" . 10 PHILADELPHIA, . & ... fa FRIDA T £7 EN ING > JUN'E 9. /, ♦ i*, X-H.. U Marricrl at K«w by the Rev. Dr. S. S. Smith of Princeton, JOSIAH QUINCY Esq.. of & Boilon, Connfellor at Law, to Miss .ELIZA S. in MORTON, the late Mr. John Morton ifl/erchaut of that City ~. .c< A CURIOSITY. jj f UK. tKXNOi IN returning yflerday evening to my house in the Country, I picked up in the road a paper, f tvhich upon inflection, appeared to be part of ibe proof sheet of a circular letter, written pro bably by cne of the under door ieepers of Con grtfs to his friends in the country—As the faSs therein fated are of a very curious nature, I have taken the liberty of tranfmittir.g it to you fcr publication. " Philadelphia, 2d June, 1797- " Sin; 1 " WE have this day agreed to a report in erf liter to the Preftdert's Speech, which is all f the bufmefs we have done since the meeting of v Cor.grefr; and which I would fend you, but it I is too lengthy for a letter. It hits eojl the coun- try at leafl nineteen or twenty thousand dollars ; t the daily expense of Congress being eflimated at j about one thousand dollars, and which neither f the corftitution nor laws of this country have t required of us, or even warranted in my opin- c ion. It is an evil introduced by our predecessors, who wished tO'be aping oftcr monarchical pomp ; and parade ; forgetting that they were citizens, i and not fubjeSs. In the course of the debates < upon this fubjeS, amendments were brought for- | ward which ultimately prevailed to this effeß : f IVe cherish the hope that the Preftdent will fend [ an Ambassador, or Envoy Extraordinary to f France, who shall declare to that Republic un- ■> equivocally, that, the United States are willing j: to rcrrjtve all inequalities which may exifibetween { her and other foreign relations with the United t States, and require that France would on her a part make good thi spoliations committed on our 1 neuiral rights.— The friends to this amendment £ (amongfl whom I was one)hefitated—Perfuaded it wasbetterto try farther negotiations,&wifhing r rather to conciliate than irritate the French into c war. This principle was opposed by the friends t to the original reportfrom the committee. They n urged that we had fufficient cause to go to war e with the French, in as much as the Executive e DireSory refufed to receive our Ambassador, ti and called him Anglo-American ; that her pride ® ought to be humbled; that America was able to , do it, if fie would Jhew the frmnefs of the c Emperor, and assume the manly tone of Great £~:Z >i' v ! W"'' latter of which (as their J arguments "joeniprove) we ought to form an alliance ofenfive and tvotild t do great things. Again-, that zue kjd no right to ie l the President that we had an opinion it would be affum'tng a Aitlatorial flation, even ( to tell him we had a thought or a w 'tfh about r the matter ; nntwithflandwg he had called Con- \ grefs for that express purpose. Other members \ went Jlill further, whose firmnefs I lament, and * whose politics I very much qucflion ; for Ido 1 not heptate to declare, that I am afraid that j there are many members in Congress, whose fin- ( cere dfire is to involve us in a war with the | mfl powerful nation in Europe, where we mufl \ hazard every thing, put every thing at flake i without tie mofl dijlant profpeci of gain, and in < JLort, when we cannot gain. What unwise ' policy I Infiead cf shewing a dfire to queflion the public councils, to view thepajl conduS, and to provide for the future welfare, it appears more than ever the prevailing y- Is it.not in- " tended to hoodwink the p»pk ifta fi'neth'ng zii >rfe ? Have the ptsplclsen t«l.l ibat there ev- c er was art attempt in the conv:n':on to mould a ~ Kingly government ■? If they have not, let them x take this as a warning, and b: upon their guard, n In the mean time, Irtqurjl furb gentlemen its dif- n approve of this mode of un iting, to Julmit tny letters to their neighbors, and to Jtgqfy their displeasure by -writing trie abetter ; for this ij r in my opinion the W'Jl direct com nun'tcaiive cbun- \ nelthrough yjbkb we cun cor ref pond iv:'h our ;• constiTuents, and cfpes tally when it is remember- t ed what a great diflance vie are from them,and e the amaxing extent of territory they are difper- ji fed over." MR* rCHNCi, - . „ The following extra&, on r '-c autSentictty of which you may rely, as well as on the tru-h of r the matter con-aincd in it, aeferves notice; as j it proves that if the Bricifil iniprefs teamen from ( us, we are raore thati even with them by entic- ( ing a aitich greater nUmier from them. It may tc Lch us to moderate our anger for a|jgreflions, which tho' not juftified, -re certainly in a very great measure, provoked, by th: improper e&s t of cur own citizens. t Extrafl of a letter from Antigua dated sift OISO- c bcr 1796. t Mr. wrote by , and I hope has f fatisfied you that his sentiments coincide pix feiSly r with yours (in the fubjeft of yonr correspondence, ' I know he has had a great deal of trouble, durinjr t this whole war, in rescuing Americans improperly V detained by the officers of the navy, and a very troublefoms part of his duty it mufthavc been.— j Jullice requires however that what can be laid in , palliation of the conduit of those rough ions of the ocean, towards the Americans, ihould not be v omitted :• The Americans have exerted wonderful d induflry in fecre:ing and carrying away deserters from our Navy; you may judge of their diligence v by what they have done, during the hmricane months in this small Illand; one seventy four and '' five frigate*, lying at Englifn Harbour, have loft f fincc the month of August above three hundred t men by desertion ; 1 very large reward has been r , granted by the legislature of the Island for appre- hending these. men, and after the mjft diiligent fearth not above thirty of them can be found in the whole country: we have had no vessels of our I own here to convoy them away, for our {hips all failed before the commencement of the Hurricane r feaion: they have doubtless been carried ofl by t the American vessels that are conllantly corring , and going, and allthefe seamen are a loss to great ' Britain at lead for the remainder of the war. I ' think some pains (hould be taken by the American I Government to prevent Britiih seamen from being ( smuggled in a mannar so improper : or some ar- ] rangement (hould be made between the two countries, by which proper officers might be au thorised on the part of Ureat Britain and the Unit ed States to go on board of American vessels im mediately on their entry into Britiffi ports, and j examining the number ef their seamen ; another examination to take place when they are quitting the port-. this, if properly conduced, would not only effedlua ly prevent them from carrying off Britilh Seamen, but be the means ofpreferving ] their own from the violent hands of the Navy Officers. Extras of a letter from Holland, Feb. 7, 1797. Since Twrote you lad, I am informed that the French Direflory have ordered Mr. Pinck ney to leave France, and he has determined to come into this country and wait here for the Gid«« of his government.-^—At the time when the refill to receive him took place, an inti mation wis given him, that it was expedted he would depart, but he refufed to go, without a written order. This was delayed Until the Di ' reftory received their last dispatches from the United State 6 and the most recent statement of ; the eleflion of President and Vice-Prefident. I hav« already written you in what manner they consider this event —with what mortification they have found their influence inefficient to ' turn the choice, and how much they are incli • ned to persist in their system by their proximity to Juccefs. This last incident strongly corrobo . rated the cpision. A citcumfiance which cannot eft-ape oblerva , tion, is the treatment at this time experienced from the fame quarter by Mr. Monroe. He ' has been upon a tour through this country. He ' came strongly recommended to an influential r member of the committee of foreign affairs, . and to the secretary of that committee, who as well as the French minifler here, paid him the greatest attentions. This member of the com mittee is devoted totally to France. He gave a 1 fplsndid entertainment to Mr. Monroe, at which 1 were present other members, and the secretary t cf the committee, and the American miniller. - After dinner while they were fitting at table, t he aceofled Mr Monroe, and the American mimfierby name, and gave, for toast, "The - peuple ot America." The secretary upon whom ' the American minifler instantly turned his eye, " was apparently confuftd, and inflead of re peatiDg the toast as given, fubflituted in its n liead " the United States." Mr. Monroe said 0 neither the one nor the other. r e This anecdote may appear trivial, but is a clear indication of things far othcrwife. I saw Mr. Monroe almost every day while he 1 was here, he converted with me upon our pub e lie affairs, but with great reserve, particularly ]t -concerning our situation with France. His de portment evidently discovered an exasperated it and strongly agitated mind, though his conver i fation was in every particular extremely gnard d ed. He went from the Hague to Arafterdam, where he flayed only a few days, and from whence he very suddenly set out for Utrecht on his return to Paris, on the fame day when the '/ news arrived here of the order to depart given I t- to Mr. Pinckney. 1- In this country the name of the Vice-Prefi it dent (Mr. Adams) is remembered with refpefl and attachment by the people of all parties. 1" The proofs of it, whick I have observed, are , innumerable, and mrlt particularly fmce the '' recent American cleflions, h:ve become an ob- j jefl of immediate notice and attention. There 1- is however a power extant in this country, 'ie which overrules all attachment and will either -I silence refpeift, or render its voice unavailing. U To an orcer f.gncd from the French Diredory be it what it may, no refinance can be made, '£ and hever is attempted.—lf, therefore, they (hould require of this government to suspend re all intercourse, commercial or or both r- with the United States, tbey could not refufe er tke demand, although folly fenlible ; t would B f be a meajure extremely odious to th« pcoplt, ir andthst in conference 6f such a difference, they would fufftr niucb. ir.ore injury than Aratr icaos. If, tHerrfore, the Amnican minifler (hould be ordered away from hcace, as Mr. p- Pinckney has been from Paris, you will tot be nd fgrprifed. There is not at present any reafo* m. lo ,'xpe; of the lateemprefs is followed by so rrmafkabie j and jinportant a change of fyftein, that it can- j not .be supposed to luvr happened in the com- ta mc# course of mortality. <5; The Frcn.'h army in Italy h:s obtained ano thirfptendid vi&ory. It may give thera Mart tuaj burprnbably will not reconcile the enipe- • . ror yet to the fscrifice ot the Netherlands, j This is now the great apparent obstacle to a < w peace, and fer this the nations of Europe are [le to bleed at every, artery lav years perhaps (o j in come. You will undoubtedly fee the accounts d of Lord Malmclbury's negociatibus, and will t( find in the eonverfation of DeUcr> ix. the pre sent fyftrm of the Directory. Y-ju fee how coolly they are relblved to facrifite this country * —to give up the Cape of Good Hep; ami Trin- to Uf'itain as a compenfatiun for the an- k nsxation of the Netherlands to France. Tbe h j Batavian republic will IWJ be obliged to return c thanks," and glory in holding its Liberty under the tenure of French bounty. [A 1 . T. D- Ad-] The Address In answer to the Speech of the Preiidcr.t of the Unijed States, passed the House of Rcprefentatives by a majority of TWENTY-SIX. Sixty-two Ayes and ' thirty-fix Noes. This Addreis solemnly as- (( fureo the President of the United States, , That they believe that the conduft of the z Government has been just and impartial to- wards Foreign Nations. r It is true that the majority against ftrik- ing out these words was only 8. The faft however is, that on the final decision there was a. great majority in favor of the Ad- dress containing the sentiment. To suppose that any of that majority ° would aft counter to this solemn declaration, may square with the politics of a foreign ? faftion, but would be a gross refleftion on the honor and integrity of any man who pretends an attachment to the interest of the United States. c c BACHE'S PREDICTION, 7TH APRIL LAST. Notwithstanding the appearances of ani- * mofity subsisting between the United States and the Republic of France, we have the I belt founded reasons for believing that the misunderstanding will be of a very short ' (landing, after the business shall have been [ laid before Congress by the President. APPOINTMENT. 1 Jacob Lewis of Dorchester, Massachu setts, Consul at the Isle of France. COMMUNICATION. The Aurora of Wednesday last acknow- ' ledges, in plain language, Mr. Jefferfon's fathering the letter to Mazzei. This is an 1 important—a precious confession. The ' friends of the government will aft according ly. The intelligence ought to be commu- 1 nicated from Maine to Georgia, that the real sentiments of the Vicc-Prejident may be generally known. The Aurora of Wednesday last asserts, <« that some members of 1 Congress dined at the Britilh ministers, on the 4th of June, to celebrate the birth-day of the Britilh Mo narch."—We are authorised, by a gentle man who was present at that dinner, to con tradift positively the aflertion in the Aurora, and to assert that there was not present any member of the federal governmeut, nor any member of Congress The above attempt in the Aurora to deceive the public by lies is worthy of notice. One of the Aurora-men asserts, that the letter from New-York, publilhed in this Ga zette, relative to the eleftion in that city, is a fabrication. The original letter is in the hands of the editor hereof. In one of the French Gazettes publilhed in this city (not Aurora) the speech of Ned Froth is thus eulogized : " After having proved with equal energy and truth ! the jujlice of most of the ac cufationsof France,he(Froth) reproached the United States with forgetting the services which the French nation have rendered them." " I am, cried he, one of those whose number is daily diminifhing—[" A preci ous confeflion"—it is high time that such patriots should become fcarce.J To meet the decided approbation and even eulogium of an enemy, must be regarded as rather lame evidence of the patriotism of the objeft of it. Improb'.s laudari viluperari ejl. The repeated accounts we receive of mis representations circulated in France by our jacobins, must convince the Americans that the differences between the Government of that country and of the United States, has proceeded mostly from the arts and treache ry of our citizens. When we fee such abo minable fallhoods as those contained in Mr. Jefferfon's letter, propagated through Eu rope by those charafters who have held high offices in America, we are tempted to apolo gize for the resentment of a nation exposed to those deceptions. The evil is deep root ■ ed among ourselves—and unless some mode can be adopted to restrain these traiterous f correspondencies, between the faftious of • our own citizens and foreign governments, we (hall never be represented to Europeans in our just charafttr. We have taken pains, Snce the opening 1 of Spring, to make enquiries of gentlemen , from different parts of the country, ref j pefting t,hc state of the public mind in the ' interior. We find but one opinion, as to r public affairs, the farmers, who conflitute ' the strength of our Republic, and who be „ to no party, as a body wish foracon y tinuaace of Peace. At the fame time, they it are extremely irritated at the injuries we d fuffer from France, and if no honourable e means can bejound to prc-ferve peace, they will, with 'jxrfeft unanimity, and great ,spi rit, encounter the perils of war. . Such we may be affnred is the unanimous sentiment of .< the Eaftem States. N. T. Paper. A Ccrr;:fpondent 00feryes-—that at the Hi l late reviews in the several Counties of this fei D{ftrift, the fame noble spirit pervaded the mi whole body of-, people, with refprft the \y< unpleasant fifuation of this couutry with lia France. All declare themselves willing to ne take up antis in defence of the Indeprn- th der.qe of thfir Coilr.try, and against any te Nation that would dare to interfere with dc their internd GoVerr.ir.snt —or attempt an infioious diitinftion between them and those tc whom they have freely chosen as their ra- in lers—that they are enemies to all Foreign tc influence —and that France,by her late con- r: dust, has rendered her friendfhsp suspicious j to the people of the United States, | hi What pleafureable lenfations must it ere- j cl ate in the breaiis of genuine Americans, to re find that the mr.fs of out fellow-citizens as know Jio-w to appreciate their dear bought ai liberties; and that they with one voice de- fi< clare themselves ready to defend their coun- pi try against all attacks. ( IVihnmgtof., N. C.paper —MAr 2s. P The" Quotidienne" aParispaper,makes in the following interesting remarks on the li' late Proclamation of the Executive Direc- ti tory, relative to the Primary Assemblies : " The Direftory formally invites all citi- g zens not to choofc those who regret-the an- ft cient regimen. I beg to aik," fays the a writer, "what it metns by the words ancient tl regimen. Does it wish to exclude those who regret the tranquility we enjoyed under f< our kings ? No ; the Direftory has no in- tention to perpetuate disorders. Does it & allude to those, who regret the time when ° our property was held sacred ? No ; the n Direftory will not protest and encourage r pillage. Does it speak of those who regret a the day when no blood was Ihed on the fcaf- ti fold, but that of robbers and affafiins ? c No ; the Direftory seeks the retiirn ps 1 the reign of justice. Does it mean to point t: out those, who regret the Lettres de Ca- d chet ? No'; the Revolutionary Committees have made us forget them. Or does it per- t haps allude to those who regret the reign of: t Religion ? No ; Government has formally 0 proclaimed the liberty of religious worihip. ! <3 What then do you mean by ancient regi- 0 men ? A king, no doubt ; but he was r murdered by you. Besides, the word king f is void of sense, and a Republic of frogs alone can demand a king without making men- r tion of a government. A king may be as well e at the head of a Republic, as at the head J of a Monarchy. The Spartans were certainly 1 stout republicans, and yet they had two 1 kings. Poland was a Republic, and yet £ Poland had a king. The word king is there- fore a bug bear to frighten children and c nurses. The word ancient regimen conse quently implies an absurdity, and should not 5 be found in a Proclamation' of the Direc- 1 tory. London paper. MR. fp.nno, | : AS the right of a Neutral Nation to protest* its commeree by convoys, is now agita- 1 ted, I inclose a quotation from Puffendorf ' on that fubjeft, and with you to insert it ' in your Gazette. A. B. 1 In the year 1692 the celebrated Mr. Pus- 1 fendorf was consulted on the free navigation of the Northern Powers of Europe, during a war between the Englilh, Dutch and ' French, when he gave the following opi nion : " If the Northern Princes can maintain ! " their trade with France by fending strong " convoys with their fleets, I fee nothing to ! " blame in it,, provided their vessels do not j . " carry contraband goods. The law s of j " humanity and equity between nations do 1 «• not extend so far as to require, without any j ( " apparent necessity, that one people should " give up its profits to another." I CONGRESS. f HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. r Wednesday, June 7. Cmcluf.ori of Mr. S Smith's remarks, t If the latter amendment was agreed to, s he should be for striking out the whole, leav -1 ing it general, because with Weft Indies in it, it would be particularly pointed. ; They had been told of the loss fuftaifled - by spoliations, and where it fell. He believ £> ed it fell uppn the great body of the people of America, and that the fall in the price of 1 produce had been occasioned principally by s the Britilh admiral having forbidden the car s rying o four provisions to Hifpaniola. The Britilh fleet, in the Weft Indies, he said, was supplied with provisions from Ireland, whilst the French depended upon this coun - try for supplies, so that they were our best r customers there. ,t The gentlemanfromS. Carolina (Mr. W. if Smith) supposed the cry of war would have lb no effeft in the country ; but let us refer ■- back to to the British treajy, said he, when >- that gentleman was so loud in his cry- But r. that was a war with Great Britain, and not 1- with France. At that time there was not h a British tear which was not called forth by i- the appealswhich were made on this ground, d But, Mr. S. said, he did not then fear t- war, nor did he now, if they took prudent le measures. The gentleman said,, his plan was is to prevent war, and yet he proposed to go )f to Jight and Jink the vessels of a particular na s, tion. This was a way of prefervirig peace is peculiar to himfelf. If merchant's vessels were armed, they j ig would fcrve the purpose of privateers, which ■ll might be used against our own vessels. Tin's I f- was 3 risk he did not chufe to run. But it le was a curious faft, that at the fame that we to are proposing to permit the merchants to te arm, they express a disinclination to it ; be e- cause they love their country bette vthap their n- own interest. But the gentleman had said that the expence of insurance would be lef ve fened by this arming- On the contrary, he ile (and he was an underwriter) should confiiler ey the ri(k greater from their having guns. In ?i- 4e<*'he found the InCurancf Offices were all ve against the measure. of But the gentljrrvan fays, let.the French know we are preparing. He trusted we (hoaid prepare a defence which could not of fend any oue. Let us do all we can to pro ■ mote peace ; let tl>d negociations go on. It would he a fine ltory, indeed when a reconci liation was about to take place bctwnct our negociatdrs and the French government that they (hou'd hear we were {inking her priva teers in- the Weft Indies. They would doubtless fend them about their bulinefs. The gentleman from S. Carolina seemed to thick it was right for our veflek to go". into Rebel .ports in the Weft Indies ; and told them < tour men being taken by Vittor HugueSj coaiideredas pirates and hung (Mr. W. S. denied having said our citizens were Lung) Mr. S. read Victor pro clamation, (though he said he had no more refpeft for him than that gentleman, as he had loft 6or 7,<360 dollars by him) and (hewed that those persons were only con sidered as traitors who failed out of rebel i ports, and not citizens of the United States. Nor were those ports conlldered as rebel ports which were taken by the Engliih, (Cape Nicholas Mole was one of those) but merely those which were in a state of rebel lion, to which, if we were determined to trade, it would certainly lead to war. Mr. S. said he was surprised to hear the gentleman from S. Carolina make one cori feffion, viz. that the French minister had allured our government the prizes taken in the Weft Indies were unauthorized, because when he had aiferted the fame thing, on a former occasion, that gentleman denied it. Mr. S. inftfted that the French trade carri ed on to the Weft Indies was a produftive one, and that payments were in geperal made as punctual, as in any otber parts, and referred to m?jor Mountflorence's letter for an aft of generosity .never (hewn by the Bri tish ; nay, he thought there was a better chance of getting money owing from France than there was for getting it for any spolia tions committed by the Britiih, and novv;un der adjudication. Mr. S. concluded by faying, be had ano ther reason for opposing the meaiufc. Two thirds of his constituents were farmers, and one third citizens, and they enjoined him to do all in his power to keep this country out of war ; he thought the rejection of this resolution as tending to this end, and there fore he opposed it. ! Mr. Harper went into a defence of the resolution at considerable length. lie deni ed that the French could take reaforiable grounda of offence at the mcafure, as the power would only be given under such re ftriftions as mull prevent it from being abus ed, as men would never wantonly forfeit the sums in which they were bound to obey their order?. » When Mr. Harper fat down there was a loud call for the committee to rife (it being past three) when Mr. Livingfton rose, and hoped the question would be taken. The : question was put for the committee to rife, | and carried 42 to 40. J A bill was received from the Senate for raffing and organizing an additional corps ■ of artillerists and engineers, which was read the firft time ; when Mr. Macon moved that it be rejefted, as he favv no rrecefiity for in , creasing our army. The-motion was oppo sed by Mr. W. Smith, who said the men . | would be wanted for supplying the garri i sons ; and in order to get rid of the quef . ; tion, he moved the House to adjourn. Car ried. FRIDAY, MAY 16. In committee of the whole, Mr. Dent in the 1 chair, on the amendment of the answer to the ' ; Prclidtnt. : | Mr. Dennis said, being unacquainted with f j the fubjedl, In a manner, and newly honored j 1 with a feat i'> the honfe, he thought it mofl prn r ! der.t to observe silence hitherto, and should still j . have remained had he not observed thf ground offome gentle.r,en's arguments, which had roused him to a sense of his duty; he, un der that imprefDon.came forward, not merely to examine many of the arguments introduced on this <>ccafjon, but to Ihew his reaforis why , he could not vote in favor of the amendment now before the Committee. It appeared from the turn the debate had ta ken, as though the quetUon was, whether A , merica fnould enter into a war or nut, —at leali - it would appear so to persons attending to the [! debate ; indeed, he said, be (hould not be at all fuprifed if at this moment waggon loads of pe- I titions were on the road from all quarters, to ~ reflrain this body from entering into a war with " the French Republic : was the question alked e of a person who had not heard it, the answer f mud natually be war —whether we (hauld now y declare war againltthe French. In the remarks he had to make, he could ii'ot e flatter himfelf to be able to display the talents . which feme gentlemen had done, he mufletm ' tent h unfit If with a few defultoty obfervitiaiis, '> and endeavor to dire& them as much to the 1- point as pofiible. It had been the prafiice of I some gentleman to commence their harangue to the house, on the imprcfiiens under which tftey came into the government. ' Notwfth ftanding some observations which hal hceo made on tbis fuhjedt by a gentleman, (Mr. r Livingfton,) tho' a new member, Mr. Der.nis n said, it would not he very extraordinary if he It were to explain his impreihons on Crft coming it into the houie, but he Olould not so tike up the )t time of the committee. Kor should he follow y the other gentleman (Mr. Frftrr an,) on lie j fnhje prr vadc this country not inly to of. die ; h french natiOh b'M iq fr*nt* is ral. Lome, ft id Mr. Dennis, the fahie it iroprffliort*—l-oqce .felt. vi'.b enll-ulb/m -the re WCle of the French, becaafc "hdr'a'imyMifcr at to tempt wai librrty. I rejoifftj ''in'be* victories and felt'hcr troubles";- fi# hnjj:'la«..hss aim was _. lib: rtv •• fend-iighcrivff»&■*}#&/««»-.: jGaa, I : . ,r felt in tref behiu .--fbut whuta fitKa- J " tloii it Ifce Mow f4No vktugtf tnju ed, thf :f- bw ter.-viOyjej ivty'e made her be he comet-be no l.nger .i;, the r.iufr of free«lom hir aim. tiut ia!sg 1 AiWlizt n. ment .* witK;her"«)Mi!f»e fcf £oii3*a tt_ OecOmc* cbligatsry (Vjr liie to chailgi frorn the approba- J1 t}6ti 1 fottherty -telt in : her ; bcUilf; tiie now comrs for wire! »:)• regulate onr concerns I c " thnefm e> c?n no longer sjpopfe h?r and yc mult candidly dcclaic myClf pets- urjrarc-