CONGRESS H use of Representatives. Wednesday, Jartuary 29, The S PbECH of Mr. Smith, of South' Carolina, in reply to Mr. M dison, on the inject tf the Ccto n.rci.il Regulations. / [comtinued] To depreciate the difciimination in our favor in the Briti/h I (lands by the exclufi -011 qf the produce of other nations, the gentleman had laid the exclulion was only a matter of form and a remnant t>[ the old colony f\ ft em. * 'r. 61111 th said this was no answer to la* 'tw;s a remnant of the colony fy. stun ' —I hat fyltem aimed at peculiar privilege* to the national Dominions ; as far as we, leing foreigners, iliil partake ol u.olc privileges, 'tis to our advantage; funpofc under that old fvftem we had co ntinued to enjoy the right of navigating to the lfl.uds, wouid it have been a dispa ragement of the right that it was only a remnant of the old colony system ? Neither was it true that.it wasonlv matter of form auJ of no confluence: though we can in general (upply the islands better than othvr nations, it does not,follow that o thefs could not fujiply at all: The French coionies could not get flour on as good teirns as we can furnifh them ; yet that article was prohibited, and in general the Britifli colonies could not be supplied equally well as from us, yet in the years oi lcarcity in this country, and of plenty ehewhere, a competition might injure us: W.iy could not lice in particular be sup plied from the Porttijuefe dominions in cc with our's ? Much reliance had been placed by the gentleman on the disproportion of Ame ric.rri and Britiih tonnage employed in the commerce between the two countries } he hal dated that in 1790 the British ton n; was 211,000 the American only 4-• »COC : But Mr. Smith observed the cc:np»rifon was not accurate: the rule p:.; fired by the gentleman was entry, not real tonnage : and as we have no direst tonnage with the Britidi Welt-Indies, from which entries, are frequent, the Bri (''■ '• tonnage is swelled by that frequency of entries, as happened in the cafe of the Anerican tonnage employed between the B; tithand French dominions. The house hiving no materials before them, it was in;poffible to pronounce how far this eir ci:',flthnce varied the true proportion, but it was easy to fee that it mud do it greatly! Arguments had been-likewife drawn from the greater pi oportion of onr tort nage employed in our trade with Spain, Portugal, &c.- Mr. Smith thought the principle of co.r.'pariion was a proof of nothing, ex- that Britain was a more navigatrng poxier than the nations in general with whom we have commerce : It Was no teji ot the fyitem of either. Tin's was evi dent when we compared the proportion of our tonnage with Britain, and with Spain and Portugal, for as the latter e qually Vith Biita'n excluded us from their colonies, their !y (terns were eflentially the farre : But Britain has extensive means of navigation, Spain and Portugal slender ntcaiis, so that while our bottoms were the principal carriers between those countries and us, Britain maintained a competition wi'rtrus in the trade between her domini on ■ and us. But^could it be proved that this was either avoidable in the present clrcumdances of the country, or that we oifght to attempt to avoid it by violent or farced expedients. The navigating dates, in the European trade between the Britiih dominions and the United States, prepon derate greatly in the article of tonnage ; Great Britain may have the advantage in the rton-naWgating dates ; this arises, in a great degree, from a cause which navi. gation laws cannot enre—the fujpeiiority of capital. The merchants of Britain can supply on long credits, what those of our navigating dates cannot; they have more mam to purehafe' and export the commo dii ie» of the south ; from both causes they carry on a confldera'ole part of "the south ern trade, and they make their own (hip. ping the indrutnent of it. No means cal culated to multiply our vefTels, can under exidirrg circumllances, obviate this course of things. But the remedy of violent and forced expedients would be pernicious, if if could be fuccefsful : It would divert our cap'tal, in too great a degree, from better to worse bufinefa, from agriculture, commerce and mauuf.fturcs, to mere na- ligation. The true conrfe, he thought, was to fofter our navigation by gradual and moderate encouragements, and to ex pert from time and the increase qf refour— <•«, the advantages, of which w