etVSPer ,s wtowati .ytiovjieS £W»w«J A32-Lancaster Farming, Saturday, December 2 r 1995 Chesapeake Bay Executive Council Approves Local Initiative (Continued from Pag* Ai) • work to increase the number of cific geographical areas, like «*M governments. local government representatives Maryland’s Patuxent River, where Its pesticide statement preface The Chesapeake Bay Program on its committees and point source nitrogen removal begins with an explanation of the -JJ"" ° Executive Council includes Virgi- subcommittees; techniques arc in place, and the fact that in October 1994 the coun- . allv va |„ aMt , nia Gov. George Allen, who serves • develop a series of local govern- tidal fresh James River in Virginia, cil adopted the Chesapeake Bay According to thestatement as chairman, Pennsylvania Gov. ment “indicators” by July 1,1996, where pollution prevention tech- Basinwide Toxics Reduction and k v die executive council Tom Ridge, Maryland Gov. Pams which show the status and progress niques are showing benefits." Prevention Strategy. **rhis fulfill* nnr nledvr mad* hy Glendening, District of Columbia m restonng resources under the q ln other environmental “As part of that strategy, we . A^o^eE^ecutivcCouncil Mayor Marion Barry, U.S. Envir- authority of local governments; impn)veine nts. the council stated agreed to manage the use of pcsti- wScoiiiataßd. . onmental Protection Agency • prepare a “handbook for local that there have been significant cides to prevent adverse effects on Administrator Carol Browner, and governments” that would identify reductions in toxic chemicals living resources and human health TOhcy on the intro- Chesapeake Bay Commission projects and programs local gov- released into the Bay basin. within the Chesapeake Bay basin, duction of Nomndigcnous Aquatic Chairman Michael Weir. emments can do to help support According to the news release, “We further committed to cstab- Species to establish a panel con- Thc emphasis of the agreement efforts for Bay protection and die amount of toxic chemicals lish, by 2000, voluntary integrated sutmg of user groups, federal ana is to emphasize the importance of restoration: released by industries within the pest management practices on 75 state othcr interested local efforts to increase the effec- • establish a program to recognize Bay’s basin has decreased by more percent of all agricultural, recrea- parties to identify to tiveness of strategies to protect local governments’achievements; than 52 percent between 1988 and tional, and public lands, within the reduce the risks associated with the tibutaries within the Chesapeake • convene a conference by October 1993. (The national average rcduc- Bay basin.” discharge of ballast water into the Bay basin. to showcase local government tion was 42 percent) According to the adopted state- Chesapeake Bay. “Much of our success to date has innovations in protecting the Bay The council also cited the fact ment, ”... we adopt as part of the .By adopting the recommenda becn due to locally developed site- and local environments. that 300 miles of riverway Chesapeake Bay Basinwide Tox- Uons.w support the reaumonza and situation-specific solutions,” • identify public information docu- within the basin has been reopened ics Reduction and Prevention tion of the Nomndigenous Aquatic Gov. Allen stated in a news ments and other means of commu- to mieratory fish needing to swim Strategy, the following additional Prevention and Control release. nications which can be tailored for “privCT toreach spawning areas, goal: Actof 1990, the implementation of “And now, for the first time, loc- local governments. The goal of the program is to “Develop and conduct basin- a national program of voluntary ally elected officials will be Also during the council meet- have 1,357 miim reopened to wide education and outreach prog- ballast water management guide assured an essential role in the fag, members reviewed a report migratory fish by 2003. The rams for commercial and house- rc £”S ng procc