TTwfc who voled in the afLmatn-r, * Mefli-j. Bradford, Cabot, Ellfworth, toiler, Freliughuyfrn, Hawkins, Izard, King, Liverm:.re, Mitch el, Morris, Potts, Strong, and Vmiog. Tiiofe who vcted in the negative, are Meurs. Bladley, Bro\vn, Buh, Butler, Edwards, CJunn, Jaodou, Langdon, Mar tiij, Monroe, Robmfou and Taylor. 0:w vrtion, Re . -ived, That an attelied copy of the resolution of the Senate, declaring the e- of Albert Gallatin to be void, be tranfimued by the Prefideat of the Senate to the executive of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The report of a coihmittee on the peti tion of Conrad Laub and others above referred to, and ffiadc on the 10th iulL is as follows ] The committee of*cle fenred gentlemen to make excuses in si milar situations, and from his knowledge of Mr. Grllatin's modelty of difpofitiori. —When being allied, whether he ever heard Mr. Gallatin fay that he had not been a citizen of the United States, nine years previous to his election, the depo nent replies, he never did. Upon being ed by Lewis, counftl for the petition ers, what he had ever heard Mr. Gall-tin fey touching his citizenship, the deponent f-ephes, that a considerable time subse quent to Mr. Gallatin's election, Mr. Gallatin in conversation with the depo nent exprefled an opinion, that he was qualified with refpeft to citizenship.— \\ hat else did you ever hear Mr. Galla tin fay with refpeft to his citizen/hip ?_ The deponent ar.fwers that he recollects having heard him fay something with refpeft to the laws of Massachusetts not requiring an oath of il tli e tin'e of his, opinion as aforcfeio'. D d you ever hear Mr. Gallatin fay he was born in Europe ? The deponent replies, that he dix:3 mrt recollect Mr. Gallatin's faying tint he was born iji Europe, but that has heard Mi. Gallatin Ipeak of himlell as a Genevan, mention his family in Geneva, and in conversations with him hath always understood him to be of Ge neva. Did you ever hear Mr. Gallatin men tion the time of his coming into Ameri ca ? He replies, that he thinks Mr. Gal latin, about a year past mentioned, that he had been thirteen years in this coun try, and that he was nineteen years old when he came. Did you ever hear Mr. Gallatin lay when or where he took the oath of allegiance ? He replies, he heard Mr. Gallatin fay that he took the oath of allegiance in Virgina, but as to the time, the deponent cannot be precise, but he thinks, if he can recollect, that Mr. Gallatin did mention to him, though he cannot be certain, that it was not nine years before he was elected. That the deponent thinks Mr. Gallatin's doubts relpe&ing his citizenftiip were founded on this ground, the witneis referring in this part of his testimony to the meeting be fore mentioned, when these doubts were expressed ; but he cannot fpecify the time o£ Mr. Gallatin's having mentioned* to him the cireumftance of his having ta ken the oath of allegiance. Sworn to and fubferibed January 28th x 794* Mr* Thomas Stokeley being sworn de pofeth and faith, that some few days be fore a Senator was chofcn for the State «f Pennsylvania a meeting was had to fix on a proper person to represent the state in that oiiice, sundry perfon® were darted as candidates, among whom was Mr. Gal latin, who upon his being named, obser ved that there were many other perlons more proper-to fill that office and also ob served, that there might be doubts as to his citizen/hip, though the deponent from the ,ength of time and not expecting to have been called upon, retains too flight an impression of what then pafled, to be able to recollect the words with precision. i oat at a fubfequerit meeting for the fame purpose, Mr* Gallatin was finally agreed to be nominated, and the deponent heard no objedhon started thereto, either by Mr. Gallatin (who was prefcnt) or any other person- Sworn to and subscribed February ill, 1 794- The before recited evidence being in troduced and clofcd on the part of the petitioners, Mr. Gallatin was alked whe ther he had any teilimony to produce on his part, to which he gave the following answer in writing, to wit: " The committee to whom the petition ot Conrad Laub, &c. was referred, ha ving informed me that the petitioners had doled their evidence, and a/kcd me " whe ther 1 had any teilimony to produce on my lide, ' I ANSWER, that it appears to me that there is not fufficient matter charged in the petition, and proved by the teilimony to vacate my feat; that by the icfoiution appointing the committee, the petition is referred to them to Hate the ta&s, « without prejudice as to any quef t'ons which may, upon the hearing, be rai sed by the fitting member, as to the fuf ficiency of the parties and the matter charged in the petition that epon the hearing, & in the present stage of the fame, the quellion as to the fufficiency of mat ter, as above dated, is raised by me ; that I conceive from the evident conflru&ion of the resolution, I have a right to have that question decided by the Senate : that until the fame /hall have been decidcd, I do not wilh to be at the trouble and ex pense of collecting evidence at a great distance ; and therefore, that at present I do not mean to produce any teilimony, reserving, however, to myfelf the right which I conceive I have to produce any teilimony in my favor, after the said question (hall have been decided bv the Senate, in cafe it is decided against me." (Signed) ALBERT GALLATIN. Which being duly read and coniidered the committee came to the following re solution to wit: Whereas the evidence on the part of the petitioners having been closed,' and it appearing that Mr. Gallatin was an alien in the year 178 c—and his anfweriii writing afligning realms why he fliould not adduce evidence on his' part in the pre fect flage of the enquiry not boimr in the opinion of the committee fufficiesit. R f/ia:J, Tiot in the opinion of the committee it is now iiicum ent on Mr. Osllatin to Uiew that lie has become a ci tizen of the Uiiited Stales ai:d when. Which refolutioji being read ,to Mr. Gallatin, he iiiformd the committer be (hould n:ly on the aniwer he had before given. All which is refjieflnilly submitted to the Honorable Si'ssti*, by the Omixuitc. ("To be coaiinuid.) For the G.izstts of the Unitsd Stj Tit, The cafe of the People of Kentucky, in their demand of a tree navigation of ths river Mifiifippi, through the dominions of the Spaniards, is but little known or understood—and dcierve* to be coufider ed. The States, then Colonies, confedera ting in 1775, to aflot their common li berties, had either definite, or indefinite, territorial claims. The whole being Gived and secured by the ■: ins of the United States, 110 other expe&atioD was entertained on the fettling of our independences, but that State*, having the indefinite- claims, ihould be al lowed to take out of them what further it might be convenient to add, to their local jurudi&ion, leaving the remainder to the Union, as a fund towards extin guifning the national debt incurred by the war. Had the government of the union been in any respect efficient, such would have been the event, but it being far otherwifc it rfcfted upon the States themselves to make the transfers. A partial intereil prevailing over so equitable a confideiation, and over the sense of common good, few of the States made cessions to Congress until they had cut oti for themselves the nearcft and fair ell portions, leaving to the Union i'carce any parts that could in a generation be brought into life—Such acceflion of pro perty, in consequence brought, with it r.ither a burthen than benefit. The in jured Ifotes remonstrated in vain the confederation was threatened in its con summation, and for a time endangered. One of the states particulaly a (Turned and fold out the diftrift called Kentucky for her tT.vti benefit ; which besides put ting m~mey into her tieafury afforded a profitable ipeculation to her individualci- tizcns. This proceeding of the state was far from an adherence to the rule spoken of the space already occupied by her exiftingf lettlers, was then of an extent fufficicnt for local jinifdich'on, for by her own con sent Kentucky was set apart from her as a new state—Kentucky ought then, ac cording to the rule, to have been in the allotment to the general government. Injured in the loss of property, Ame rica fulfained a further and more serious injury by. this meafurc—inafmuch as it was an attempt, of bad example, to form premature settlements of the back lands, which were necefiarily to lead off great numbers of inhabitants from the maritime country, that country which pught to have been the obje6t of our immediate hope and" care ! thus proportionably batt ening its growth or retarding it progress contrary to all true policy, which would rather seek to confohdate our po pulation than to spread it out thinly over the vast expanse of Western wilderness, where beyond the waters of the Atlantic an intere.'l would grow up of its own, aa wide apart from ours as the two countries are wide in space. An enlarged fpirrt of patriotism will, however, not object to any thing while the objedl is to better th; condition of men—true ! but is it bettering the condi tion of any men to take them from fixa tions where every species of industry it happily retributed, and turns to its full account, and to set them down where from circumstances of locality their faculties and their labours are so little available, as that according to, their own complaining reprefentatioii " wretchedtiefs ar.d poverty await them." But wretchedneis and poverty would no longer be their lot, If the Spaniards, in witholding from the people of Ken tucky and other western settlers, the free navigation of the Mississippi, did not de prive them of the natural market for the produaions of their induilry. A right they claim, and which they pafiionately and clamoroully call upon the United States to vindicate for tliem, with a threat that jf refufed they will take rtdrefo into their own hands.