Com Silage Quality: What Can You Expect This Year? UNIVERSITY PARK (Centre Co.) What will the quality of this year’s corn silage crop be? In recent years, advances in forage analysis and ration balancing programs have generated additional infor mation as to how forages are utilized by the cow. The availability of this informa tion has generated increased interest in the correlation be tween weather patterns and forage quality. What will the quality of this year’s crop be? Several specialists have of fered a number of theories based on their observations from years with similar weather patterns with 1996 being the most recent. Corn silage harvested in that year did not ferment very rapidly or efficiently. Many dairy producers and their nutri tional advisers complained that cows did not increase production until late Decem ber or January when fed corn silage produced in 1996. Examination of informa tion provided by Dr. Greg Roth, corn specialist with Penn State University, and Kurt Ruppel, dairy specialist for Pioneer Hi-Bred Interna tional, Inc., may provide some insight as to the quality of this year’s corn silage. As most of the Northeast has received an abundance of rainfall, corn silage quality will most likely be less than optimal. Tall plants can result in lower grain-to-stalk ratio, unless the plants have multiple ears. Research at the Miner In stitute in New York has illus trated that lignin levels in corn plants increases in wet weather, thus decreasing fiber and whole plant digesti bility. (Hg) GSI Grain Bins — 7 Grain Dryers (gg) Elevators Augers from Westfield @) AFFORDABLE QUALITY and From Hutchison SONES grain SYSTEMS Muncy, PA (570) 584-2282 m m m isl Data from other institu tions and from field observa tions supports the Miner Institute observations. One solution may be to chop silage with the head set higher than normal. Re search at Pioneer, Penn State, and other universities has il lustrated that chopping silage higher than usual (12 to 18-inches) decreases NDF levels and increases whole plant digestibility. However, this practice reduces total yield and actually results in less milk per acre. Results of a Penn State study indicate a one-ton loss in dry matter yield, but a 1.5- point decrease in the NDF content of corn silage with a 12-inch change in cutting height. Similar results from Pioneer indicate an increase of 72 pounds of milk per ton of silage, but a loss of 258- pounds of milk per acre. If forage supplies are abundant this year, and they should be, the reduction in yield may be less of a negative factor. Before accepting a blanket recommendation to high chop corn silage, examine the whole farm effects of your de cision. Evaluate the decision based on total forage supply and quality. Improving the quality of corn silage may be desirable, as much of the hay crops are already of lower quality. Improving overall forage quality is especially important for high producing herds. Be sure to consider the long-term ramifications on milk components and milk pricing. Dr. Satter at the U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center in Wisconsin evalu ated harvest height of “well matured” corn silage. The comparison was made be- m Floor) 201