Lancaster farming. (Lancaster, Pa., etc.) 1955-current, November 29, 2003, Image 26
A26-Lancaster Farming, Saturday, November 29. 2003 , • L ( \ it r \t' t « > I l r — 1 r- ' > 1 ' i Bill Could Have Jeopardized Farmland Preservation (Continued from Page A 1) bill are pleased with the result. “Grange is extremely pleased that there was an overwhelming vote to preserve farmland in Pennsylvania,” said Brenda Shambaugh, legislative director for Pennsylvania State Grange. “The precedent set, once an agri culture restriction is in place, it remains intact. We (the Grange) would like to thank the legisla tors who voted to defeat this leg islation and support agriculture in Pennsylvania.” However, Shambaugh notes that this bill could be reconsid ered at a later date, because a re consideration vote was taken and passed. “Pennsylvania Farm Bureau appreciates the vote, but we also know the legislation may be brought back for more considera tion soon,” said Guy Donaldson, president of Pennsylvania Farm Bureau. Donaldson noted, “We recog nize that all members of the House are concerned about the preservation of farmland in the commonwealth. In this instance, some have been tempted to stray from their convictions. Because passage of the legislation would set harmful precedents for farm land preservation in Pennsylva nia, we’re hopeful that our law makers will ultimately give this This 22-acre property pictured from Jackson Run road in front of the Warren State Hospital Complex is at the heart of Pennsylvania’s farmland preservation con troversy. House Bill 66, which was defeated Tuesday in the House of Representa tives, proposed to remove agriculture restrictions on the property for commercial development. Lancaster Forming's Clossifitd Ads Got Results! CAU. TODAY and get a TRIPLE PLAY on the best value and pre-season offer In hey equipment. Offer valla until January 31,20 m. Soo your loeol dialer for dotalla, forma i conditions. tut#a»cnritt appro* by Wend* AcogtannUX WarmaarCmW man* Iw right to Inlarpnt nwtty or caned Mai program* at anytkrw without nafcaoroMgatton VERMEER and VfmwtiogD in rtgMrtdtraritmarlaalVtmwM Manufacturing Co In Iht US and/or othtr countdit. © 2003 Vimiaar Manufacturing Co All Higittt NtHrvtd legislation a proper burial.” The Pennsylvania Farm Bu reau and Pennsylvania State Grange stepped up their grass roots efforts to defeat this bill in the days before its vote in the House. Both organizations plan to monitor the status of the bill. If passed, the bill could set pre cident not only for state-owned farmland, but also for Pennsylva nia’s farmland preservation pro grams. “We think it is a dangerous precedent issue,” said Don aldson. “If this happens, what does it do to our farmland preser vation program?” One component of the bill was the permitting the transfer of the agricultural restrictions on the 22 acres to a 46-acre site in Elk Township. Donaldson expressed concerns, that, if allowed, the bill could impact agricultural land preservation programs, opening the door for ag restriction move ments. “We are very pleased that the House has voted to maintain the integrity of the Ag Land Preser vation program,” said State Grange Master Betsy Huber. “Permanently preserved land should be just that, permanent, with no transfer of the easement permitted without a very impor tant reason for the public good. Any weakening of the program The annual Penn State Hybrid Reports are part . and parcel of the Jan. 31 issue of Corn talk in \|||m Lancaster Farming. Also scheduled is a feature from a Columbia County 5-Acre Corn Club winner, silage reports, meeting updates, and a calendar of crop growing and management events. would have a negative effect on future covenants.” Heidi Schellenger, executive director of Lancaster Farmland Trust (LFT), noted that LFT has been remaining aware of the bill’s activity because of the impact it could have on easements. “We need to maintain the sanctity of an easement,” said Schellenger, stressing that an easement “is a perpetual promise” to protect farmland. House Bill 66 was introduced at the beginning of the imple mentation of Warren County : s comprehensive plan. The plan was developed to generate eco nomic growth for the county. According House Bill 66, War- ren County is facing sever al economic challenges, such as an unemployment rate of 19 percent, decreas ing county population, and a high percentage of coun ty lands owned by the state or federal government, which limits the county tax base. However, as the defeat of House Bill 66 will forbid the development of the ag riculture lands, other op tions are available for de velopers in Warren County. One option, a brownfield located to the west of War- TIMETOBUYI purchase before 12/31/03 /also be qualified to 10% (or up to $lOO,OOO of vent purchased in 20031)* tionSactton ITSDundttton ti.cs <kkW In thiJax RiM KHittionAclo(2oo3 Vernier www.¥Brmerag.com * ▼ Vormoor Manufacturing Co. Polio, U 50312 800-370-3859 0% finance and NO PAYMENTS for 12 months...or 0% finance for i onanllaini fliialitu 24 months on many Badger products WSgCHUiHiy Mud Illy it Products! www.badgerfarmequipment.com Annville Everett BHM Farm Equlpmeht C. Paul Ford & Son, 717-867-2211 Inc. 814-652-0095 ren, is a possibility for develop ment. Formerly a manufacturing fa cility, located on Rt. 6, brown field owner Cindy Morrison stresses her family is actively looking to revitalize it. Calling the brownfield “blighted,” Mor rison believes that a proposed Wal-Mart would help to revital ize the area. Vacant since 1995, the proper ty is home to three manufactur ing plants. Working with Cam bridges Services, Morrison is “expecting a contact from Wal- Mart,” with the defeat of House Bill 66. Warren County Commission er-elect David Bauer said he does They all ran better with genuine Badger parts. 0% CFS Lancaster D Wa * s . on A to , w D n 717-243-4419 Show-Ease Stall Co. Rovßnda j ß *0 & Barn 717-299-2536 570-538-9564 Chambersburg CFS Oley 717-264-3533 Piksville Equipment 610-987-6277 not know what the outgoing Warren County Board of Com missioners will do next in react ion to the bill’s defeat. However, Bauer said, “No matter what happens, the new board has to handle the fallout.” Bauer noted that Warren County does not have a county farmland preservation program. He is confident that, as he and the new commissioner board takes office on Jan. 5, it will change. “Warren County will be the next county to join the state farmland conservation program. It’s about time we looked at how we use our natural resources.” i • ’• Troy Fallbrook Fabrication 570-297-3802