of t\)Z Mnitefc States, AND Philadelphia Daily Advertiser: ( By John Fen no, N 0- iio Che [nut Street. NvmmZ - {TMM« XIII. * PHILADELPHIA, T TOESPAY EVENING. April 3. Philadelphia, March 30th 1798. LETTER 11. To the mouse of representatives of the UNITED STATfcS. '' ■ I Q.KNTLSMEN t MJUfn the legislature of a great and free jwopk is convened atau ireportantand threat ening crisis we naturally expert from it foitte uHQoirirtion prute&ion, to their rights and li bei ties. If we are deceived, and instead of great exerlious for security, a (hameful neglect of t | »verj ordinary means takes place ; vvc are m to enquire the cause of such desertion of A duty 5 the mind is uneasy if it cannot 11 aiSx a proportionate apology. Perh.ips It may be thought too bold if I publicly declare my opinion ; but as lam w sincere I scorn to fupprefa the inclination— It is tha lirft privilege in a free government w to speak your mind ; it iq a privilege I glory e: in and which I (hall now exert; truth un- ° d*r whatever fignatute loses nana of its force it carries cofivi&ion tp king and peasant. w I conceal not my name from fear ®f pan- A ifliment > for I mean not to violate any one fc Vw of my country; I «fpe& and revere 0 them and-it is for their prefervatian I write. " Why Ido not disclose mjrfelf is to avoid "j personalities which would unavoidably hap- j pen and thus divert the attention from the fc main ohjedt of these letters. e< The aid which the French government P gave to America in her contest with En- P glandwas repaid on oiirpart (andjuftly too) j with esteem and gratitude ; from that period there has subsisted a mutual attachment ; f- c and the revolution which has just been ef- n fe£ted there, joined to the brilliant fuccels tl that has conllantly attended their arms ; has T ' heightened this attachment (in the breads of a large poition of our citj-z-ens-) to the a , wioft extravagant enthufiafnv. t> This growing affection was observed by 1) tJjfi French republic with peculiar fatisfadli- it cn— they were too cunning not to take adr ventage of it. Dazz-led by the splendor of P th«ir victories and the novelty of the scene, which a sudden change from one extreme to w another rjjuft produce—a change by which e tjbc ahfolnte government of twenty-four « millions of people is wrested from one man n and divided anvmgft themselves ; they yield- 1' ed up the-control of tbe passions and indulg ed ill all the excefles ps vice and folly—for 1 their follies an apology from the impartial ls and thinking roan can soon be obtained. Qh ! guard their rights ! defend'their dig- o nitvl-lwffle the villainous confp;racies of ;t your prollitute.d colleagues. _ j ' Tl»e smiles of an approving conscience Iwill be your revvard —the hearts of a gene rpus pepp'c w!n evi;r witb g ratitude > and your names will (land rtcor4ed in the h ;< mials of hiAory " tlw arm defenders of the ! " oeople'* rights." - n P 6 EUGENICS. From American Daily Adveatissr.. Meflfrs. Cla vpoole, r The following very interesting letter from Mr. | Webster, of New-York, to his friend in thiscity, is sent 10 you for publication, by ® cor.ient of the author. It conta. s infor:r 1 tion upon the origin and nattir»t)f cialigua. t fevers, thai is worthy of the notice of e«ry f legiflatorand merchant in the tlnited States, j , • Mr. Webster's discoveries upon this fub jeftare entitled lothe more refpeel, as they . are the result of invelligations unfettered by _ previous theories in medicine. —He writes ' as a philosopher, and hisfole objects appear t to be the health and lives of hi« fellow citi- r zens, and the prosperity sf his country. ] Nrw-Tcn-ij March 20, 1798. | SINCE issuing proposals for publilhing my Enquiry into the Origin as Epidemic Dif- ' . eases, 1, find many people have the impression : that this work is t.v'jc a revision and enlarge- s ment of the Letters which I publilhed Taft ; : Autumn on the fubjedt of the Yellow Fever. ( It is necelftry to impreffion from . the public mind. The work proposed is al- ' together new; tho a few of the facts and con- 1 clufions llated in my printed letters will be I ' wrought into the intended volume. 1 The'tpieftion to be decided, is not simply , what are the origin and phenomena of the dif- ( • ease which lias alarmed and scourged our cities ; | but what is the reason why malignant or pesti lential diseases prevail at fooie times more than ' at others ? If the cause is imported infection, 1 why is infection imported into all ports of ; ■ America in one season, or in one period of : four or five years, and the* for a long series . of years, is not imported at *ll ? Are malig nant epidemics confuted to fMrtfcular" -places j or countries; or are they pr<- in many ' or mod parts ef th 4 world at the arae time? " If so, and we find that'they spring up in dif '■ ferent parts of the world at the fame time, communication by infection cannot be the t principal cause, and we must resort to # other principles. , I hinted at this circumstance in my printed letters, but was not then prepared to discuss ' 4he (object. I have however ascertained the faft, that epidemic diseases usually appear in many or mod parts of the civilized world at the fame time, and not only on land, but on the ocean, and on the opposite fide of the globe.—lt is equally ascertained, as I- suspec ted from my own oblervation, that violent and dellruftive epidemics are aliuerrs preceded by diseases of a less malignant type, and near ly in the order in which they have prevailed in the United' States, viz. Catarrh, anginas, bilious remittents of encreafed malignity or • petunial fevers, yellow fever, or plague. This progress or fotnething similar is obfervjble of all the great pestilences that have ravaged the world. The ta£ts to prove this principle in epidemics, and the order of them, will be so elearly ascertained, as to render it impossible not to forefee the approach of a peltilential period. From this fail, will be deduced mod fatiS fa£tory explanations of some points which now , occalion controversy among medical men. It is alfodemonftrafed beyond all controversy or doubt, and I polTefs full evidence of tfre fcrtt, that when any great pedilence is laying-waste those countries mod obnoxious to it, as Ca:ro or Conftantiriople, the mortality is augmented in all parts of Europe. But this is not all ; the influence of the pestilential (late of the armofphere, which,in Grand Cairo, produces 1 plague, produces in America some malignant 1 disease which swells our bill, of mortality. e Ido not speak of llight plagues which pre - vail in the Levant cities almoCt yearly, from • the dperation of powerful /ocalcmiCes ; but of „ those great and general plagues which in the I course of every period of twenty or thirty years, carry oft' thousands in a d(»y. in Cairo and Conftautinople, and often extend to more 3 healthful citjes. So uniform is this pheno -0 menon, that give me correct bills of mortaili . ty for the principal cities in Europe and Ame e rica, ( and I can tell when a dedruiitive plagua has ravaged the Levan., without one particle r of other intelligence of the fact.—The fame dreadful plague 111 Egypt in,1736, which car - ried off several thousands in a day ip Grand n Cairo, was cotemporary with that dedruflive s fore throat in America, which our old people e (till men'ion with horror.--The yellow feveV j ofi74i in Philadelphia, and of 174.3 in New- York, c'orrefpond in time with another gene s ral pedilence which ravaged the Levant ci -5 ties. The fame was the vy\ith the yellow 1- fever of 1761 or 2in Philadelphia, which was s during the great plague of'which Riiffel I has n given so particular an accpunt. At the fame time the bills of mortality in London were = fwelied tVorti the u(ua ; number of about 20,00* 0 and in 1740, to 30,000. The lad ' .epidemic under which we are yet smarting, a and which lam afraid is not yet at an end, n tho evidently lighter than many that have happened within two centuries, has been felt ' in the Weft-Indies, South America, on the African coast, and our unhappy countrymen, who have been.prifoncrs fn/Vlgiers, can wit " ness forme that its eft'eclshave been fatally ex f periencedin thut country. ' Why tliefe great andintereding e have been nearly overlooked and disregarded, i- while rulers of nations have been busy in com bating the importation ofpe.dilence in bags of cotton and old rags, i 3 to me aftoli;{hing.<— p But it is often.the dediny of man to overlook r the mod obvious thing. II » ' " The .primary causes of general psdiience, it maybe difficult toafcertain; but I have no n helitation in faying, that it must be an alter '> ation in the chemical properties of air. It is clearly demonstrated bv evidence in my pol y fellion, that changes of season are not" adequate .. canfes ; for the worlt plagues-have broken out in high northern latitudes, in tlie- wdft of winter. The season* have material influence on the general ltate of health ; and local.causes haye s still nioreinfluenceiner&rarjaptnmxial diseases. " 13ut it will he made clear that some more pow erful caule is always combined with these fnb - ordinate ones, in producing the more general f and malignant epidemics. What this cause ij 1 will not. undertake to decide. The question has. hi tho to baffled enquiry; but there are e hopes that some light will tie thrown on tbi, " part of the.frbje^. ■ This enquiry is extremely inler.cding to the c happiness and prosperity cf our country ; and c j ) 10 p c to find a fubfeription Aaf wi\f indem nify me for th e labor and expence I must incur in prosecuting it. NEW-YORK, March 27. : The author of the refidenee in France, 1 now publifhiwg by a Mr. Davis, and who is ] said to be a lady, has a very happy talent at 1 dcfcribing the (cents th«c took plsce in j France, as well as the characters of the ac- 1 tcrs. The following description of the dif- i ferent charaitera of th« Fuench and Englii , £ is extremely just and «xa<3. !,( " The conduct of Fouquier Tinrille,Jiai j t led m'e to some refleftions on a subject which! 1 I know the French consider as matter of 1 triumph, and as a peculiar advantage their national character enjoys over the Eugli(h—} I mean that smoothness of manner, and ' guardednefe of expreflion which they call' " amiable," and which they have the facul- ( ty of attaining and preserving diftinft from j J 1 a correspondent temper of the mind. It 1 j accompanies them through the moll irritat-11 ing vicissitudes, and enables them to deceive ! 1 even without deceit, for though this suavity 1 is habitual, of course frequently undefign- ■ ing, the dranger is nevertheless thrown off ( his guard by iti and tempted to place confi- j dence, or expedl fervicea, which a less con- ; ' ciliating deportment would not have suggest ed. A Frenchman may be an unkind huf ' band, a severe parent, or an arrogant inaf , ter, yet never contrast his features or afpi , rate his voice, and for this reafoh is, in the ; f national sense, "un homme bien doux."— i His heart may become corrupt, his priaci -5 plas immoral, and his temper feroeiotii; yet he (hall retain his equability «f tone and , complacent phraseology, and be "un hom ' me bien amiable. The revolution has tended much to deve > lope this peculiarity of the French charac : ter. Fouquier Tinvillc was a man ps gen r tie exterior. Gouthon, the execrable affoci -1 ciats of Robefpirre, was mildness itfelf.— 3 Robespierre's harangues are in a stile of : didinguifhed sensibility, and even Carrier, 1 the destroyer of 30,000 inhabitants of 1 Nantz, is attested by his fellow students, to J have been of an amiable difyofition. I know a man of mod insinuating address, who has t been the means of conducing his own bro- I ther to the guillotine. The philophic Con - dorcet pursued his patron, the Due de la Rochefoucault, with malignancy, and Col ' lot d' Herbois dispatched at one discharge of s eannon three hundred people together, to f " spare his sensibility," the ta(k of execu e tion in detail. II Without deciding whether the Englilh 3 are more geatle in nature than the French, 'j lam persuaded this douceur of the French is no proof of the contrary. An Englishman is seldom out of humor, without proclaim- ing it to the world ; and the mod forcible t motives of interest or expediency, cannot r always pre*iil on hira to assume a more en- V" g»ginjr cxtcrmd than thee which dclirn-ates e his feelings. If he has a matter to refufe, 1 he usually begins by fortifying himfelfwith a little ruggtdnefs of manner, by way of e prefacing a denial. " The hows and whens s of life" corrugate his features and difharmo t nize his periods, " contradi&ion fours and paflion ruffles him." . It is this difference of charafter which has " a prodigious influence ever the political fuc -1 cess of the two nations. If aA Englishman y has designs upon you, his manners tell of o |he plot—and the dratagem carries with it e its own defeat. If he means to dp you a - favor he does it with such an ill grace, tfct - it is a chance you do not thank him for it. e the fame in his manner, whether to do you e a favor or to plunder you—the fame civility of manners, the fame ease of deportment d and fafciiiating smile, introduce the proposed e fchejcc ; and even after he is dete&ed jr. y a villainous trick, you are so pleased with his . address ; as to almod furgive him." LONDON, Nov. 20. ~ There is no nation that eqaah the Eritifh iS for strength of charaiter—no nation so ca s pable to contend with adversity. The pre e sumption of France, in imagining that it ri e vals Rome, is only ta be surpassed by the * falfehood of the supposition. The Frencl* possess a degree of enthusiasm, that has a i' splendid outside, but falls very (hort of that e equanimity which characterized the Romans: It The proof of genuine courage, is the for le titude with which it fudains a reverse of '» fortune. It is that unlhaken condancy " which animated that great people, at a time when Harmbal befieg&l t!leir very gates, that taught them even in that extremity, | t to despise the conqueror, and abfointely to fell the ground oft which he-had encamped >f his army. Fear was a dranger to their foul*. - Are the French such a nation ? Let but a k battle or a dratagem fail, and where is this Roman resolution? Have tbey not fled like !t hunted dags, before armies of Germans, 0 inferior, both in numbers and difcipliiie ? j s Again, the Romans were a magnanimous . and a generous people. Do the French re e femble them in this ? On the contrary, are it jiot all their victories tarnished with wanton 'f and deliberate cruelty. Of this, both the Rhine and Italy supply abundant examples. e Victorious only by dint of numbers, they 0 are cruel by inclination. Their piratical de- predations on the feaa, and the cowardice . they display in evety engagement, are in il conteftible proofs' that their pretended valor is is that of barbarians, who trud in multitudes n to crush and ovirwhelm difcipliue. h What the Frenchmen are not, the Bri. tifh are—a manly, persevering courage, e e qually undilmaycd by adversity, and nnin d toxicated by success, is their condant dif _ position. It is this temper of pur idanden (t that makes us so terrible to our Gallican neighbors, who, vast as their territory is, and numberless as their armies appear to be, , are yet incapable of approaching onr coast. i Nor will they dare to anncry ns, though au : hundred diredtors inltead of five (hould prompt them to the enterprize. While the ■ lioa lives, though wpunded, and a prisoner in his deo, he is ilill the lord of the son ft ; , i and though the wolves may howl rouut' his l.cave, the sturdy beatt still lfr«ps then at t 1 ; bay by his well known reputation : a eou-' , . rage uufobdued by accidcntj and expiring t ~ only with life. .PICTURE 'OF PARIS } (FROM 4 FRVNCH JOURNAL.) [ ' If you are fond as dancing, you, may l ave a- hundance of it. In every quarter ynu will find • j a plate, where y«u may enjoy this aClive amtjfe ' i mcnt. Are vnu so admirer of plays ? Paris of- j ; | tcrs you at ksit thirty Theatres. 'I hey ait no - j longer, it is true the fine pieces of Racine or : Voltaiie ; but yftu may fee plenty of new r pieces, which are lorgpttfn th;* next* day. Are you given to play ? You will SnJ in Paris abun r dance of tables, and wh" \vil! cheat you them. Ar.- yoit tempted to the en joyment of the fox Paris with fair - frail-onei; there sre at ieaft tACi.ty for ona - ' when CHajjmittk profetihege, and finp as if were at the-Opera. —If you like to frequent reading rooms a»d acadebiies, Paris has more than for m#*ly ft mrifhed in At hem —Are vojr fond of readi»g? We no ld;iger, indeed, fia! « hook:,bur we translate ahundal't'y. Scarecty il» r. » dark, - gloomy, horrible romance iflu: from th« Preis [. in Loadon, before twenty drudges set to v. ork _ toclothit in a forryFrenchdreff y FOR SJLE—by the Subscriber j ie Two Lots of Ground, s > Situate on the fauth fide of Chefnut-flreet, be- T, tween Second and ~\ hird flretfts :—one containing o eighteen seer. and the 6ther fevtnte 11 feet, more or d lefs,'on tlw said street, and both extending, thej fame one hundred and forty-eight, more' or Jess, to Carter's alley. a There are, on Chefnut-ftreet, two two-story is BRICK HOUSES e (Numbers 8p and'Bs) !, Which may readily be made feto one ; and, or, Carter's alley, there is a convenient, well built ls three-story .. Brick House and Kitchen, Almost new, which has two rooms on a floor n arrtJ , a . frpnt of eighteen feet on said alley. J prorerty is clear of ground-r«nt, and an; ie inaifputah'e title will be given to the pyrchafer. 3. The-three Houfcs will fepk'fately or toffC y t|jcr. parficuiJirs may hx kftbwn ort apjjtict tion to •' ZACHARIAH POULSOJt, jbh. No. 20, Chtcfuui-fireet, or at the Library. >r match **> frffgw A Negro Boy for iale. f-T' 9 ahout i 5 VMri old, und ha* about 15 , year'; to hivif j i":.n bonsd until he -- 11 28 year# old, uij»rv(foei» of ih 4 - vlayor of this l- City and Mr. f homas Harrifon. He is botii ac -- r *ve anj^mif.hitvous, but incapable of becoming r j a very u,t !ul boy with a "nailer that v.-otif.' injmc aiately fopori«tert(! hi-, t ~ For further par tiruiars avfif ta the I'ciu: £ her.-ai. » ai.trci ii. , CONGRESS. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. CALL UPON THE PRESIDENT. t) „ ~ JcO Friday, March 30. ( GwclwlcJ fr«m ycjlcrdjy s Gazette. J Mr. Li vinC stow said, . there appeared to be two objections to going into a cottwsHttta of the whole on the state of the union ; feme thirllfcrthepropofition before it i&of too 1 rifling a nature to con/lime time ; others, that it i» of {0 great magnitude, that they wj/h to gain farther information, and to ha"ve time to con sider it.' Tbe firft class of gentlemen, he thought, treated a fubjetl, confefiTedly of «reat iiuportarce, with too much levity—■' Gentlemen fay yoti do us wrong, when you place the question before the committee in the light of a Peace or War question; we have no idea of going to war. This was the language of the'gentleman from New-Humpfliire (Mr. Gordon) particularly. . Had that gentle man forgotten what had been said by his elo quent friend from Malfachufetts (Mr. Sew all) who fits belide him ? That gentleman had declared, not that war might be expect ed, but that ?w'ar exists ! Was it unreafona bVe, after fuel)'a declaration, to come to a re folutioo which fays that it is not'fcxpedienf * to resort to war at this time ? He thought the welfare of the country required it. But th 4 gentleman from Massachusetts did not (lop here. Though, he said, a defepfive war was all ne vvifhed for, under our present circum ftanoes, yet he invoked the Supreme Being, and wiflied we were in a situation to carry on an otfenfivt war. Yes, exclaimed Mr. L. the God of Peace Aas iuvokci in favotifr Of War; the God of Mercy was called uptyi to favour a war ofvengeance ! And yet gen tlemen iVifhto throw an odium upoothofewho cOme forward with a prupofition for pe,>ce. Mr. L. said, he wiflied as much as any member for further information before the house proceeded in active measures ; but lie was far from being certain that complete in formation could be obtained ; he believed great oppofhioh Would be made to the call ; in the next place, if called for, he believed the information would not be lent, he supposed this from a former refufal madeoll the ground of Executive authority. He deprecated the decision ; but he believed, as precedent would authorize it, it would be made. Mr. Rutledge thought gentlemen went much too far on this occasion, in anticipat ing, notfonly what would be the proceedings of this house, but also of the President. He rose immediately after the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Baldwin). That gentleman'# arguments went against a postponement gene rally, but not against a postponement till Mon day. That gentleman was furpriled that gen tlemen Ihould wish for a postponement ; he , was one of those who excited his surprise. He was in favour of the postponement of this question, because the last had been postponed. He thought the motion for a call of papers ought to have been pafled ; but not having . palled, ha wished it to pass before the house , went into committee on the proposition which : had undergone some difcuflion, especially as he did not believe the delay would postpone the final decision upon it. 'if gentlemen would agree to pal's over the firft proposition, and gu 011 to the next, which relates to measures for the defence of the country, he fliould be as . ready as tliem to go into a committee of. the whole on the state of the Union. He doubted not the gentleman from Virginia was anxious to deliver the speech which he had promised 1 to the committee [Mr. Nicholas informed the gentleman he would hear 110 speech from him to-day].- Mr. R. hoped, then, he would not ~ object to the postponement. The gentleman from Pennsylvania, said he wanted noMufor j mation. Nor did he himfelfwant it. He h ; id received a letter from France, which convin ced him of the perilous situation in which we flood with that country ; he had fee 11 the h rench decree ; and he had seen a gazette which had informed him that the mefTa-e of the Directory was paired unanimoufiy by the Council of Five Hundred; but he supposed , some other gentlemen had not fufficient in formation, orelfe it would not have been caill ed for ; and surely gentlemen would not call fucli to vote upon what they deemed to be a "* question of war or peace, without it. Gentlemen had (aid, that the message of the President had produced a belief that we (hall be involved in war, and that produce had fa I len accordingly. He did not believe the fall was owing to the message, but that it was the effeCt of the decree ; and asked whether the President Would not have been criminal if he had fuffered the drfpatches to have (lent 1 ; night upon his table ? He certainly would' the communication was indispensable ' Mr. Sew at l was sorry to differ in opinion from his friend front S. Carolina. He was himfelf against the postponement. This dif ference, he supposed, arose from that iran's yielding to the assertion of gemlemen that the question before the committee of the queftion of war or peace, which he himfe.f did not. He neter confide red th« •qneftion in that light. It comes in as a bar to any measures being taken for the defence of ■our country, or from getting into business, ; j which really concerns the state of the union • what were the motives of gentlemen for 'bringing it thus in, he could not tell The readiness of gentlemen to come to a decision upon the question without farther information proves that they do not consider it as a quef' tion of war or peace. 11 cannot be doubted" that it the was called upon tode" clare war against any nation, they would Inve aright to expeft that every fact relative to that nation should be laid before them. The gentleman from New Yoric, Mr. S said, had thought fit to (ritude to hint as an' pealing to the God of Mercy to support us in a vindictive war. Pwn'.llwnent, Mr. S. f ; ,; c | was sometimes the triteft mercy ; and if the ■United States could inflict pimifhment on 'France, it might be mercv to that country And cou\4 any American citizen consider the fufforings which the French Republic had •brought upon our merchants, our Teamen and upon our country generally, without ca'llmlr •upon the God of Mercy to enable us to in flict punilhmen? upon that country ? When gentlemen fay (ann none (eenitodeny it)that l'Vancc has given this country ju/t caule ot war, will they not f.iv France has g lV en us jn(t catife of v-ngeance ' And is there, said he a patriot in this House,[who acknowledges France hus given us jult cause of war, and who does not wish to infliCt that war ur o i that country m trhe Jeverefi and fuliea man-