fcid legiflatwrc, Kcnley Johns was appoint «d by the governor oi laid state, tp fill th« vacancy occasioned by the rdignation aforefaid. "Whereupon the committee submit the following resolution. " Refvlved, That Kenfey Johns, ap pointed by the governor of the (late of Delaware, as a Senator of the United States, for said state, is not entitled to a feat in the Senate of the United States ; a feflion of the legislature of the said state having intervened, between the resigna tion ot the said George Read and the ap pointment of the said Kenfey Johns." On the question to agree to this report It paifedin the affirmative—Yeas 20 — Nays 7. The yeas and nays being required by one-fifth of the Senators present— Tliofe who voted in the affirmative, are, Mcrflrs. Bradford, Bradley, Brown, Bun', Butler, Cabot, Edwards, EUfwo,rth, Fre linghuyfen, Gunn, Hawkins, Jaekfon, King, Langdon, Livermoie, Martin, Mit chell, Monroe, Robinfcn and Taylor. Those who voted in the negative, are, MefTrS. Foster, Izard, Morris, Potts, Ru therfurd, Strong and Vining. Resolved, That an attested copy of the resolution of the Senate on the appoint ment of Kenfey Johns, 'Esq. to be a Sena tor of the United States, be transmitted, by the President of the Senate, to the executive of the state of Delaware. A meflage in writing, was received from the President of the United States by Mr. Dandt/dge his Secretary. United States, 28th March, 1794. Gentlemen of the Senate, and of the House of Representatives, In the execution of the resolution of Congress, bearing date the 26th of March J 794, and imposing an embargo, I have requested the governors of the several states to call forth the force of their militia, if it Ihould be neceflary, for the detention of veflels. This power is conceived to be incidental to an embargo. It also deftrves the attention of Con gress, how far the clearances from one diftrift to another, under the law as it now stands, may give rife to evafioiis of the embargo. As one security, the Col lectors have been inftru&ed to refufe to receive the surrender of coasting licerifes for the purpose of taking out regilters, and to require bond from regiflered ves sels, bound from one diftrift to another, for the delivery of the cargo within the United States. It is not understood, that the resolu tion applies to fifiiing vessels ; although their occupations lie generally in parts be yond the United States. But without further reflridlions there is an opportunity of their privileges being used as'means of eluding the embargo. A.ll armed vessels, poffeffmg public com ir.uTious from any foreign power (letters of marque excepted) are conlidered as not liable to the embargo. T htfe circum/lances are tranfihitted to Congress for their coniideration. G. WASHINGTON. On motion, Ordered, That the message from the President of the United States of this day, be referred to Mr. Burr, Mr. Morris and Mr. Langdon, to confidcr and report thereon to the Senate. The Senate proceeded to the considera tion of the amendments reported by the committee, to whom was referred the bill, entitled, "an act to provide for placing buoys on certain rocks off the harbor of New-London, and in Providence river," and having adopted the fame, and agreed that the bill be amended accordingly. Ordered, That this bill pass to the third reading. The bill, sent from the House of Re prefer.tatives for concurrence, entitled "an ad transferring, for a limited time' the junfdiftion of suits and offences, from the dillrift to the circuit court of New- Hampshire, and assigning certain duties, in refpeft to invalid pensions, to the at torney of the said diftrjet," was read the second time. Ordered, That this bill pafsto the third reading. l,^ r "i7 inin l S n0 , t:fied the Scnate > that he jhould on Monday next, move for leave to bnng in a bill, to alter the times of holding the circuit courts of the United , States, in the diftrift of Delaware Mr. EHfworth from tl le committee to whom was referred the bill, to make pro- J' d u W f nd " r P han children of Robert Forfyth, who was killed in the service of the United States, reported an amendment, vVliiili was adopted, and it was agreed that t'ye Lill thould be amend ed accordingly. Ordered, That thie bUi-pafs to the third reading. A meiTage from the House of Repre fen tat Ives by Mr. Lambert, in the ab sence of Mr. Beckley their clerk, detain ed by ficknefa. " Mr. Prefulent—Tile Speaker of the House of Reprefeutatives having signed two enrolled biils, I am dire&ed to bring them to the Senate for the signature of the Vice-Prendent"— And he withdrew. The Vice-President ligned tbe enrolled bill, entitled, " an adl to authorize the President of the United States in certain cases to alter the place for holding a fefli on of Congress also the enrolled bill, entitled, " an ast for the relief of Stephen Paranque," and they were delivered to the committee to be laid before the Presi dent of the United States for bis approba tion. Agreeable to the order of the day the Senate resumed the motion m»de the 25th inft. to take into consideration the state of the nation, and after debate Oi€ered, That the confide ration there of be postponed. A message from the House of Repre-> fentatives by Mr. Lambert-*-, " Mr. President—The House of Re presentatives recede from their disagree ment to the amendment infilled on by the Senate, to the bill, entitled, "an ad to provide for the ere&ing and repairing of arsenals and magazines, and for other pur poses." And he withdrew. The Senate adjourned until 11 o'clock on Monday morning. Congress of the United States. House of Representatives Thursday, April 14. Mr.Swift's obfervationjupon therefolution introduced by Mr. Clark, to prohibit the importation of the manufactures of Great Britain and Ireland, till fatis faChon should be made for the fpolia* tions on our commerce—for the ne groes carried away contrary to the trea ty of peace—and till the wefteru polls be given up. Mr. SWIFT commenced bis observa tions by remarking that it was extremely painful to consume ths time of the com mittee in difcufling a measure, when it was apparent that there was a decided majority against the opinion which he en tertained. But the resolution on the ta ble deeply affe&ed the interest of his country, and would probably be produc tive of the greatest injury—he therefore deemed it proper for him to offer his sen timents on the fubjeft. He said if we turned our attention to a period not very remote, we should find our country flouriftiing in the highest prof penty and felicity—but the profpeft had lately been changed. We have been at tacked on all fides, and our commerce nearly destroyed. In the Weft Indies we have not only fuffered spoliations on our trade, but our citizens have been expofecj to the mod aggravated insults and 'aLufe —all wished to obtain redress for these injuries—the difference of opinion respect ed mode : It was therefore extremely un* fair to charge the gentlemen who oppose j this measure with tamenefs under the in sults and injuries offered to their country, because they deemed this mode to be in efficient, when they declared their readi ness to pursue those measures which they conceived were most efTeftual to obtain ,a«ion for the injuries we had sustain ed. i The gentlemen who advocate the reso lution on the table, contend, that It is calculated to prevent a war—to preserve P Tu~" bf ' m fat ' Bfa and powerful nations on the globe. If we are not proud and insolent, we at least have a claim to a liberal (hare of vanity anil felf-confidence. This would be an excellent instrument to govern the British nation—but we have reason to think, that they will laugh at the ide% iniiead of being frightened. * Mr. S. then remarked,- that we ought to pursue a different mode—that by the laws of nations, unaccompa nied by any menacing measures was the proper step, and there was the faireft prof pe(S of success. He considered the con- troverfy and difputc subsisting between Great Britain, and the Unjttci States to be in a situation peculiarly proper for, ne gociation, and that there was the faireft bafi» for explanation and acccommoda tion. He said that no complaint had been made on oui part to the court of Great Britain, dating our injuries and de manding fatisfaftion—and that when Mr. Pinckney our minister at London, demand cti an explanation of the intention of the Britiih court by the order of the 6th of November, they declared that no condem nations were to take place in virtue of it, which would not have been legal if the order had not been iflued. A construc tion wa6 put upon that order by the minif tj7» which denies the principles on which the condemnation in the Wdt Indies had been founded, and Which of course, dis avows the trani'a&ions of .which we com pfein. We may therefore fairly suppose, that the Court of Admiralty in the Weft-In d'es > have contradicted the orders and in tentions of the Britifli Ministry."* We have not heard what effect these condem nations of our vessels, have had ,on the fintifh Court—lf we fliould ftateto them, the injuries we have fuflained, which we ought to do, as they have been committed in a remote part of their dominions appa rently contrary to the design of the court. There is the strongest teafon to believe, that we shall obtain redress, because by their own conftrudtion, of the order of the 6th of November, they have dis proved of the principle, by which the in juries have been committed, and of course, they are bound by their own conftru&ion, to make us that fatisfa&ion, which we demand. Mr. S. laid if we concluded a negoci ation, without giving offence, it was pro bable we should obtain the influence of be Bnt.fh fubjefts in our favor. If, when 110 , cr ' Ca " merchants in London, dis covered the order of the 6th of Novem ber, they were alarmed, and immediately demanded an explanation of the court, lh'» (hews that there is a powerful inte m that in favour.of a con-- merciai connection w.ia this :—lf -re dd nothing to wound their pride, this iuflii ence will be exerted to preserve the con nexion. The tautual inteix-ft, and Wel fare of both countries, may be fairly tak en into consideration, in adjusting tne dis pute. But if we adopt a menacing- met lure, offenfive to the nation ; we ft. all ] o f e the influence of our friends, in accompliib ing an accomodation. While such is the state of our affaire, we ought to try a fair negotiation on equal and liberal teu'i, 3j unembarrassed by any menace or infuit| and there <«' 'Wis; .and hcvt the rji lo th: JZxccut'.v e. I by no means defpalr of the ability of country to dtfcod itfdf against a for-