%St 0a s'ettc- PHIL 4 DEL PHI A, /ifftffort OJtce, 6th Sept. 1797. Sir, tn .compliance with orders received by the this day, you are hereby required to hold in hradins 3 to trlarch at a mmnent's warning, the fifth, fisth, seVenth and eighth classes df the eoni'pntiies composing your regiment, in order to form the body of 817 men from the brigade of tbis city; and as soon as possible inform me of your proceeding, that I may filake my report to his excellency the com tr.ander in chief. lam &c. LEWIS NICOLAS, Infpeftor. Inform me of the number of notices your / regiment will require, and theyfltjll be hilhed without delay. C<»l. Gur!jev, or Officers 1 Commanding the jtb regiment. j The Commiflioners appointed by the Governor, to carry into efte& the law fcr alleviating the diftrefa of the Citizens of Phi ladeiphia, and the niburbs thereof; inform tlieir fellow-citizens, that they have attend ed to their appointment, and now invite them to recommend in writing, signed by one or shore reputable inhabitant, such of the indigent as may come to their know ledge who will be assisted as they may Hand in need, by applying at the State-House, froo: 3 to £ o'clock, on the 6th infl. and every second, fourth and sixth days of the wok, called Monday, and 1 ridiy, at the fame hours, while necelTary ; nad ;nofe who want employ, may likewise apply as above, of to either of the commif lioners at their dwellings. Compu/jiontrs. for the city. Robert Wharton, S. Third-street, No. 135. George Krebc, N. Fifth-flreet, No. 17. John James, ditto No. 18. Israel Ifracl, comer of Chefnut Si Third St. 'Thomas Skviery, N. Fifth-ftreet, No. 20. Edward Garrigues, Cherry-street, No. 39. Comni//toners for the Northern Liberties. Samuel Wjieeler, Vine-street, No. 99. John Wagner, Noble-street. George lnglis, New Market-street. Comrmflioners for Southtvari. Samuel Church, "corner South & Water St. William Lennard, South Second-ftrecti Jlobcrt M'Mullen, Swanfon-flreet. Philadtlphia, September 5, 1797. Prom it, COLUMBIAN CEX7INEL. MR RtHSfLI., AS f'lmr f»ss averted by the secretary of slate, fn his letter to Mr. Pinckney, of January 16th, 1797, are deni d in a publication in the Gnxrttt Nation*!, or XTonilevr Uiiiverfat, a translation of Which appeared in the Cctitinelof Aug. 13d, I Tend you an extra-51. coried verbatim, from an English impreflion of a work of the late M. Briffot. pub lifbe.-J in Paris, in the year-1791 ; vvhicli confirms the trul'j of what the writer in the French paper, »bovs-meminn«d. is pleafej to call, " an accusation as falfe as it is wicked.** Jours, Z A. Y. A. 1 " At the time," fay* he. " when the different powers were establishing the basis of the peace of 1793, M. Vetgennes. a&uated bv private, vi ws, wanted to persuade the ambafladors f rom the con grels, 10 confine themfclves to tbeir fifisriu, and re nouneethe w fiern territory ; that is, an cxtenfiva and fertile country beyond the Alleghanics. This tninifter particularly inlifted that the isuhpendem-e of America Jhould not be one of the fundamental'principles of the treaty, but merely contingent. To fuccted in this project, it was ncteflary to gain over iMetlrs. Jay and Adams. Mr. Jay declared that he would fa erifice bis life sooner than sign such conditions; that the Americans fought for their independence, and that they would not lay down their arms until it waseompletely obtained ; that the court of Franc* had acknowledged it, and could not confidently reeal the avows l . Mr. Jay did not find it diffi cult to hold Mr. Adams in the fame opinion ; nor *«euld M. Vergennes everfubdue hit inflexibility." N.B Th« reader will reeolleS, that Mr. Pick ering mentions in bis letter to Mr. Pinckney, that '" for some time Dr. Franltlin and Mr. fp!yiiig the appropria tions of public money made for the most neccffary, just and ufeful objeiSs, to improper and useless pur poses. The dire&ery like all ufurp«rs in aneient times, and like all the factions who have got upper mot in France during their revolution, know the necefli'y of keeping the army on their fide, which is eaCly done while they hold the purse, but who will forfake them as soon as a llronger party rises up and forcibly wrcfts it froci them ; which it in variably has done towards all the factions who have at different times got the purse into their hands by the Jeftruflion of those who had it in pofieffion. It is an established fait, that before any of the nu merous factions who have for eight years domina ted in France, ventured to denounce the faflion it wilhed to dfftroy.that they previously had the pru dence arid wisdom to fend agents to the armies, to secure by gifts and promises their support, which when attainej, they dared to come boldly forward, denounce,and condemn to death,thofe who were in power. So in Rome, under the emperors, great eare was always taken to secure th: affetSions of the soldiery. Oae day Domna. the mother of Caracal la, blamed the ejnperor her son for being so lavilh towards thefoldiers, as toexliaufl all the money '*- j mailed and l*ft in the public coffers by his father. | •' Make yourftlfe afy, mother, (rejoined Caraealla) J with their swords 1 will nevtr want." These are j the dying worcs of Septimus Scverus to his son : [ « Take care of the army, never mind the other [ Members of the state." Do not these few words include al! the revolution ■ try Ktrality ps princes and falfe republicans who imitate them ? The I'yftcm which bore so long a time, and fti'J bears on the French republic, owes its honor t® the fcrvile imi'ators among them, cf the ancient system of emperors and kings who were above the laws. CaraeaUa profited by the laftcour fel« of hi* dying fa 1 her : under his very long vo part of hi=. Jiibjeits were r garded but his r,I wiers ; h" reserved al! hi; severity for tho'e ciri\ zens whole enlightened minds he feared, or whofc riches he coveted. liad the men in who usurped and fuc»r- '. etl to thcmftlves by frW • and blooit the ercrcife of 'the powers rf fo*rrnmer.t undrr ti c present con ftittition, instead of takirj tv.'o thirds of the c>ld butchering Convention to make the new rpprifeh tatiun, left the citizens at large the freedom of an entire new election, Enrupe would two years ego have been at peace—'France woifl.j have had lef3. internal wounds to heal, and would Hot have 6e«n obliged to pay a forced loan of at least a (liird of whnt each man pofieffed, forcibly demanded with the bayonet at his breaft,their young men torn from their friends to be butchered in extending a terri tory ton large already; nor would thcUnitc' Slates have fufiered the incalculable loiTes which a liflip!? nnauthorifed dicree of riie piratical, lawless direc tory has produced. By the amazing extension rf the territories of Fmrrcc at the cxpence of internal happiness and profnerity, her diabolical ufsjrping rulers havefown the feeds of civil discord, of despotic (which is net imp'rdbabU) of a difmembermentofthe foutbei n ahd nonhern parts of the empire into'two difiiniS IndepibdJfit fove. reignties : snd, as we know the ajtibi.ion of the " Five Headed Monster, 1 ' it is rery probable that each of them may have «onceived the design ih in creasing the impofiibitity of governing France by a republican fyflem, from an overgrown territory and population,of conl'ofidating the other four heads into ONE—HIS OWN. From th: Virginia Gazette, &c. No. VII. A DfivELdPEMENT OF THE CAUSES OT THE DISTURBANCES BETWEEN THE AMERI CAN AND TRENCH REPUBLICS. ylddrefjed to the Ciltieu* of America. MY FELLOW-CITIZENS, IN the fncc?eding pafTages of the fame letter, from Mr. Jefferfon to M. Mazzei, we fee the fame opinion and misrepresentation of the difference of sentiment between the people and the government of America re j peated, in still stronger terras ; and the fame hint for the French to profit by that djver fity of sentiment, held out in rsuah higher colours, of the fame figurative kind for which its author is so remarkable, than in the parts just touched .upon. " I fhonld give you a fever," eonvinues thi» celebrated letter-writer, " If I flu»uld name the apostates who have embraced these hcrffies ; men who were Solomons in council ' and Sampsons in combat, but whose hair has been cut o/fhy the whore of England." Here is not only the fame declaration of the division of our country, but a positive averment that even those who had formerly been diftin#uifhedfortheir wisdom andprow efs in the defence of it, were now rendered too weak and fufpefted by their attachment to Great-Britain, to be feared by those who choose to attack us. Who these Solomons in council and Sampsons in combat were, is too obvious to need an explanation. " They I would wrest from u»," however, it seems, 1 notwithstanding this Sampfonic diminution of their ftrcngth, " that liberty which we have obtained by so much labour and peril; but we shall preserve it. Our mafi of weight and r/ches is so powerful, that we have no thing to fear from any attenpt again ft us by force. It is fyfficient that we guard our selves, and that we break the lilliputian ties by which they have bound us, in the firft slumbers which succeeded our labours.''' Can it be imagined that these sentiments ever flowed from the pen of an Ameriean ? And yet, that they did, I have not the smallest question now rayfelf ; and doubt not but that I shall prove it to the fulleft fatie fadlion of ?very one who will be at the trou ble of reading these papers before I have finilhed. It begins already to be admitted; and the excuse prepared to be offered for this ftrangS and unaccountable attachment to France, at the expense of our own coun try, is, the old'ftyry of the nevetvo-be fa tisficd deht of gratitude to that nation. In deed the lad sentence in the letter itfelf pro nounces its own apology. " It fuffices," fays th; letter, " that we arrest the progrefj of that system of ingratitude and injuflice to wards France, from which,they would alien ate us, to bring us under British influence." It becomes necessary, in order to find out how far this is a fufacieat apology for such conduft, to make some short enquiry into this fubjeft ; which is rendered the more easy and contra£t«d by what has been alrea dy said by others, whose arguments I fitall endeavor to avoid as far as pofiible. It has been rendered manifeft by public documents from the French themselves* that they never thought of rendering us any as sistance at all, until they had supposed our | independence was well established by ourselves ; and in the conclusion of the war it has been proved by the fame authority, that the independence of America was not theirobjeft when they rendered us that aflift ance ; but that they endeavored, all in their power, to thwart U9 in that desirable objeft. And in the secret papers of Louis the XVI, published by order of the convention after his death, it appears from the of that prince's two f counsellors, Turgot & de Vergennes, that it was the policy of that court, by rendering us afiiftance, there by to prolong the war between Great-Britain and this country, as far as it could, in or- j der to exhaust and weaken both, with a view ' of reducing the resources of her antient and ' dreadful enemy, Great-Britain, both at home 1 and abroad, as low a3 possible. To this ) history of their motives in assisting us, I will I add one other piece of testimony, which! appears to have been overlooked, and which" will not, it is presumed, be called in ques tion by any American ; it is the testimony of Dr. Franklin, one of our ministers cm ployed in the whole of our negociations at Paris, on the fnbje£ts of the revolution, our independence, &c. That well remembered lerican, in a letter to governor Pownall,J a member of the British parliament, friendly to America, declares, that one of the con ditions required by France, as a confedera tion for her entering into a treaty of alliance with America, was, that we fhcnld become tributary to them ; and, therefore, that all * See Mr. Pickering's letter to Mr. Piuci ney in Paris. •(■ See Mr. Harper's adat York-Town in Virgin ia, aided very much in the completion-os our revolution. Yet, I cannot agree, that a to tal surrender of that independence, even if they have bestoWed it on us, ought to be made the return for those services. If we are so much indebted ingratitude, that noth ing but a surrender of the thing for which we are thus indebted, can fatisfythe demand, then is the obligation destroyed by the very nature of the demand itfelf; there being no confederation left on the part of America ; ; and it being a principle in all fair dealing, that there is no real obligation where there is no consideration. The vast ainount of the debt being an acknowledgment of the great value of the thing for which we are thus indebted, is a fuffitient confeffion of it elf, of the Vatl injury also, which wpuld be done us by the payment which is demand ed ; for, that a total surrender of our inde , pendence, is the only return that would fatisfy ow generous allies for the services they have rendered, the wretched state of slavery and beggery to which they have reduoed the Dutch awl Belgians for similar services, too loudly proclaims. These deluded peo ple, particularly the Dutch, confiding in their profefiions of friendfhip and good-will for their welfare, fuffered, nay, invited them to take poflefiion of their country, overturn their government, pull down their dykes, convert their fhijis to their own warlike purposes, and destroy the independence of their trade ; by which one of the most fru gal and money-making people in Europe ( were reduced to nought ; and all for what ? To give them an independent government in return, of French chaofing, under which, they had to fnbmit to the opprefllons of their ar mies, and furnifh them with supplies of pro vision* and actual money, by way of requi- Jit 'wn, to the amount of at least fifty-five millons of dollars : While the Belgians were aftually put under military government, and plundered of two hundred and fifty millions of dollars ( under pretence of destroying the clergy) and made to furnifh their armies with provisions at the point of the bayonet; and this too, all under the express -profef fions of felting them free, and making them independent and happy. What have we to expedl from an entire ful»miffion to their de mands on the score of difchnrging our great debt of gratitude, who, from their own ac knowledgments through Turgot and Ver gennes, were only aflilled with a view of prolonging the war, to deflroy us and Great- Britain together : Ana what are we indebt ed, when the demand for that assistance actu ally turns out to be that very deffruSio* which they thus contemplated and dtlired when the service was afforded. Where there is an intention of doinggood, there is no obligation due, even if that in tention fails in its defrred end 5 but if we are to be indebted for a favor done, where there was no intention of doing any, then certainly should we be released, when that, which we considered a favor at ftrft, is at tempted to be turned into an injury in the end. Thug, although the motives for ren dering a service have little or nothing to do with the obligation due for that service, yet the end to which that service goes, has something to do with the obligation.'itfelf. If, for instance, an individual renders me a service, and just as that service is about to have it j itiofl valuable effedt, that individual steps in and claims all its benefits tohimfelf to my utter ruin—where is the benefit to me, where the great obligation I am wnder to him ? To turn this familiar and plain ftatc of the cafe, from private life, into the great and important national dispute be tween France and America, 1 will just make a short statement of fime of the naoft im portant points on which this great debt of gratitude rests ; which I will illustrate with a few examples as familiar and plain is the political way. France, it will be acknowledged, render ed us eminent service at the siege of York ; for which, whatever might have been her motives or opinions refpefting the progress we had made in the revolution towards our independence when fhc entered into the al liance, we are much indebted : but then, it must be acknowledged too, that there was another point of our revolution,prior to both the siege of York and the alliance too, to which great consideration Should be had, as produftive, or at lcaft highly efTeutial, in producing both these great events. Every body remembers to what a low ebb we were reduced in December 1776, and January 1777, long before the treaty ofalliance was formed. The times of our soldiers expir- every comfort, every neceflary and every inducement wanting to intice them to re-inlifl, America had to face at least twenty thousand prime British troops, with about two thousand five hundred uu difciplined, worn out, naked and heartless men, when that celebrated and never-to-be forgotten turn was given to the war, t>y the affairs of Trenton and Princeton,-which arc to be considered as the two neighboring Tlxrmopylas of America. Allowing tke French every possible erf slit fortheir assistance at York, without regard to their motives for entering into the alliance, as I have already done, what let me ask, would those services have availed us in 1781, had we been-con quered, at this critical period of the war, in 1776 ? ' Prior to 'tfee battle of Trenton, which mayjuftly be ftiled the pivot on which the fate of the American revolution turned, the French had fliewn no great decilion in our favor , and never, till after the capture of Burgoyne (which, however lowVe might have been reduced after, until the decisive blow at York, helped to lay the foundation of that final success) was her friendfhip at all aftive : In the firft ot these Memorable events, which is justly to be considered a kind of supernatural intervention in our fa vor, at that awful and alarming crisis, we can be at no loss id pointing out the great and principal agent. In the latter, we have' to form a melancholy chasm in the holy book of gratitude, when we reflect that an Arnold was a most important instrument ; for who has ever thought of gratitude to him for those services, which he afterwards attempt ed to turn to such a wretched conclusion ? And who can think with patience of grati tude to France, when /he demands all, and more no than we ever gained by her afjijlance for the favor ? The moment (he assumed a claimlikc this,(he abandoned the true ground on which our gratitude was founded, and left us more indebted to her, than (he herfelf is to Dumourier for his passed services. It is the end, not the beginning of aftions, which eftablilhes their cbaradter ; and France her felf, since she has become a republic, has carried into aftual praS'ue this principle, much farther than any other nation in'ths universe. -The Marquis de la Fayette, it is well known, was amongst the firft in that coun try who .put a hand to tire real work of re volution. He was the firft to propose the annihilation of titles—the firft aftual step towards Republican ism and Equality —iu which he made aur injury; then, and then only shall he be relieved from our obligations to him ; <he other hand, the Spanifhfcines ex tend fiotn the Guadiana to the Tagus, having Bagdajoy to their right, and Al cantaro on their left, wfiere tberc- is a p.if. sage over the by ,a bridge : ihtir