NEW Trit 3 TRE. THE M»a»gcs deem it tbcji t© info'm the Public. *h»t he tntcMnnmrn i 6' the Theitrr are un avoidably fn(p-nri f d 'till Mftid'y ncx', m conlequence •f i|»r tfnfottunttf indi'pofiuon «' s condadt, thev esn make no r-mark « | this lime, ««the vi«'atio» of his contrast is the fubj«t of a fuis, now depending in theSunreme Coort: and in relation to Mr. Frn»ei:, they are content, *t pref eot, 10 r.hferve, that, independent,of the sood faith whirk engiprments ought to infptre, the. liberali ty that he has hjthe-teexptneitced fiom the managers, s> well as from the public, had na ura!ly taifed an ex peftatioa, that he wnnld not u»f»ra>efully have taken td-antige of the e«tftinj#ate ofth- Theatre, either to eicbarrals tne former, or to obftrutt the amulemenu of (he Tatter • The Managers, having thus refpci&folly rcpre fenttd the re*l cause of the poftpenemeiat of their Entertainments (an event equally unexpeft ed and prejudicial) cannot avoid adverting to the difficulty of executing, with universal appro bation, so ardupas a talk as that which they have undertaken j but they folemnlydeelare that in every department of their duty towards the public, and in all their trat fad ions with the performer, their incefftnt effyrt-has been to give fatisfadion ; and ■ndrr this declaration they »nxioofly hops that they fball experienop favor and terpretation of their eo«du .*798- PROPOSALS By Arondt Van Hook, Froj ; *or of the Rfj»< njr Roo*i ; For Publishing by Subfsription, An Appeal to Impartial Posterity, Br Madame Roland ; Wife of ihe Miniifer of the Interior in France. CONDITIONS. These fearce ix,d very valuableHiftorical Mr moirs, (which ran through two Lordor. edi tion! in a few monthi,) will be comprifad i« » vols. OiSlavo, of 4CC pag« each. They will fce printed rn fine p»per and a new type, and delivered to Subfcriters, neatly bound ind lettered, at I dollar and jo eenta per vr.l ume—-one third of the Subscription money tobe paid rn delivery of the firft volume—the*rt maindrr when tie work iscompleat. To Trintera, Bookfellet?, and others, who acquire Subscriptions, the usual allowance will be made. Subfcriptiens are taken at the Ueading- Room, No. 149, Water ftreef— the Printing office, 14,, Pearl-fire»t —and at the different Beoklioret in New-Y»rk - Also, by William Young, corner < f Serorvd and Chefnyt flreet, nd the Editor cftffe Ga«(le of the United States. Philadelphia. , As soon at a fufficient number of Sul lcriberi are obtained, the work will be put to preft, ard (otnpleated with the uttioft difpstch. Feb. 10. eoflam Twenty Dollars Reward, FCR taVirg up a runaway fcrvant Girk named Abigail Miller, latt- riy calling herfclf Dctfey Smith, and fending her toNorth Front-ftrcet, No >he is of a chonky make, and v»ry dark complexion, with round features, and black bufny hair; pr«bahly n.uch altered by pairt and pow deri, as ihe is luppofed to }e fc creted in houses of ill fame, though no more tijan fifteen years of age. etbtmzry 19. co2w CONGRESS. J HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. 1 V WEDNESDAY —FEBRUARY 21. ■ < Mr VtnV.li, from the committee to whom was referred tht amendm nt> of tha tenate to tk< bill , appropriating a (uu> of mouey for holding a treaty ' with the !nd;'tnt, their title to land is I the (late of Tenacffea ot North Carolina, nade a J report, recommtsiding an agreement to all the a- 3 mendments, except oat, to which they recom mended a dlfagrctmeat. The amendments agreed C to related to Jlriking out the dates of Tcuacfiee and North Carolina, leaving the diredien to eke Pr fident of the Uaited States, in general terms to t hold sack treaty or treaties with the Indians (with- ( eat mentioning any particular tribo) as he Ihall think proper. The amcridaoent which the com mittee recommended to be diifented from, was in ' the following words : v t " Provided nothing contained, in this aft stall J be conflrued to admit an oblipa'ion on the part of the United States to extingailh for the benefit of any Nate, or individual citixen, Indian claims to 1 any ljnds lying withia the ttrriUry of tha United * States." ! This ameldniFHt produced a debate which lifted [ the greater part of the day. It was opposed by Mifirs. W. Claibornr, Nicholas, Venable, 8. 1 Smi'h, R Williams M'Bowcll, Oallatia, and Macoa, on the ground of its being a new thing to ' iatrodace such a clause iato a biM of this kiad ; I that the bill was compete without it, and tkat to agree to this amendment would amount to adeni J al of the claim againd the United States of the pt titieners from the state of Tenref-e and Otht rs,to * an extinguilhmeut ef the Indian title to their lands, wLich they were fitisfied was well founded, and a c denial of which wruld be eqaally unjail aad im- ( politic ; that it would be bell to kt this qaeflion remain untouched for the present, leaving it to the President to afl it he (hall fee proper ; as if c the petitioners and others had » cki r, the amend- 1 mcnt proposed eouldnot take it away ; it could therefore, have no other cfifeil than a bad one, sit , might, an.l it was believed would be considered as a declaration igiinfl all pcrfons who had claims cf : this kind agsiinlt the Un'ted States ; that the per- ' sons who would be affeclcd by such a dedaraticn were very numerous; that those who had been t drivm from off their lands in the state of Tenacf a fee, and who had in e »fe latin, Gillefpie, Grove, Harrifon, Havens, Holmes, fonts, Livitigfton, Locke, Lyon, Machir, Macon, M'Clenachan, M'Dowell, Nicholas, I* Parker, Rvtt kdge, Skinner, S. Smith, W. Smith, Stanford, Sumpter, A. Trigg, J. Trigg, Varnnm, Venable, R. Williams.—46. NAYS. Meflrs. Allen, Baer, Bartlett, Bayard, Brookes, Buliock, Champlin, Chapman, Cochran, Coit, Craik, Dana, Dent, E vans, A. Tofter, D. Foster, Glenn, Good rich. Gordon, Gregg, Grifwold, Hanna, Harp, r, Hartley, Heifter, Hindman, Hol mer, Irniiy, Kittera, Lyman, Matthews, Morrjs, Otis, Reed, Schureman, Sewall, Shepard, Sinnicklon, Sitgreaven, N. Smith, Sfiraguc, Thatcher, Thomas, Thompson, Tillinghaft, Van Alen, Wadfwortb, J. Williams.—4B. The report of the feleft committee hay ing been negatived, the question was now u pon agreeing to the amendment itfelf. Mr. Bayard moved to amend the amend ment, by linking out the word territory and inserting the words " limits of the United States," which moiion was carried 47 to 41. The question on the amendment was then put and carried 47 to 46. Mr. S. Smith called up for decision the resolution which he laid upoa the table the other day, for obtaining from the colleflors of the fevtral ports of the United States a statement of veflels captured or detained fcy foreign ■ nations, belonging to the Uuitcd States since the id July, 1795. Mr. J. Williams doubted whether the col lectors could give the information required. Mr. S. Smith believed they could. The Senate he said. had adopted a resolution of a fimiiar purport with this, but he did not think it fufficiently particular, which was the reason of his introducing this. Mr. Gordon did not fee any neceflity for adupting this rtfolution, since the Senate had already pafled one of a fimiiar tendency. Mr. Thatcher was in favour of the re solution ; butdidnetthink it went farenough back. Mr. J. William* moved to ftrikc out the ift July, 1795, in order to '"krt "f">"the ratif taticn of the Britijh Treaty." Mr. S. Smith thought the ift July, 1795 a proper period ; but if the gentleman fram ' Maflachufetts would bring forward a propo 'f fition to have aftatement from the commerce ment of the European war, he should not ob jett to !{. Many attempts had heretofore been obtain a correft lift sf .captures but it had never been cJFcfted. The lalf fef- I Con an imperfeft account was laid before the house collefted from newspapers ; he belie ved the ceurfe now proposed would produce more fatisfaftian than had yet been «.btained on this head. Mr. Thatcher moved that the statement should commence from the ill •of Oftober, 1792, when neutral vefTels were firft. ltopped in the ports of England, a period which whs a few months previous to the breaking ,out of the war betwixt France and England. Mr. S- Smith consented to this alteration Mr. Harper moved to ftriTte out the ift of Oftober 1792, for the purpose of inser ting " from the ratification ef the Briti/h treaty." He did not fee why the House (hould a(k for a long- (lory of captures since the year The iibjeft required wis* a simple one, and lay within a much narrower eoripaf-j. Tt was merely to obtain a come parative ftatenient ofcapturesmadeby Franc and England within a certain period. To take the account so far back, would only serve te ret-®i the enquiry, without being of any real uft. • The question was put on this amendment and negatived, there being only *3 voted in favor of it. The question then recurred on the resolu tion as amended by Mr. Thatcher's piopo iition. Mr. Allen moved to add, " and so cause." He did not know that the propof ed enquiry, could be of any other use than to fatisfy curiosity ; but", if any part of it could be of use, he thought it would be well to have the cause of capture afiigned. Mr. Otis hoped this amendment would not obtain, as it would be very puzzling, indeed, to know for what cause our vessels had been despoiled and captured. Mr. J. Williams said, if it were to distinguish betwixt fa.r and illicit traders amongst the captures, he should be glad; but he feared this objeft could not be accom plished. Mr. Sitgreaves remarked, that thongh the colleftors could not in all cases, give J'.n answer to this enquiry, they might in some. Indeed, be did not know that they tould give the other information required, any more than .this, as he knew no mode by which they coyid get pofTeffion of it. If 1 they could not answer this enquiry, it would be easy for them to fay so. He hoped, therefore, it would be agreed to. The motion was put and negatived, there being only 26 votes in favour of is. The question was then taken on the reso lution, and carried, there being 58 votes in favour of it. Adjourned. ■ —— 1 ■ ' MIWWMIW— * PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATURE. House of Representatives. February to. _ Mr. Leib presented a petition from a number of the inhabitants of that part of the Northern Liberties, lying between Vine ftreet and Pegg's-run, and the river Dela ware and Sixth street, prayißg to be incor porated. Also, one from the managers and trustees of the school, near the Rifiug Sun tavern in the Northern Liberties, praying the grant of fix hundred dollars, to enable them to complete the house for the accommodation of the said institution. Mr. Everly presented a petitionfrom Hen ry Frayly, ftatiag that there are balances due him from the counties of Lancaster, Berks, Northampton and Montgomery, for drums, fifes and colours, furnifhed the mil itia of said counfies, and praying relief. The committee to whom was referred the petitions relative to the poor of Delaware county, reported in favour of the petition ers. A report in favour of the petition of Ed mund Milne, was read, and ordered to lie on the table. A report upon the petition of a number of the inhabitants of York county, praying for a division of the fame; in favour thereof was read, and ordered to lie on the table. The bill for railing by lattery a sum to defray the expences of erefting a fchool houfe in the Township of New-Hanover, in the connty of Montgomery, was considered by paragraphs, and ordered for a third r«a ding. The bill entitled, " An aft extending the powers of the Judges of the Supreme court of common Pleas,"' was considered and or dered* for a third reading. Adjourned. February 12. Mr. Sterret prefentcd a petition from a number of the inhabitants of Mifflin county praying pecusiary aid to Dickenfon college, which was read, and ordered to lie on the table. • Mr. W. Maclay presented a petition from a number of the inhabitants of Dau phin county, of a similar tenor to the above mentioned petition, which was read, and ordered to lie on the table. Mr. Bonnett presented a petition from a number of the inhabitants of Bedford county, of a similar tenor to the last men tioned petition, which was read, and order ed to lie on the table. Mr. Leib presented a petition from John Bioren and Patrick Madan, accompanied with a cofiy of their proposals for printing the laws of this commonwealth, and praying that a number of copies of the said work be fubferibed to for the use o£.the state, which was read. 1 Mr. Kelly presented a petition from a number of the inhabitants of the common wealth, stating that the aft to declare and regulate efcheata, is defeftive, and praying that a supplement may be pasTed to remedy the said defefts, which was read. 1 Mr. Wain presented a petition from a - number of the citizens of Philadelphia, - praying that the law would be made more - efifeftual for the prevention of vice and im e morality* which was read and referred to the members of the city, with inftruftions to report by bill or otherwise. Mr. Preston prefentcd a petition from s Philip Thomas, Hating thnt he 1 and proceeded to improve a traftof land on < Conewago Creek in Allegheny county, but before he had completed the said improve- i ment according to law, liis good intentions I were arretted by the lpfs of his fight, -which he fears will endanger his legal claim to the i said land, and therefore prays relief, which was r