t '" 4 • Twlxr for fiiip bulldftog, ( . Tar, pitch* ami rosin, | Cov»pc in fl\eets, Saris, hemp. Mid cordage, , / And every thing, which may serve direft !y or *inAirtßly to the armament and equip-' . meut of veflels, unwrought iron and fir planks excepted. Here also the treaty of 17 94 fe j.ves as the pretest to the e>xcutive direftory. But may it not be obfervfd, that these articles were always and generally refpefted as 0b ... 'iefts of contraband in time of war, when a fpecidl trenty, like ours with America, has not pronounced.a clear and formal, excepti on ? The British government has not, at a nv tim? admitted » similar exception. The 18th artick; of the treaty of 1794 has then innovated nothing in refpeft to these ; and therefore occasions no modification. Eng land acquires no new favour ; (he remains in the situation in which till then she never ceased to be ; and it may be asked how far the executive direftory has a right, without the intervention of vhe body, to place among the articles of contraband, mer chandize which an existing treaty has not placed there. The decree of the 12 th ventofe, still tra > cing the modifications which it supposes to exist, fays further : '• Every individual known to be an Ame rican, carrying a commiflion given by the enemies of Franc#, also every sailor of that nation making part of the crews of enemy veffcls, (hall be, on this account alone, de clared a pirate and treated as such, without being fuffered, in any cafe, to alkdge, that, he was forced to it by violence, menaces *>r _ ©therwife." The decree founds these provisions upon the 21 ft article of the treaty between Ame rica and England j but this article it similar to the aift Article of the treaty ps 1778 j and, in the one ai well 33 the other, it is merely stipulated, that tU« fubjeft or citi zen ofoneofthetwocontrafting parties, w'uo fhcllaccept any commifiion or letter of marque from a foreign power, to arm a vessel with intent to aft as a privateer against one of the contracting parties, (hall be considered and treated as a pirate. Neither of these two treaties extends the profeciition and penalty to other mariners of the refpeftive nations. I will not allow myfelf any other reflexi on upon this, than th?t such a provision is , barbarous. The 4th article of the decree of the 12th ventofe direfts the execution of the regula tions of tl\e 21ft of Oftober, 1794, and 26th July, 1778, with refpeft to Ameri can vessel*. It conCequentlv declares them to be good, prize, if they have not on board ... a role d'equipage in due form, such as is prescribed by the model annexed to the treaty of the 6th of February, 1778, the execution of which is direfted by the 25th ✓and 27th articles of the fame treaty. Without examining whether the particu lar regulations of France can fubjeft our al lies at home or on the open seas to observe the fbrznalit ies which they have not stipula ted for by treaties made with them ? With out examing whether the-7th article of the law of the 13th nivofe does not annul the provisions of these regulations, where they are contrary to the treaty of 1778,1 observe that the article is grounded upon an error. No model of a r6le d'equipage is annexed to the treaty of 1778 ; tfee 25th and 27th ar ticles do not even speak of it : the word is not even once contained in a single sentence of this long treaty. Never fiace its conclu- : fion was it demanded from the Americans ; every one knows their sailors are not classed- What end then (foes a role d'equipage an swer to them ? Before his departure, the j csptain merely presents and leaves a lift of the company he has, and upon this lift a passport is dtlivered to him. See its form at the end of the treaty } it supposes, it requires nothing more. 1 have run over the decree in all its de tails : let us now endeavour to colleft the general motives for it. The treaty of the 9th November, 1794, is evidently the motive of the conduft of the direftory. In the fupremc magistrates of a people I like this civic aoimofity, this, anxi ous and jealous zeal for the interests of the country: I even believe, that the American government has merited some just reproach es for treating with its firft enemy without communicating' the matter to its oldest friend. In the mean time let us also recol left ; that France had then no-longer a ma rine which could protest the commerce of the United States ; that the English were the maftm of every sea ; that anarchy de voured-our unhappy country ; and that at the epoch of the treaty, the Americans re mained ignorant that the 9th thermidur had finally driven guilt from its throne. Shall I add to these considerations a pic ture of the conduft of the French agent in the United States ? Hardly arrived in South Carolina, where he landed, he endeavoured to fowthe feeds of infurreAion and discord, ,to .make enrollments, to arm privateers: he went further; he gave those, whom he had thus armed ; he gave them, of his sole and full power, on the terytory of an inde pendent and free republic ; he gave them, commissions to seize the veflels of nations ••• with whom the Americans were at peace, to whom they were even allied. ' .Another minister plenipotentiary arrived t at Philadelphia in the month of June, 1795. He complained, that the treaty .of 1794 puts it out of the power of the United States to form conveniently a new commer cial alliance with the French republic. The American government answered by commu nicating the treaty itfelf: and observe that ,at that time it was not yet ratified ; it could not therefore be said to exist. Observe also, that these were not the only circumftariees which produced trie idea of this compaft between Great Britain and the United States : those who have attentively follow ed the courfc and progress of political [*' The words in italics .%/ not contained in tbttreaty cf 1794.] events, know that for several years its exist ence was forefeen dreaded. France and the United States had even expressly declared, in the preamble of the treaty of amity and commerce Concluded on the 6th of February, 1778, that they mutually re served the liberty of letting other nations, at their pleasure, participate in the fame advantages. I repeat it ; I am far from approving of the treaty of 1794 ; more courage and at tachment perhaps became these brave Ame ricans. But after all, us again view them still 3ffoeiated with a people without a marine, whocould neverthelefsably defend its alliesbyland.bfltnot uponthefeas; Scefpecial ly upon those diftnnt seas where the British veflels maintained an undisputed, undivided rule ; with a people without a government, delivered up to all the furies of anarchy and guilt : but finally, if the United States have violated the duties of decency and refpeft, they have violated no engagement, they heve usurped jio right ; they have only availed themfelvgs of the universal right of nations, to form contrasts when and how they please. Are we then the sovereigns of the world ? Are our allies then only our fubjefts, that they cannot make contrasts at their pleasure ? And truly, it is not a little lingular to hear the French govern ment alltdge the treaty of the 19th Nov. 1794, t0 bean aft of hostility, whilst they themfclves order all Americen veflels to be I captured, without having declared war. j yho docs not know, that since the com-' ; mencement of the sth year, a great num ;.ber of them have been confifcated .1 And almost all, the faft is remarkable, belonged ! to men known for their attachment to the I French. They have been taken with t))c < double violation of an alliance and of liof pitality : they have been taken in our very port?. But lately, an American captaifi was ioiprifoned at Bred, is not this to ■nwit thf reproach we so often 08ft. the Engli(h, of forgetting upon the seas all good faith, all juflice ? Even lawful re prisals could only authorize us to seize Bri ti(h property in American veflels ; but we take the veflel itfelf; and we even take the American property it contains ! Neverthe less, as was well observed a few years ago by the present vice-president of the United States, Mr. Jefferfon,.whofc sentiments to wards France are known, according to the law. of nations it cannot be doubted, that the property of a friend found on board the vessel of an enemy is free, and that at the fame time the property of an enemy found on board the veflel of a friend is lawful prize. America had to fear at firft, to have for enemies England, Holland, Spain, all then at war with France. In the midst of this universal struggle, would it then be criminal to preserve towards all an ufeful neutrality ? Is it not known, that in such a political situation, the neutral powers be come the maritime carriers fcr the powers at war ; for the latter (land in need of their own (hips and sailors for warfare. In another point of view, two courses pre sented themfrlven to France ; to receive suc cours from America, and to make ufeof her against England j or to permit an alliance to be formed between England and America. It is at firft view inconceivable, why the for mer (hould not obtain the preference, why we (hould lose the fucc#urs of an ally, why we (hould not give to our enemy one enemy more ; the fceblenefs however of the mari time succours which America might furnifli i us, rendered delusive, in the particular cafe, . the advantage which, in a general point of view, so agreeably presented itfelf. The ' other course, on the contrary, of placing j America between the two combatants, to | make of her, by her alliance with each of the two, a neutral power with refpeft to the other, would offer to us in the.United States (as an allied power, considered in relation to us,— as a neutral power, considered in rela tion to England who is contending with us) great facilities in navigation and commence. I am far from attaching to these reflefti ons the importance of a demonstrated truth j , I only present them as doubts : I merely wi(h that they may contribute, to bring the two countries-back to those principles of moderation and friendfhip, whieh will in crease their mutual strength : I wi(h that, by injurious bravados, unworthy of itfelf, the government may no more.alienate a peo ple whom we ought to cherift both for the good they-have done us and for t-he services we h* v e rendered them. We .complain of the Americans ; but has not Washington, in his last address to congress, solemnly con. tradifted those imputations so v3giie, so un certain ? We complain but wlist would have been our conduft and our language, if we had seen, a 6 in America, a foreign mi nister plenipotentiary begin to levy troops and fit out privateers without the permiflSon of the government ? We complain ; but are not the United States the firft pe»{sW\vho acknowledged our liberty ? Was it®o*?rodi them we feceived, in times of difficulty, (whatever ingratitude and bad faith may fay of them) those nourishing grains of jwhich we were in absolute want, and for which I "do not know whether they are yet paid ? Did not the legislature of Carolina very lately di rest to be paid- to us a sum which remained due to us, immediately and by preference, although this legislature was partly compo sed of the owners of (hips and goods which ivcnf just confifcated in the American seas by French veflels ? Behold also what was their conduft at the moment when they learned, that the' French government, deceived by its agents in the colonies, fuffered itfelf to be drawn into prejudices still more unjust. A new ambtiffador was suddenly difpatehed to the direftors of the republic. But to whom was this honorable mifSan confided ? Cir cumtlnnces required more imperio-ufly than eveV, a firm and decided friend of peace ?nd of France. America pofleffeda man, who, being a courageous defender of the liberty of his country, happy iuhaving contributed ,tp its birth and confolidatiou, always pre served for the people, whoft fuscous pro tested the acquiiition, an unalterable fenti aient of gratitude and affection ; a man, whom we can but little f lfpefit of predilec tion or favor for Great Britain, inasmuch as during the W3r of"American indepen dence, liis property in Carolina, where he lived, was evtr the firfl delivered .up to de vaflation and the flames. Returned to his fields, as soon as peace* w f concluded with the former oppressors of In's he lived afar swim all public cmplbyments ; and ' it whs there that he was fought for to be engaged as the mediator between two peo ple whom he' loved, and the peace-maker of America. -Complaints plight be made : these are the explanations he cam?, to ofler ; he carr.e to enlighten the French government concerning the conduct ofits agents, and their calumnious imputations call upon the Unit ed States ; he came to calci the animgfities, the noise of which menaced the repose /if the two worlds. He arrived ; -aod imnedir ately hewasorderedtoquitFrance.lt wis not Mr. Pinckney who was .rejected, btr. the government of which he was the muifttr and the organ (I ). And whilst the envoy of the United States, met with this humiliating reception, what was the conduit of the agents of the Direftoiy at St. Dora ngo towards them ? We may roikon among the benefits done uj hy the Airier tans, the liofpitalitv and relief afforded to our fugtrve coli nifts. This honorable testimony of attach ment and fenfibiiity is . not foreign from the fe ci motives of hatred which the present gorern , ors of our colonies bear to them- Head in the official journal of the Directory (ijPrairial, stii June) an extra ti.e p»odflce of pri?t». They .ificrt, that it b«*jr.e' their devo tion and pitriotifin not to rhetn'.'jlves on lcrount ol'.all the pjli!lr» infetfed the fe»« with priva teers 1 Tlii' agents wijo denominat* refpeil for treaties puftllanimtui 'perfjievi towards whom they violate' the public faith ; who decide, as it ptfTcff-.il of sovereign power, whether an altiiftee fel ffobfifts ; whether oe not it is reseflary toiler, into a state of w-,r ; whilst the direflory itCflf-poft-fTes not the light, without the will of thq aginti fay amounts to thi*—' having nothing wherewith tt> buy, f t:Ke Unstfd Stftjp, »nd had no contra band goo.'s on board njjjiilb r, afjer a lengthy dileuffiiß, but entirely grounded upon the l'ytlem Of th'-s dscretf r,f tl e litffe Vcntofc, the viciouf nefs and linceriflituttonsHty'of which I have de monstrated; die minister concedes with an ej preflion so aftiwiifhing that about it, even after ! have traofciibed jt_:let your goTcrcment break the Inconceivable treaty it conciuiicd on the, 19th Nov. 1794 with our mod implacable ene 'l) Read aifo the following , (.i)rci H.ny/ v itli the.decrec-s / tbe 14th and aSrh 'Mefiidoi;, shall be charged upon the captors in rift.- tb» •4 cargo » .taken j.swl "P sn tlw i-.emajndcr ofthe ■ cargo whei® cnly a Jiart 0- it is . njies ; then the French republic will cease tcr apply to ltfeif the pfoviSons of thiitreaty which favor Feg'and te its prejudice, and we ihall not [be them, t warrant you, cited licfrif - any tribunal to sup port anyunjuftpretenlions." Have T read it right ? Unjuji prttrnjnni ! h it ooflible, that they have been thus characterized by the very mi>ifter who is th.-ir ag-int and defender ? •Ah ! lay afidc yourjirtftn/iont. your m-naces, your difdjins. Do not occauon by your lnconfiderate proceedings the very you feat. Can Eng land defii'c liny better than enmity between France and }Tor t;?i A nerica. ? We thick ts avenge of the Eugliih.—we f.-rve them. Tn -x ---afpernte the United States ; is it not to carry back to GreaV Britain ? To mln the American com merce ; is it not to encreafe the British commerce ? Peace, peace is what the inturcft and Wants of alt prcfcr.be. Let in.'utiry every where reanimate it felf : let every i'ca be free. Smitten with conSa- . graticn and ravage, with a long ttexility, let our I colonies rife to public order, to agriculture, j to prosperity. fcet our confidence>n the Uhited j States be renewed, that it may renew their confi dence in us. Let the two worlds, witr.:;lies of our i fuccel's, also w'jr ess the facrifice of our refentmenjs, | even though legitimate. Riprefentatives of the i people, Dir9i*ors of the Republic, Frcnchnfen, all J 1 you who have beer, great in victory, be still greater ' in moderation and g-s-.rroCty. Let us dare, as we are all-conquirors, and merely becaufa we ate con querors, let us tlsre strongly to express a desire for universal peace, so/ peace even with that ancient ; rival, wbofe envoys are now about recommer.cing j the negotiations which have been ctxf long fufpeud ed. Lrt peace.be also restored to the interior of j our troubled country. Has not the empire-os sac- I tiotts, of hatred, of, veugeanfe, of crimes besn long enough protraSed. 1 do not knew liberry With fire bran<(» and poniards By means ef con- 1 vulfiens, you will e®ajette. . PHILADELPHIA, '* TUESDAY EVENING, September T 9 . CITY HOSPITAL REPORT, From the 18th to 19th Sept. in the morning. i Admitted, sinCe last report, ana Myers, Palms alley, South Front ft. m. Abbott, 21, Penn street [John Fletcher, Plumb street. Arnold Craigh, Spruce between 6th 8c 7th streets. Patrick Dougherty, Queen street. Letty Smith, 77 South Front street. SuCan Kirk, George's corner Plumb street. Benjamin Johnson, Ferry house, Market street wharf. Daniel M'Carter, Catharine street. Susan Brown, Mr. Bum's, Water street, near Drawbridge. Difcnarged since last Report. Wm. Cooper, admitted 15th inft. John Dempfey, I*l James Clark, 10 George Corbett, 11 Elizabeth M'Cabe, 8 Pat. Gallr.gher, 9 * Died, since last report, John Daly, admitted 16th. Elizabeth Schylt, admitted 14th Mory Maglone, ' 13 Benjamin Johnson, 3 hours after admifllon. Error in report of 16th to 17th, inltead of James Field, 'in report, of deaths, read William Fleming. Remaining last Report 47 Admitted since, 10 56 Discharged 6 Died 4 10 Remain inHofpital, | f 7 Five of whom are dangerous. Interred ink City -Hospital burying ground since last report : From the city andfuburbs 4 From the city hospital 4 Total 8 Stephen Gi*ard, (Signed) Caleb Lownes, John Con age was propelled'againftthe horse, which gxving him a start, he ran awaybroke the carriage to pieces and wounded the gentle man severely. A Turnpike is about to eftabliihed between Albany and Schenectady, and a fubfeription has been opened fijr railing fund*. The dillance is about 16 rtiiles. Several of the New York EditorsJfcm puzzled to account for the contradictory nature of the Intelligence received from the -Spani.'h frontiers. The fact is, that sundry letters of the'jth of June originality pirbli/h ---ed in Claypoolc's Daily Advertiicr contai:» details of certain tranfadions at the Natcher of the progress and result of which we pu'J lilhed an authentic account down to a math latci date near a month ago. See Gazette of the United States, Aug. 25. An Alexandria paper of the 14th contain# the following paragraph. At a late hour last evening, we received a communication from a gentleman whoi left the Natchez in the middle of Jsly; at which time there was no prospeCt of a spee dy settlement of the differences with the Spaniards, things remainiug in the famt state as at the date of our last authentic ac counts from that quarter. This communi cation is lengthy and interesting—it will be given in our next. * # " Nicms" in our next. GAZETTE MARIN $ LIST. Port of Phiiapblpvja. < * CLEARED, IBrig Prince Fr.:U f,ddar t \Sf. Thomas Sihr. fta Fletver, A nijtn iV'indfat Stoo6 Salty, ' >/ I }th. Ari.* Fty, Mt-jftU, li/ira Sloop Pu'ly Knight. *J ! ' l\lh, Stcop I stb, Scb. JFrictrJbip, Oil in, 8.. r'irfrtoil Sully, Rubtntfwt, Currituck Sleep Sa'ly. Albright. AUxartelria 18/£ ( Mrig T)e T autcire, Dunp'jy, Cape Ernvcnir Sc4- jtttJ ntwj, ( -.'l'', yew T-art Sloep-JDelpbin, Deify, Richmond A brijr and schooner, each with a figure head and yellow fides, arrived at the fort this morning, Names and place whence not yet ascertained, The schooner Flying Fish, Capt. Msx- ' well, from Jamaica, now at the fort, was brought to, a few days ftnee, by a gur from the French privateer now at anchor of* the Brandy wine. Capt. Maxwell h'iled from Hampton Roads, but this not fat'sfy ipg the Frenchman, he sent his boat, well manned, to overhaul the fchoonet's papers. Ik the mean time Capt. Maxwell fuf . ed himfelf to drift astern t>f the privateer, and, jirft as the boat was dropping alongside, he hoisted fail and made off. The privateer weighed anchor shortly after, but did not tliink proper to pursue. New Tori, Septemltr 18. ■ARRIVED, DAYS# B|ig Two Sifters, , Norfolk Schooner Ellice, Galloway, Richmond 8 Slpop Betsey, Elkins Baltimore ;Brig Triton is returned astir being out 7 d^yo—Captain being dead. Norfolk, Sept. IT. On Saturday last arrived the Fiota, Capt. Wm. Colley, in fix weeks frofn Liverpool—■ The (hip Flora, captain W- Colley fail ed from Liverpool the ?Bth July, in com pany* with the following vtJTeh : < f Ship Neutral'ty, Dawfon. For Norfolk, < Brig Eliza, M'Conijel. L Eliza Wrght, J a (per. f Ships Alex. Hamilton-! For Baltimore < Favwi, & Becket, Cun (_ ningham. For Philadelphia, the Ship Pigou, Sinclair. Left there. Ship Industry, Vickei"y, for Norfolk, to fail on the 10th or 12th August. Ship Planter, Driver, for City Point, to fail the ift of August. Ship Alknomac, Lemond, for George* Town, to fail the fame time. Ships Clothier, Gardner; and Seymour Willis; to fail for Philadelphia in a few days. Spoke. On the 21 ft August, in lat. 44, 20; long. 48, 30, the brig General Wayne, capt. Wells, 11 days from Bolton for Naples. Baltimore, September 16. ARRIVED. Ship James, M'Carthy, Rotterdam Montezuma, Chafe, London Brig Mercury, Miller, Hull Contential Gronwald, Halifax Betsey, Whitemalhl Bolton Sloop Polly, Gladding, Norfolk Mary, L'Hommedieu, New-York Green, New-Port Swift, Ballace, Currituck Schr. Hellcn, Tuycrofs, Bath William Love'l, Hill, Charleftom Diamond, Attwood, Stonington Arrived on Thursday last—brig Mercu ry, Miller, 45 days, from Hulk— Sch'r. Mary, of Alexandria, Evelette, 23 days from Kingtlon. Ship Jair.es, jo days from Roteerdam. Arrived yesterday—Brig Colombia, Rol lins, 84 days from Galway, with 144 pa f fengers, all in good health. July nth, spoke ship Ritfon, for Norfolk to London, lat. 45, 28, long. 28. 30th, spoke fliip Elizabeth, of New-York, from Savannah I to Liverpool, out 11 day*, lat. 38, long, j66 t . . Mr. L AIL? ON, WITH nri insertion to render service, and unde ceive those Performers, who during his abfrnce Mr, has thcuuht proper to eog a £ e > thinks ic would be wrong in him not to inform those that are engaged, th?t it Is wirhoir his approhafion, aud that he will not he in any way anfwetabl- for Mr. Jaymond*B engagements. PHILIPPE LAILSQN. 'r'-a x