Sht gedhml 6a??ttr. Friday Morning;, February 21, IMIH. WE print, this week, to theexclusion of our usual variety, the powerful speech of SENATOR DOOLITTLE, deliv ered in the U. S. Senate a short time ago, and the John-on-Grant correspon dence, in which Gen. Grant is so com pletely used up. The editor is also ab sent, which will account for lack of or iginal matter. GRANT'S DISGRACE. Hon are tiie Mistily Fallen ! Falsehood anil Duplicity explicitly prov ed upon F. S. Grant ! I'be President's Last Letter to the I>e m funet Ulysses! Five Members of the Cabinet. Messrs. Welles. McCnlloeli. Randall. Ilrou niiis and Kenard, testify to the Lying; and Donble-dealim; of the Great Military Pretender! A Complete Showing Fp of that Consn inate Impostor, "Grate-yard" Grant 1 Read ! Head ! Read ! The charge having been made that Gen. U. S. Grant hud made a distinct promise to the President that he would either hold on to the War Department and let Mr. Stanton test his right to that office in the courts, or would re sign in time to permit the President to appoint some one who would hold on, and that Gen. Grant had promised the President that he would call on him on a certain day fixed by them to let him (the President) know whether he would hold on, or resign, he (Grant) wrote the President a letter denying that he had made any such promises. The President replied that he (Grant) did make thaproraises and that he (Grant) knew he made them. Grant rejoined in a reiteration of his denial and wound up by charging the President, in an insolent manner, with trying to ennmit him (Grant) to a vio lation of the Tenure of Office "Law." The President now comes in with his rebutter and produces in support of his statement, the evidence of five mem bers of his Cabinet, who were present when Gen. Grant acknowledged that he had promised to hold on to the \\ ar Department, or resign, and also that he had agreed to meet the President and apprise him of the course he in tended to pursue, on the day specified. ; We give below the letters of the Presi dent and members of the Cabinet. Here are six of the most eminent and hon orable men in the whole Union whose testimony proves that Grant has not only acted treacherously, hut in deny ing that he had made the promises a bove described, he uttered a xcilful and deliberate falsehood. Read this corres pondence carefully and then hand to your neighbor: EXECUTIVE MANSION. Feb. 10, 'GB. General: The extraordinary cliamc- j ter of your letter of the 3d instant would seem to preclude any reply on my part; hut the manner in which publicity lias been given to the corres pondence of which that letter forms a part, and the grave questions which are involved, induce mo to take this mode of giving, as a proper sequel to the communications which have passed j between us, the statement of the five members of the cabinet who were pres ent on the occasion of our conversation on the 14th ultimo. Copies of the let ters which they have addressed to me, are accordingly herewith enclosed. You speak of my letter of the 31st ultimo as a reiteration of the many , gross misrepresentations contained in certain newspaper articles, and reassert the correctness of the statements con tained in your communication of the 2Sth ultimo, adding, (and here I give ! your own words,) "anything in yours. In reply to the contrary, notwithstaud-; ing." When a controversy upon mat ter of fact reaches the point to which this has been brought, further asser- 1 tion or denial between the immediate ; parties should cease, especially where, upon either side, it loses the character of a respectful discussion, which i.-> re quired by the relations in which the parties stand to each other, and degen erates in tone and temper. In such a, case, if there is nothing to rely upon j hut the opposing statements, conclu sions must ho drawn from the_ stide ments alone, and from whatever intrin sic probabilities they aft'ord in favor of or against either party. I should not shrink from this test in | the controversy, hut fortunately it is ! not left to this test alone. There were I five Cabinet officers present at the con versation, the detail of which, in my letter of he 28th ultimo, you allow yourself to say contains "many gross misrepresentations." These gentlemen heard that conversation, anu have read nay statement. They speak for them selves ; and I have the proof, without a word of comment- I deem it proper, j before concluding this communication, | to notice some ot the statements con- j tained in your letter. You say that a j performance of the promise alleged to; nave been made by you to the Presi-; dent "would have involved a resis-; tance to law and an inconsistency with i the whole history ot my connection with ttie suspension of Mr. Stanton," You then state that you had fears the President would, on the removal of Mr. Stanton, appoint some oue in his place who would embarrass the army in carrying out the reconstruction acu, and add: "it was to prevent such an | appointment, that I accepted the office 1 of Secretary of War, ad interim , and not for the purpose of enabling you to get rid of Mr. Stanton by mv with holding it from him in opposition to law, or, not doing so myself, SUIT ti llering it to one who would, as tiie statement and assumptions in your communication plainly indicate was sought." ... - | First of all, you hereadmit that from the very beginning of what you term "the whole history" Bf your connection with Mr. Stanton's suspension, you in tended to circumvent the President. It was to carry out that intent that you accepted the appointment. This was in your mind at the time of your accep tance. It was not, then, in obedience to the order of your superior, as has b?en heretofore supposed, that you as ! sumed the duties of the office. You knew it was tlie President's purpose i to prevent Mr. Stanton from resuming i the office of Secretary of War, and you j intended to defeat that purpose. 4 You accepted the office, not in tiie interest of the President, but of Mr. Stanton. If this purpose, so entertain ed by you, had been confined to your self; if, when accepting this office, you had have done so with a mental reser vation to frustrate the President, it would have been a tacit deception. In the ethics of some persons such a course is allowable. Rut you cannot stand upon that questionable ground. The "history" of your connection with the transaction, as written by yourself, place you in a different predicament, and shows that you not only concealed your design from the President, hut induced him to suppose that you would carry out his purpose to keep Mr. Stanton out of office by retaining it yourself, after an attempted restora tion by the Senate, so as to require Mr. Stanton to establish his right by judic ial decision. I now give that part of this 4 'history," as written by yourself in your letter of the2Bth ultimo: "Some time after 1 assumed the duties of Secretary of War ad interim, the President asked me my views as to the course Mr. Stanton would have to pursue, in ease the Sen ate should not concur in his suspension, to obtaiii possession of his office. My reply was, is substance, that Mr. Stan ton would have to appeal to the courts to reinstate him, illustrating my po sition by citingthe ground I had taken in the case ol the Baltimore police com missioners." Now, at that time, as you admit in your letter of the 3d instant, you held "the office for the very object of defeat ing an appeal to the courts. In that letter you say that in occupying the office one motive was to prevent the President from appointing some other person who would retain possession, and thus make judicial proceedings necessary. You know the president was unwil ling to trust the office with any one who would not, by holding it, compel Mr. Stanton to re>ort to the courts. You perfectly understood that in this interview, "some time" after you ac cepted the office, the President, not contented with your silence, desired an expression of your views, ami you answered him that Mr. Stanton "would have to appeal to the courts." If the President had reposed confi dence before he knew your views, and that confidence had been violated, it might have been said he made a mis take ; hut a violation of confidence re posed after tnat conversation was no mistake of his, nor of yours. It is the tact only that needs be stated, that at the date of this conversation you did not intend to hold the office with the purpose of forcing ;Mr. Stanton into court, but did hold it then and had ac cepted it to prevent that course from being carried out. In other words, you said to the President, "that is the proper course," and you said to your self, "I have accepted the office, and now hold it to defeat that course." The excuse you make—a subsequent paragraph of that letter of the 28th ultimo—that afterwards you changed your views as to what would bea prop er course, had nothing to do with the point now under consideration. The point is that before you changed your views you had secretly determined to do the very thing which at last you did—surrender the office to Mr. Stan ton. You may have changed your views as to the law, hut you certainly did not change your views as to the course you had marked out for your self from the beginning. I will only notice one more statement in your letter of the 3d inst., that the perfor mance of the promises which, it is alleged, were made by you, would have involved you in the resistance ol law. I know of no .-tatute that would have been violated had you, carrying out yourpromises in good laith, tender ed your resignation when you con cluded not to be made a party in any legal proceedings. You add; "I am in a measure confirmed in this conclu sioy by your recent orders directing iue to disobey orders from the Secre tary of War, my superior and your su bordinate, without • having counter manded his authority to issue the or ders I am to disobey." On the 24th ultimo you addressed a note to the President requesting, in writing, an order given to you verbally five days before, to disregard orders from Mr. Stanton as Secretary of War until you "knew troin the President himself that they were his orders." Oil the29th, in compliance with your request, I did give you instructions in writing "not to obey any order* from the War Department assumed to he Is sued by the direction of the President, | unless such order is known by the gen eral commanding the armies of the U nited States to have been authorized by ; the Executive." There are some orders whi -h aSeere- j tsry of War may issue without the; authority of the President; there are , others which Jie issued simply as the, agent of the President, and wnich pur ports to he "by direction" of the Presi- ! dent. For such orders the president is responsible, and lie should thereibre know and understand what they are! before giving such "directions." Mr. Stanton states, in his letter of the 4th inst., which accompanies the publish ed correspondence, that he "has had| no correspondence with the President since the I2tli August hen;" and he further says that since he resumed the | duties of the office he has continued to j discharge them "without any personal or written communication with the Presidentand he adds!, "no orders have been issued from tlii- department in the name of the President with my knowledge, and I have received no orders from him." it thus seems that Mr. Stanton now discharges the duties of the War Department without any reference to the President and without Using hjs| name. My order to you had only reference to orders "assumed to he issued by direction of the President." It would appear from Mr. Stanton's letter that you have received no such orders from )llm, However, in your note to 111e President of the 30th ultimo, in which you acknowledge Hie receipt of the written order of the 29th, you say that you have been informed by ijr. Sjian-| ton that iielias not received any tiKH-r limiting his authority to issue orders to theariny according to the practice of the Department, and Mate that "while this! authority tothe War Department Is not j countermanded, it will be stisfuctory evidence to me that any orders issued from the War Department by direction of the President are authorized by the Executive." The President issues an order to you 1 to obey no order from the War Depart- j ment, purporting to he made "by the direction of the President," until you have referred it to him for his appro val. You reply that you have receiv ed the President's order and will not ol>ey it, but will obey an order purpor j ting to be given by his direction if Tt | Ctmes from the War Department. \ o;i will not obey the direct order of* the President, but- will obey his indirect : order, if, as you say tliere has been a practice in the war Department to! issue orders in the name of the Presi-1 dent, without his direction, does not. the precise ord< r you have requested and have received change the practice as to the general of the army? Could not the President conn ermand any I such commands issued to you from the ; War Department? If you should re-j ; ceivean order from the War Depart- I ment, issued in the name of the Presi i dent, to do a special act, and an order from the President directly, not to do the act, is there a doubt which you ought to obey? You answer the question when you say to the President, in your letter of the 3d instant, the Secretary of War is "my superior and your subordinate,'' and yet you refuse obedience to the superior out of deference to the subor dinate. Without further com ment up on the subordinate attitude you have assumed, I am at a loss to know how you can release yourself from obedience to the orders of the President, who is made by the constitution commander in-chief of the army and navy, and is, therefore, the official superior as well of the General of the Army as of tiie Sec retary of War. ANDREW JOHNSON. Genera! U. S. Grant, commanding armies of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. Copy of letter addressed to each of the members of the Cabinet present al the conversation between the President and General Grant on the 14 of Janu ary, 1808: KXECU'IUVE MANSION, Washington, D. C\, Feb. o, 1808. Sir: The Chronicle of this morning contains a correspondence between the President and Gen. Grant, reported from the War Department, in answer to a resolution of the House of Repre sentatives. I beg to call your attention to that correspondence, and especially to that part of it which refers to the conversation between the President and Gen. Grant at the Cabinet meet ing on the 14th of January, and to re quest you to state what was said in that conversation. Very respectfully yours, ANDREW JOHN ON. WASHINGTON, D. C., Feb. ,3, iscs. Sir: Your note of this date was hand ed to me thisevening. My recollection of the conversation at theCahinet meet ing, 011 Tuesday, the 14th of January, corresponds with your statement of it in the letter of the 31st ult., in the published correspondence. The three points specified in the fbtter, giving your recollection of the conversation, are correctly stated. Very respect'y, GIDEON WELLES. To the President. TREASURY DEPT., Feb. 9, ISGB. Sir: 1 have received your note of the oth inst., calling my attention to tin correspondence between yourself and General Grant, published 111 the Chron icle of yesterday, especially to that pail of it which relates to what recurred at "Cabinet meeting" on Tuesday, the 14th ultimo, and requesting me to state what was said in ttie conversation r'e ferred to. 1 cannot undertake to state tlie pre cise language used, but I have 110 hesi tation in saying that your account ol the conversation, given in your letter to General Grant of the 31st ultimo, substantially, and in all important particulars, accords with my recollec tion of it. With great respect, your obedient ser vant. HUGH MCCULLOCH. To the President. POSTOFITCE DEPA RT.MENT, Washington, Feb. 6, 18G8. Sir: I am in receipt of your letter ol February,calling my attention to the correspondence published in the Chron icle between the President and Gener al Grant, and especially to that part 01 it which refers to the conversation be tween the President and General Grant at the Cabinet meeting 011 Tuesday, the 14th of January, with a request that I state what was sai l in that conversa tion. In reply, I have the honor to state that 1 have read carefully the corres pondence in question, and particularly the letter of the President to General Grant, dated January 31, 18G8. The following extract from your let ter of the 31*t of January to General Grant is, according to my recollection, a correct statement of the conversation that took place between the Preside n and General Grant in the Cabinet meet ing 011 the 11th of January last. In the presence of the Cabinet the Presi dent asked General Grant whether "in conversation which took place after his appointment as secretary of War ad interim lie did not agree either to remain at the head of the War Depart ment and abide any judical proceed ings that might follow tiie non-concur rence by tlie Senate in Mr. Stanton's suspension, and should he wish not to become involved in such a controver sy, to put the President in the same position with repeet to the ojfice as hej occupied previous to General Grant's appoint ment,by returning it to the Pres ident in time to anticipate such action by the Senale." "This General Grant admitted. The President then asked General Grant ii at the conference on the preceding Sat urday hp had not, to avoid misunder standing, requested Genoflll Grant to statewhat fie intended to do; and fur ther, if in reply to that inquiry he (Gen eral Grant) had not referred to theii former conversations, saying that from them the President understood his po sition. and that his (Genera! Grant's) action would be consistent with the un derstanding which had "been reached. To these General Grant replied in the affirmative. The President asked Gen era) Grant if at the conclusion of their interview<;H 'Saturday it was not un-1 derstood that they were tohaveanoth J er conference on Monday, before IF; nal action by the Senate in the ease of Mr. Stanton. General Grant replied that such was the understanding, hut that he did not suppose the Senate would act so soon : that on Monday he had been engaged in a conference with General Sherman, am} was occupied with "many little matters," and asked "ifGenera! Sherman had riot called on that dav." I take this mode of complying with the request contained in the President's letter to me, because my attention Inc hed! called to the subject before, when the correspondence between the Presi dent and General Grant was under con sideration , Very respectfully, your obediant ser vant, AI.EX \NDKR W. RANDALL, Postmaster General. DEPARTMENT OE THE INTERIOR, I Washington, D. C. Feb. G, 18G8,) Sir: I am in receipt of yours of yes terday calling my attention to a corres pondence between yourself and Gener al Grant published in the Chronicle newspaper, and especially to that part of said correspondence-"which referred to the conversation between the Presi dent and General Grant at the Cabinet meeting on 1 uesday, the 14th of Janua ry," and requesting me "to state what was said in that connection." In reply, I submit the following statement: At the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, the Mill January, 1868, General Grant appeared and took his accustomed scat at the board. When lie had been reached in the order of business, the President asked him, as usual, if he had anything to present. In reply the general, after referring toa note which he had that morning address ed to the President, enclosing a y of the resolution of the Senate refusing to concur in the reasons for the suspeie sioti of Mr. Stanton, proceeded to say that he regarded his duties as Secretary of War ad interim terminated by that resolution, and that he could not law fully exercise such duties for a moment aft< r~ the adoption of the resolution reached him last night, and that this morning lie had gone to the War de partment, entered the secretary's room, bolted one door on the inside, locked the other on the outside, deliv ered the key to tiie adjutant general, 'and proceeded to tiie headquarters of the army and addressed the note above mentioned to the President, informing him that lie (General Grant) was no longer Secretary of War ad interim. The President expressed great sur prise at the course which Gen. Grant had thought proper to pursue, and, ad dressing himself to the General, pro ceeded to, say in substance, that he had anticipated such action on the part ofthe Senate, and being very desirous to have the constitutionality of the ten ure-of-oflice bill tested, and his right to suspend or remove a member of the Cabinet decided by tl e judicial trihu nnlsof the country, lie had, some time ago, and shortly after Gen. Grant's ap pointment as Secretary of War ad inter im, asked the General what his action would be in theevent that the Senate should refuse to concur in the suspen sion of Mr. Stanton, and that the Gen eral had then agreed either to remain at the head of the War Department till a decision could he obtained from the court, nr resign the office in o the hands of the President before the ca>e was acted upon by the Senate, so as to place the President in the same situa he occupied at the time of his (Grant's) appointment. The President further said that the conversation was renewed on the pre ceding Saturday, at which lime he ask ed tiie General what he intended to do if the Senate should undertake to re instate Mr. Stanton, in reply to which the General referred to their former conversation upon tne same subject, and said "you understand my posi ion, and my conduct, will be conformable to that understanding:" that he (the General) then expressed a repugnance to.being made a party to judicial pro ceeding, saying that lie wouid expose himself to tine and imprisonment by doing so, us his continuing todischarge the duties of Secretary of War ad inter im after the Senate should have refus ed to concur in the suspension of Mr. Stanton would beaviolaitonoftheten ure-of-offlce bill. That in reply to this he, the Presi dent, informed Gen. Grant he had not suspended Mr. Stanton under the ten ure-of-office bill, hut by virtue of the powers conferred on him by the consti tution. and that as to the tine and im prisonment he, the t resident, would pay whatever fine was imposed, and submit to whatever imprisonment might be adjudged against him, the General. That they continued thecon versation for some time, discussing the law at length, and that they finally separated without having reached a definite conclusion, and with the un derstanding that the General would see the President again on Monday. In reply. Gen. Grant admitted that the conversation had occurred, and said that at first conversation he had given it as his opinion to the President that in the event of non-concurrence by the Senate in the action of the Presi dent in respect to the Secretary of War, the question would have to he decided by the court; that Mr. Stanton would have to appeal to the court to reinstate him in office; that the im would re main in until they could he displaced and the outs put in by legal proceed ings; and that he then thought so, and had agreed that if lie should change his mil d "he would notify the President in time to make another appointment; but that, at the timed' the first conver sation, lie had not looked very closely into the law; that it had recently been discussed by the newspapers, and that this had induced him to examine it more carefully, and tiiat he had come to the conclusion that if the Senate should refuse to concur in the suspen sion Mr. Stanton would thereby be re instated, and i hat lie (Grant) could not continue to act as Secretary of War ad interim without subjecting himself to fine and imprisonment; and that he came over 011 Saturday to inform the President of the change in his views, and did so inform him; that the Pres ident replied that he had not suspen ded Mr. Stanton under the tenure-of office bill, but under the constitution, and had appointed him —Grant—by virtue of the authority derived from the constitution, \t Itcndinjj: The Clly .Swept: A (i:|in of Four liuud rod and One. RKADIXG, Feb. 15. —The election for Auditor, Council men, and others, took place yesterday. The Democrats swept the city and routed the Radicals, horse, foot, and dragoon. The Auditor, Hiester M. Xagle, was elected by a majority 0f382. Last year the Radical majority was ID, which makes a clear Democratic gain of lui over the vote of last fall. There were no local issues to influ ence the election. The battle was fought out squarely, on the gruitnds of principle. Rknit sets of candidates werp trustworthy. There Is great rejoicirtg here over the result, The majority will be in creased when the great and final con test comes, A WAR ox HUMANITY.—The New York World publishes a letter from a Georgia correspondent which presents a very dark side of the reconstruction policy. It appears that in Mississippi a trifling gift of sugar and tea by Gen. Gillem to the State Insane Asylum re veals the i'act that such articles are al most unknown to the patients in that institution, and that it is only by the most rigid economy that the bare ne • essaries of life can be furnished them, After detailing a similar case in Geor gia, the editor adds i ♦'As no power is given these com mandants to fully relieve such necessi ties, and MS .state appropriations areex hausted, it is not impossible that the most painful distresses may be felt by just those very classes that in any de cent community are the most fully provided for and watched over. That lhese disgraceful probabilities are the legitimate result of congressional re eonstruction cannot be denied, and we beg any man who has the honor and fair fame of his country at heart to re flect if tlie existence of these wrongs in two States does r.ot argue for their per petration in all the other States where j the same general cause is at work." —A specific against falling on ice may be found in the old penitential recipe, sackcloth and ashes; sackcloth for the soles and ashes for the streets. SEWS ASD OTHER ITEMS. —A planter, residing near Beaufort, S. C., went to recover his mules, which were stolen by a party of negroes, last week. lie was met by a large force of freed men, who wrested his gun from his hands and shot him dead on the spot. —The New Orleans colored Alder man Dumas, who refused to accept the nomination for Lieutenant Governor, on the ground that he was "a candi date for Governor only," is among the persons just removed from office by General Hancock for "contempt of or ders from headquarters." The following prices are paid for labor in Austin, Nevada: Ordinary j labor $3.~i0 a day, or $(5O and found per month; skillful miners, $1 to $5 per; day; carpenters, s."> to $7 per day; wood ; in quantities, to mills, rk- feb2luil. SUDDEN DEATH is the late of every fihre upon which the Caustic Poison of an ordinary hair dye falls. There is no * Ressitrrcction for the filaments thus b.igbted. But. as it were, in the Twinkling of an Eye, hair of nny obuoxious col. r is changed to a Rich and Glorious Hue, and at the same'time vitalized and improved by the use of CRISTA DO LLO'S lIA IK DYE, nature's s ife ally, and beauty s regenerator Manufactured by J. CHISTADOKO, fid Maiden Lane, New York. Sold by all Druggists. Ap plied by all Hair Dressers. fob2lml SPECIAL NOTICES. FACTS. That we have unequalled facilities for conduct ing business to the advantage both of ourselves and patrons, we submit the following TRUTHS — well known as such to the entire business commu nity. Ist. We have abundant rash capital, therefore— 2d. We are enabled to Buy for Cas^ridutive ly, consequently at the lowest possible prices, with the markets of theentire world toselect from. 3d. In this particular WE ITAVB ADVANTAGE* shared by tio other house in our business. 4th. We sell for cash exclusively—therefore t the lowest possible prices—having no losses incurred by selling on credit, to provide for. 6th We have a business experience of a quarter of a century, having been.longer established than any house in our trade in Pbilad. lphia. 6th. Our business is thoroughly sys'etnaiized, the result of long experience, which has taught us what the wants of the public are, and how best to meet them. £ 7th. We employ the best talent in all departments, our garments are therefore unsurpassed in style, fit and workmanship. Bth. 0 r business is large and constantly, increas ing, enabling us to keep at alt times the lar gest. best assorted, and most complete .stork oj MEN S, YOU'IHS', and BOYs' CLO'lil- IXti in Philadelphia, to which large daily additions are made of fresh goods, replacing those sold. 9th. For reasons already enumerated we can. and do sell clothing in every respect superior— surpassed by none, equalled bv few—at pri ces guaranteed in alt rases lower than the the lowest elsewhere, or the Balecunuelled and money refunded. 10th. If buyers should for any cause become dissat isfied after a purchase is made, if reported witbiu a reasonable time.we pledge ourselves, by exchange, refunding of money . or other wise, to give full satisfaction in every case, and request thut all such may be reported to us for adjustment. CARD. —Our stock of Fall and Winter Clothing is full and complete, and selling rapidly, but is as rapidly replenished each day wi'h fresh and desi rable styles of new goods, purchased recently, for cash, at great sacrifices, enabling us to sell at pri ces lower than have beeu known for years. Con gratulating our patrons upon the decliue of prices, which enables us to offer superior garments at such low rates, we request the favor of a call. Halftoty between j BENNETT A 0., Fifth and > TOWER HALL., Sixth streets \ 518 MARKET ST., PHIL VDKLPHIA. jan3m6*| And 600 Broadway, NEW YORK. ADDRESS TO THE N EKVOUS AND DE BILITATED whoie sufferings hire been protracted from hideous causes, and whose cases require prompt treatment to render existence desirable. If you are suffering or have suffered from involun tary discharges, what effect does it produce upon your general health ? Do \ou feel weak, debilita ted, easily tired ? little extra exertion pro duce palpitation of the heart ? Does your liver, or urinary organs, or your kidneys, frequently get out of order ? Is your urine sometimes thick, milky, or flocky, or is it ropy on settling' Or does a thick scum rise to the top? Or is a sediment at • he bottom after it has stood awhile? Do you have spells of short breathing or dyspepsia ? Are your bowels constipated? Do you have spells of fainting or rushes of blood to the head ? Is your memory im paired? Is your mind constantly dwelling upon ihissubject? Do you feel dull, listless, moping, tired of company, of life 7 Do you wish to oe left alone, to get away from everybody ? Does any lit tle thing make you start or jump ? Is y.iur sleep broken or restless? Is the lustre of your eye as brilliant? The bloom on your cheek as bright? Do you enjoy yourself in society as well? Do you pursue your business with the same energy ? Do you feel as much confidence in yourselt ? Are your spy-its dull and flagging, given to fits or mel ancholy ? If so, do cot lay it to your liyer or dyspepsia. Have you restless -nights ? Your back weak, your knees weak, and have but little appe tite. and you attribute this to dyspepsia or liver complaint ? Now, reader, sell-abuse, venereal diseases badly cured, and sexual excesses, are al, capable of pro ducing a weakness of the generative organs. The organs of generation, when in perfect health, make the man. Did you ever think that those bold, de fiant, energetic, persevering, successful business men are always those whose generative organs are in perfect health ? You never hear such men complain of being melancholy, of nervous ness, of palpitation of the heart. They are nev er afraid they cannot succeed in business ; they don't become sad and discouraged ; they are al ways polite and pleasant iu theoompany of ladies, and look you and them right in the face—none ot your downcast looks or any other meanness about them. Id t not me m those who-keep the orgaus inflamed by running to excess. These will not only ruin their constitutions, but also those they do business with or for. How many m n from badly-cured diseases, from the effects of self-abuse and exce.-seg, have brought about that state of weakness in those orgaus that has reduced the general system so much as to in duce almost every other disease —idiocy, luuacy, paralysis, spinal affections, suicide, and almost every other torui of disease which humanity is heir to, and the teil cause of the trouble scarcely ev er suspected, and have doctored for all hut the right one. Diseases of these organs require the use of a diu retic. HELMBOED'S FLUID EX lit AC! BUClll" is the great Diuretic, and is a certain cute for diseases of the Bladder, Kidneys, Gravel, Dropsy, Organic Weakness, Female Complaints, General Debility, and all diseases of"the Urinary Organs, whether existing in Male or Female, from wnat ever cause originating and no in tier how long standing If no treatment is submitted to, Consumption or lusauitymay ensue. Our flesh aud blood are sup ported from these sources, and the health and happiness, and that of Posterity, depends upon prompt use of a reliatle remedy. llcluibold'a Extract Buchu, established upward of I!l years, prepared by 11. T. HELMBOLD, Druggist, 594 Broadway, New York, lUi South 10th Street, Pnitadclphia, Pa. Pkick — sl.2s per bottle, or 6 bottles for $0 50, delivered to any address. Sold by all Drug gists everywhere. iuarh,'ti7yl To CONSUMPTIVES.— The lie v. ED WARD A. WILSON will send (free of charge) to all who desire it. the prescription with the direction* for making and using the simple remedy by which he was cured of a lung a Beet ion and that dread disease Consumption, liis only objeot is to bene fit the afflicted and he hopes every sufferer will try this prescription, as it will cost them nothing, and may prove a blessing Please address Rev. EDWARD A WILSON. No. 165 South Second Street, Williamsburgh, New York. epl3tnB ITCH ! ITCH !! ITCH !!! — Svtxtich .* Scratch ' Scratch ■' ■' ■' —ln from 10 48 hours WH BATON'S OINTMENT cures THE ITCH. WHKATON'S OINTMENT cures SALT RHEUM. WHEATON'S OINTMENT cures TETTER. WIIEATON'S OINTMENT cures Barbers' Itch. WHEATON'S OINTMENT eures Old Sorer. WHKATON'S OINTMENT cures pvery kind of Humor like Magic. Price. 50 cents a box ; by mail, 60 cents. Ad dress WEEKS A POTTER, No. 170 Washington Street, Boston, Mass. For sale by all Druggists. sep2o,'67yl INFORMATlON. —lnformation guar anteed to produce a luxuriant growth of hair up on a bald head or beardless faoe, also a recipe for the removal of Pimples, Blotches, Eruptions, etc., on the skin, leaving the same jolt, clear, and beau tiful. ean be obtained without charge by address ing TUGS. F. CHAPMAN, Chemist, 823 Broad way, New York, sepl3mB CANCER, SCROFULA,