the piece on the hearing of Mr. Taylor's cause. The veil has been now withdrawn, which covered the falfehoods con tained in this piece or faandalous calumny, and it now ftands'exp'f.-d in all its crooked defor- j micy, as th£ production of a man. whose very existence depended on his being able to accom pliill my deltru&ion, and whose motives there fore for vilifying nv character in this produc tion, must be ielf-evident to every one ; It there fore now only remains to (hew, what proof he brought forward againit me, in iupport of his info mvioo; having, I flatter mylelf, al rea ly pro> p I, that his piece, refpefting the asser tions ot tie Counsel on the purchase of the Fe rokiabnd paze g > 1 Is, and the other matters they b- night forward, contain not even the (hadow of truth. The memorial further dates, that after every effort used to prevent it, I-left Bombay on the 2oth January, 1792, in the Raymond Eall-lndia ship. Captain Sired ley, having been obliged, contrary to the laws of England, to swear to matters that might have crimin red m felf; I r I was obliged to arfwer interrogatories on oath, whether J had no' made the faliV. fictitious, and exce'Uve charges Mr. Paddock befievt and c ctiled weve made in my accounts, article h ay tie'e, 1 iblemnly swore, wjlhout hesitation, I had rot. In the courle of the paflage to England, the | Raymond put into the C?pe of Good Hope for refrefhmen-% while there,'he AAing Governor, Mr. ('arnegi (who was alio a pufl'enger with me) being taken violently ill with a complaint that threatened a speed termination of his exigence, called me up in the middle, of the nigh: to his assistance! Hardly as I had been oppreiTed by this man, when in the plenitude of his power, , to him, and afforded him the fame aid 1 should have done to my ijear eli relative, in the lile Gtaat ion, he was for foire rime in imminent danger, but recovered, and he was so sensible of the injustice he hid heaped-upon me, that laying, as he fuppoled, upon his death-bed, h<* made a solemn declara tion that " he had \>t n milled and mifinformed, 44 which had criiied those steps to be taken " againit me, but that he was then sensible, I •• had been an injured man." This declaration he deTired miglu be communicated to me, as will appear by accompanying aftidav t, under No 9, whioh I delivered to tfce court of Direc tors, in London on the ltd August, from Doftcr Underwood the surgeon of the Raymond, (now on the Madras establishment) and Mr. George Corfellw, a civilian on the Bombay efta blilhment, v. here, he now is, and then also a paflengcr with mc. On this declaration no other reman: is necessary, as it mult speak home to the iVelings of every mar , than that, it very clearly CupporTs and accords with Colonel Hart ley's testimonies in favour, as to my conduit while I was comnuflfary to the army under his command, and is another confutation of the j malicious assertions brought forward by the [ counsel at the hearing of Mr. Taylor's cause. On the 15th Augult t7?2, I presented my me- j morial to the court of Dire&ors in London and j the refuh of the complaint I had preferred in ! that memorial against Mr. Paddock, was, that the firlt ships which failed for Bombay, carried orders for his difmifTion from the service, the orders arrived in Bombay towards the end of j and he soon afterwards died suddenly a vitftim to his own chagrin, malevolence and badness of heart. I It will appear by Mr. Anderfon's letter to me, I under Ko. io, dated Bombay, Bth January, 1795, j that to the very I3.it moment, the fame difpofi- 1 tion to oppress me prevailed as in the 6rlt in stance, and that the letter will {hew that after my departure from Bombay, and previous to the hearing of the cause, Mr. Anderfon moved the Cbavrt for tbe production of the following pa pers, and that t'e same counsel \vho made the j cbfervations publiihed on the hearing of Mr. > Taylor's cause, opposed the motion. These papers were, Col. Hartley's letter to Government, requeftirg j an investigation of his accounts, (my accounts.) | Government orders to the military board, in conftqiience. and their report. The minires of council, exonerating Col Hart ley from the fevei al items, carried to his debit I • by their order until his accounts had been j finally audited. A cop / of the papers furnifhed to Col. Hartley I by authority of government, from the Aud tor-General's office. 1 The report of the Military Board was, that j these charges did not appear »o them either frau dulent or fictitious, bui all vouched in the belt ! manner poflible. The board therefore recom mended the whole of the debits to be remitted Col. Hartiey ; The govei nment approved this recommenda- ; tion, and pronffunced his public exoneration, on | their own records,and in public military orders. Col Hartley's Ivtter to Government was to V.:e ,v that his deviation ftom tbe government jnflnidions, to him, as to the fvflem of expen- ' v court, by ordering the produ&ion of these the fir ft Ihip and speak to Ken*, and Co. about ft s, were in com pleat pofTeflion of fafls, to making oath to the testimonies given you.—With .v the prosecution against me, to be totally regard to the purchase of the property at Fero juft. Yet* by the majority of one voice, they kiabad, yofl certainly consulted me previous to fufed to quash the suit, on the motion of my \ your complying with the request of the gentle 'olicitor. And it will further appear by that! men, who made the purchase in the name of le'ter that the Suit, was then heard on its gene- Moofa, to ait for them and which I consented to, a! merits, and that after my accounts had un- for ailing as they have done, I rauft refer you the ltri&eft scrutiny, that malice could to them for their reasons. Reynolds is to have ! invent, not a single item, was proved, or a court martial. lam ready to declare upon oath, ' deemed by the court, either falfe, iidtitious or at any time when cj led upon, that at the time exceflive, nor was it proved, that I had in any I approved the offer in the name of Moofa. I shape imposed upon Colonel Hartley, but tHe considered it as perfectly fair and just, in conle tuit brought against me was diirnilfed with Coils, quence of which 1 approved it, and I have neve ML-; -^.VV 6 * 1 ' • of he diiVerrnt in -' ncntionta by rhe counsel, will, 1 d i »iot not. i" hem ia a very diih rent point of View, than .hey ippe-jr when di Ported and 'not nlv.b- their misrepresentations, but by" their ialieh ods. One of -he couufel, Mr. Caflan, had be, a a pettyr>g??ng attorney (nnt a coun 'felloe) at Calcutta, f>r manv years from vsbence be ran a~ u.7 hi the night from b{s bail, whom he left to oav his deb's, his charafter was notorious, for taking fees from both parties, and it was well knc-.vn, he was frequently bribed, to betra his clients, mone , he refused from ho one, as he had no character lose. The other party Mr. Hall, had likewise been obliged to get to Bombay fr Benga', his charafter was some what more refpeotable than that of his col league's, but there w,as not much to chute b?- tweeA them —Reproach had never been coupled with, ®r sullied my name, for I had always enjoyed a reputation in point of abilities and in-egritv. equal to any civilian on the Bora ha establishment, and was looked upon, as one of the rising young men of the lervice: ill these mifcreaits were hired to do the dirty buiii t Mr. Paddock, and af.er the documents I have i brought forward, 1 hope the foregoing will no: be deemed, as founding my own praiie, for I have o her testimonials 1 c >uld shew equally honorable to me, as those I have produced, In deed, I have a pride in faying, I had in three different initances, before i was. appointed com miffiary to Cdlonel Hartley's ariny, received Public thanks for my conduft in the fitua ions I had filled, and copies of thele testimonials I will at anv time shew to anv gentleman of relpe&a bilitv as I have previously mentioned. I cannot couclude without noticing, that the malicious purposes for which this Publication was anonymoully republished, "by rcqueit, at Philadelphia, Co far, from my place of rep- 1 dence, cannot be mistaken by any one ; bin as the author has chosen o be anonymou . i- rich (hall he be considered, his views being exavfHy the lame as those that influenced \^r -1 Paddock and the counsel in the remarks vliey I made at Bombay after I lad returned *o lv.iglar.dj like those men, he nevefr expelled 'hen* pu bliCa- I tion would be answered, and like tho& men, he i has descended to misrepresentation, to fabrica | tion and to falfehood in order to gain his ends, i but the fame fate awaits him, that befel his pro i totype, Mr. Paddock. —He will find his falie hoods detected, his artifices unmasked, and his j whole train of deception, fraud, perjury and colluiioh ft and exposed 'o open daylight; they v.-ill not n»u.ch longer (belter bin or his mil deeds, but diveited of the flimfy covering they 1 have hitharto worn, the piercing eye of ' flrfy, W|l l h-rlfl.hjj.il mini" !>-»-«—'•* ion, sls. rrrrm, i-rffoi,i no l.Lws »»• uld bind, who mocked, defbif'd and repeatedlv violated the J fa ictity of oaths when i hev interfered with his ▼iews, who has been disgraced for his conduft as an officer, at the head of the line of an army, and whose bcit friend and benefactor, has driven him from under his roof, and not permitted him to pu: his foOt over the threlhold of his door, from the turpitude attached to his name, and then will other matters be brought forward, which will prove him as equally 1 oit to all sense of shame, as to every principle of honor, and i with the' aflurance that these matters shall be brought fulty home to him, I will take my leave of the anonymous author for theprefent, with a rcquell, that the public will excuie me, for thus obtruding- on ihem, wish the affairs of an indi- j vidual, who has now no other wifn, than to live in retirement? but who has been obliged to ome forward, before them, in defence of his ehara&er. I am Sir, 1 Your Obedient Servant, ' 3AM, RAY. | j No. I. I Cannanore, $d August, 1791. De'ar Ray, ■ ! I have received your letters inclosing me n copy I of a bill exhibited againll you in the mayor's court, j for certain overcharges made by jfou, when aft- j ing as coramiflary under my command, and you ! and vou requelt I vLll write a letter to the Gover- j I nor in council, to CQjrQ-adidl the aflertions made j 1 by the attornies,_>HSat vou had imposed on me by I | procuring my signature to those accounts with- j j out a thorough examination. In anfver to that part of your letter, I can- J not give the Governor in council, a stronger tes timony than what I have rlready dove, by my approval and signature appearing on the face of them. It is much easier for the attornies to as- I fert, than to support their afiertions by proof, j and it is an absurdity to suppose tlfey can cblige you to answer interrogatories upon oath, to prove to them, that your accounts are unjuftand unfair. ] They alledge against your accounts, that many ' articles are overcharged above the market price, | and that other articled charged have not been 1 iffimt. With regard to "the prices, ,yon have j J only to coftrpatc -them wjth fimihir articles pur- ! j chafed bv the committee at the period alluded to, j ixed allowances of government will determine ! Paddock, had, tooii after the Colonel's arrival me he ifnes. j ferwl a sett of charges ijgSinft Mr.vßav, which They further Tav, that the bills were not pro- ; concerned, at be alledged, hU conduct "as Cori jerly vouched, as they had no; been lent to the miliary to the detachment Nov- day- at the in tommittee for examination, before they were stance of Colonel Hartley, Mr. Kav and Mr. ipproved cf by me: The atron-.ies cither rii.l Paddock were brought under a Iblcmn ertt**! n<« know my orders from gcvevnment or had ment before Mr. Powney the Madras rcfident" forgot them, iiic'.ofed is an e\trad. that the djfpdte Ibould ceal'e, on Mr Paddock's '1 he governor will proceed to Bombay, by the maki..g what was deemed a prcpei concession firft velTel, 1 shall certainly talk to him on the and Mr. Paddock withdrew th? above mentioned fubjeft before he goes. 1 cannot publicly write charges, iie> Ui ii.g them u,founded, iu a public to t'.ie board until 'heir proceedings are ollicial- letter to Oi ■.:• to quit the army without ;icqja ; nt ; ng yon, that he has ditcharged his du-y wi h the- in oft commendable zeal and li.'ll r., ind'.-ed, everv part of his public and p.ivau- conduvl has deicrvedl;. m«rt my ii• icereit approha'ion —and lie has in every ihape proved hinlelf worthy the high choraAer, you gave me of him, previous to my leaving Fombav—As one of his b. .* f.-i'-nds, I am lure this will give you p!:ifure, i.ideed, nothing but the very un pit-ui' iv. si he is reduced to. by Mr. I'ad i'Uc ha\ in*- hnn so much injury, in both traducing his public and private reputation, could have indue* 1 me to have contented to his leaving his c<~ mrrii'.faryfhip—which he has at tended to, nuch to the company's intcreil, his own honor, and my entire fatisfaftion. I am Dear Sir, I £r V»nrs mrf^ I ***'} JA s - HARTLEY. No. IV. The following i* a cop/ of part of a fetter I wrote from camp BlUapatam, 2oth February I 1791. In compliant with a request of Mr. Ray, that he might be Enabled to contradiS, with proper fellimoniesj some assertions derogatory j to his honor and ouragr, as 1 have real'on to believe this letter fcas never reached Mr. Ray, 1 1 now think it necelftry to transmit whiat follows for public infpeftiot, feting that the conduft of this gentleman on tie occaiion my letter related to has been tnoft wifarJor.ubly misrepresented, in a paper, William Paddock, in the Gazette of the 13th April. "Sometime in Augiif last, 1 called* on Mr. Ray at his house in Co'chh, and to furprize 1 found him preparing to rilent a gross inl'ult he had about half an hour Wore received from Mr. j Paddock, Captain Craufoid had promised to at- I j tend him on the occafion,and had jult gone out ! to fettle some previous buinefs. A few minutes : after 1 had called,-Mr. R»* received a note from 1 J Captain Crauford, wheren this gentlemen of- I fered loine realnns reJoaJi-ng himfelf—for de- ' I cliningL iLe rr)t hv Had -»ny"t j then jiikpH me to perform ttie office Captain Irau j f'o:-d had declined, the Inlult Mr. Padriock had ; given, and Mr. Ray's determination so refem it j I appeared so great, that, as much xs 1 wifhtd to I do it, yet I did notice ap-iffibility of succeeding ' in any proposal of accommodation, I might ' make to Mr. Rav, and therefore undertook at ; j his request, to writft a letter for him to Mr. ' ; Paddock, demanding-immediate fatisfaSion for | the insult, this I did accordingly, 1 was then I under lbme engagement to go out of tows, and j I made this an insurmountable excuse to Mr. Ray j I for leaving him for an hour, that I might when I alone receive Mr. Paddoc'c's answer, in which ! Mr. Paddock declined fighting, but had no ob jeftion to an accommodation, which wai what I I wanted, on which, I wrote to Mr. Paddock j again, and this brought about an engagement, ' that he and I Ihould have a meeting in the even- ' i"g,. in order to bring about an accommodation if p ffible, v. hich 1 did without Mr. Rav's know- : . but I afterwards went to him thinking it j pn per be fliculd lie acquainted with what 1 had done On my return for 'his purpose, I found thfi' Colonel Hartley and his family had come to j Cochin, from can'oriniems and th'-it Mr. Ray's ! impatience had excited him to wait no lonprr I for nie, but to l'crd to fSpatTiTHawkec in orHer Itogo to Mr. Paddock, on'the errand 1 had nn- j dcrtakc.i.—l at this time also found, that M i—j '..x.— ,t. . Hawkti ail d Captain Crawford, and being alraok the fame as Doftor Ker's, it js not thought nec -eflary to piiblifh them, the .foregoing Will no doubt be fufiicient. . No. VII. COLONEL HARTLEY. Sir, Mr. Ray's accounts of charges, hiving under gone an explanation, since I preferred charges agaifcll him I beg leave to inform you, they were j unfounded, and now appear f*tisfa«Qry to me therefore it is niv «arne.t wi(h to withdraw those .charges I exhibited againd .he Connniffarv's ac : counts 1 request you will permit me to"do so likewise the letters 1 addressed vou r,f the i o th a id -,oth instant, and if there Ihould be any un guarded expression in them, which mav be turn ed into diireipefi towards you, I beg you will 's, canlider it altogether uuin e-. iona). I aifure vou ' upon my word of honor, that nothing further I in this bu fine Is either publickly or privately will be brought forward by me. I have the honor to be,' Sir, Your molt Obedt. humble fern Cvcbm, \uh7 , Augutt 17 jo. 5 WILLIAM PAD DOCK.. «• "nkjr' ~y> --mr No. via. Mil. I. D. RICHAKDSO -". Sir, I have it in command from the Hon. the Act ing Govtrnor m Council, to acquaint you, it is his pleasure, you do not insert in yaur paper, any publication from Mr. James Ray, on any pretence whatever. I am Sir, Your Obedient Servant, Bombay Cos-") WILLIAM PAGE, SECT. tie, i7ji. 5 [/ am not certain tie above is word for word, fat it i.: the substance of what Mr. Richardson fur nuhed vie No. IX. James Ray, la'e Commiffliry to the foutheni detachment of the army in the F.aft Indies, com manded by Lieutenant Colonel Jam-s Hartley— lohn Underwood, Surgeon of the ftiip. Raymond in,the service of the honorable United com panv of Merchants of England, trading to the East Indies, and George Corfellis, a paliengei ton board the said Ihip Raymond on her late i voyage from Rombsv to London, fevcraHy and I each for himfelf make oath as follows. To wit. ift. The deponent James Ray, lor i himfelf depofeth and fai-h, that on the twelfth day of Mav lalt past, being then at the cape of I Good Hope, on his paflage to England, and be ing lodged in the fame house with David Car negie Esq. late acting Governor at Rombav, the fald David Carnegie was taken violently ill with a complaint that threatened a speedy termination of his evidence, that he can Ted this deponent to be called up in the middle of the night and re quested his afliftance, and no medical aid being at hand, and the said David Carnegie, being ; labouring under an agony of pain, this depo- , nent took such fleps, as he thought most likely ! to procure him relief, which fortunately proved fuccefsful, until the arrival of the deponent Jphn Underwood, whom this deponent lent for*fex prefs on this occasion, to fall'e bay about twenty miles from the cape—And the deponent John Underwood, for himfelf depofeth and faith, that being sent for express by the said deponent James Ray to False bay aforefaid in order to come to the afliftance of the said David Carnegie, upon this deponents arrival at the said Cape, he j attended and administered to the said David C%r- I negie accordingly, and that during his inter- i cOHrfe with the said David Carnegie on that oc casion, the said David Carnegie acknowledged to him, this deponent. •' That he did not expefl to receive any civili ty from Mr. Ray (the other deponent") after the , part, he the said David Carnegie " had taken | agsinft him at Bombay, where he had afled from j misinformation and which had been deceived, • occasioned the steps that had been pursued against j Mr. Ray, being resolved on in council, but, that he, (the said David Carnegie) was then sensible ; that the said Mr. Kay was an injured man" or ! words to that effeft, and *he said David Carnegie I at the fame time requested that this deponent weuld communicate to ttie said James Ray, such his declaration and acknowledgment, avowing j i that he had not the confidence to mention it him- I felf to the said James Ray after what had passed , between them.—And the deponent George Cor fellis for himfelf depofeth and laid, thai lie alio , was at the cape of Oood Hope, time the occurrences aforefaid took pUce that he was prelent when the deponent John Underwood J communicated to the deponent James Ray, the before mentioned declaration and acknowledg ment of the fait] T)avid Carnegie, and that he the said Davit® Carnegie, during his aforefaid illness a«?, prior to the arrival of the said John UndefTvood from False bay, had in the presence °f 'nim (this deponent) expreiled himfelf to the , f'ame effeft as heretofore recited, with refpeA to • fe^±gh , Ztfe'r^--\ i |'l MS W&tr injury uune mm mereo) —an wmcn tne laia ae .ponents, each speaking for himfelf only, declare to he true, the whole truth and nothing; but tl>e j truth, as God shall help them refpeflively. All three rworn thit Signed, linddavof August JAMFS RAY, 1792, before me in JOHN UNDERWOOD, London, GEORGE CORSELLIS. J. BOYDF.LL. In the pretence of. JOHN MITCHELL, Nntdry Pullic. Delivered to the court of Dire&ors, 33*1 Augoft, 17y3. J. a AY. No. X. Dear Sir, A very {hort time before mv receipt of yayr favor of 3d June your cause with the com pany had been brought by. the mayor's court to hearing and judgment—Prerious however to that, 1 had thought it for your interest to have produced certain l documents in the pofleifion of the plaintifts, which 1 conceived would give the death stroke to the a&ion. I accordingly peti tioned the court for their production, viz. Colonel Hartley's letter to government, requift ing an investigation of Lit, (and your) ac counts. Government orders to the military, in soufe querice, and their report. The minutes of council exonerating Colonel Hartley frcm the several items, carried to his debit by their order until his accounts had been finally audited-—And a copy of the pa pers furniftied by authority of government to t olonel Hartley, from tue Auditor-general's oitice. The plaintiffs roqu?fted to (hew cause, by their council at the bar against the produ&ion of these papers, and were accordingly heard, but with no efl'ec*, the papers-were produced and read "n evi lence at the hearing. ■ • < - <• -rt - My realons for wishing the production of theft papers were, because the bill ftateri ihe fuiril clain-ed frrra you, were not rnly in manv re tpeftsexceffive but were in othere altogether frau dulent and fiftiticus, as they flood charged in your accounts, and if neither, excessive, frau dulent or fifiitious they were incurred contrary to the rule prescribed in vour inilruilions. The report of the military board, was, that these charge? did not appear to hem ei;lier frau dulent or fiMtious but all vouched in the best manner pojfible, the board therefore recommend ed the whole of the debts to be remitted Colonel Hartley, which the governmen* approved, and pronounced hi*' public exoneration on their own records and in public military Orders., Colonel Hartley's letter above mentioned was to (hew that his deviation from this government. inLruilion, to him, as to the fyilerti of expendi ture, was not only unavoidable but for the .good of the public service, in which government hear tily concurred, and declared, that he had per formed the service with honor to his employers and glory to himfelf. I was therefore in hopes that these public docu ments, would have laved me the trouble of go ing into the general merits of the acftiop Be cause I argued, if the plaintiffs from subsequent and better information were of opinion the charges in your accounts were neither fraudu lent or fi&itiojs and that the deviation from their i, ructions was Proper and for the good of the l'-'rvice, they coufefl'ed they had no juit cause of action against you, independent of the circum itance prevtoufly proven, in the course of the pleadings, that they had accounted Hartley tinal y reipohCMe, by direfting your accounts to be v. • • ■ , , v.*-*: returned tr Viir», and to debit himfelf therewith, and moreover, as Hartley must, as commander in chief, have been the sole cause of the deviation, the suit was more properly direfted against him, than you, at lealt, that the bill defective for want of him as a party. The court however, by the majority of one voice, were for determining the cafe on its ge neral merits, the more especially, as the counsel for the plaintiffs, urged, and strongly iiififted, that the moll material part of the bill, charged you with imposition on Hartley, i n causing him to believe, that the charges were for articles •aflually received and paid for, when the very reverse was the cafe, and therefore if it could be eilablilhed by evidence, you was bound in your own person, and by force of your covenants to make reparation. I had in the end the good fortiinfc to find j that not otic of the articles, charged againll you by the plaintiffs was proved or deemed by the court either falfe or fi&iaious. or that you had by any means impoied on Col. Hartley and the bill was difmifled with coftg" 1 am dear, Sir, your moll obedient servant, JAMES ANDERSON. Bombay, Bth January, 179 J. James Ra.y, Esq. w—— noticeT A PERSON V\7"HO will do any kind of business, either VV as a Labourer, an Accountjnt, a Jierk, an A ffiitant in a School, rtr any occupitnn by which" he jean make a living— wants employ ment. lie is a but aflc, no wages till J earned, and i» willing to forfeit any he may earn in caic he does not fully fatUfy any person ; who may honor him with employment. | +Jt A PPIy «No 58 North Seventh street, j near Cherry alley, or to the Printer-hereaC ! January ANY Person or Persons, wilhing to avail therafelves of any epportunity of hiving a person well calculated to perform the -nectflary avocation of a DUM, wi.l hear of on«, hy loving ' a lii.e at the Office of this Gazette, directed to A. B. Any recommendation* neteflary can be giveni dtf January 22. (0* THE COMMITTEES Appointed by the several Fire Companies in the City and Liberties, to devise a plan of nflociation for the purpafe of acting in efl«- rert at fires are reqiiefted to attend a me'tirg to be held at Cameron'; Tavern, sign of the Golden Swan, in Third above Arch Street, on-Saturday 6«ninff the ift of Fe brcaryt precifcjy rt'6 o'clock. January a?. dtS. « r ~ HENRY BENBRIDGE BPGS lea re to inform his friends and the pwMic, that he has commenced thebuhnefs of a BROKER, at hn Office No. 83 Dock fl'tet near the Rank of the United States, where he buy* and fells or Commission all kinds of Public Securities, Stocks, Notes, icc. &c. and offers his services in any bnfioefs in his line. Jan 14. diw3aw6w THE UNDERSIGNED, . IS Swedilh Majesty's Consul General, and an _i tKnuaod to tfrrr Buftnefs, or hi? Majeftv the King of Denmaalt in the United itatei of America, refilling at Philadelphia, Hereby gives public Notice, That in t'i recewt in&iuitions received from hi« government, it i« thedu'y of all Ma'tert ot SwcJith and Danilh vtffcls, before their Jailing Irom »ny port in the laid States, to calLupor'him or the Vice COiiftil. in order to he granted such C\rriticat«< tor rl t-ir Cargoes, which the ci/gcncy of the (late of thr N«utral Conuiv ree and (he fe- i v j r 1 Detn'en nf the Liilligerent Power?, renter indifpei'Tably necessary, and, that any Matter of veffeJs belonging to the refpeiSiTe nations, or na vigating uvuit-r the p-nteilion o! their fl.igs, in oraittirg to - such certificates, will personally fta;id r.-iposlibk lor the confcr)ucnce«. RICHARD SODERSTROM. Philadelphia, 18th December, 1799. United Slates, iff Peunjjlvnru* Dlfirttt, J . Notice is hereby given, 'jpH a Special BiftriA Court of the United State« will be holdsn at the City Hall, in the city of Philadelphia, in and for ths Pennfylvar.il di(lrii3, on Fri ;»y tho jifl day of January uiftant, at ten o'clock AM. for the trial of an information filed by William Rawle, Esq. attorney of the Uuited Sutc« in an-1 for the fiid difirifi, against 1 Caflc, and 3 Hogsheads Spirits, diftillod at a diftil'.ary within the city of Philadel phia, and removed Irom the fame without being firft branded or marked according to law—where fore the fame have been seized as ferfeited. By order of court, D. CALDWELL, Clerk Dirt. Court. January 18, :Bco. CITY OF WASHINGTON. TBF. POSSESSORS OF OBLIGATIONS «r CER MFICATES fill ed Ly the fnl-,fcril»er, 'or undivided Shares or Lots on hi. purchrifc within the city of Wafting ton, who have not y«t applied for and received their Deeds, are hereby notified, that their feveraJ TitWwrl be duly completed to the order of those who in conformity with the terms of the laid Cer tificates, do make the Payments in full therefor, either to Tbumas M'Eutn \S" Co. or to the fcriber at Philadiflphia, on or at any tine before the 31ft day of vlay Best. Samuel Blodget. December 17 VALUABLE REAL ESTATE. / TOR SALE About 25 acres cf Land, LAYING on the east fide of the Falls Road.— On the East it is bounded by property belong ing to Mr. Tench Francis, f«n —on the south, ky a road »i two perches, and on the north by a lane, which separates it from Mr. M'Call. It is propo sed to divide this land into 3 equal parts in order to (nit the puichalcr*. Alio, 31 acres, fit >ated on the weft fiiie ®f Gcrn.antown rmd, adjoining Mafter»'s eftatc, bfine part «t" ths property of the lat« Samuel Mifflin. Pertersnt apply to Samuel Mifflin, corner o£ Market and nth llreeta. Jar.uary 14 - ' I ... :?■ *