A2O-LancaaW Panting, Saturday, July 22, 1995 Vanishing Acres: Despite Development Pressure, Farmers Find Ways To Thrive Part 2 of 3 Editor's Note: In part one of the Vanishing Acres series, far mers spoke about their experi ences when dealing with residen tial neighbors. In part two, far mers learn to deal with and profit from the challenges. It has become increasingly diffi cult for agriculture to remain a way of life in communities such as Lancaster County. Due to rapid growth, many organizations talk of preserving farmland as part of our landscape without thought to pre serving the economic nobility of farmers. \ Jeff Stoltzfus Adult Farmer Instructor Eastern Lancaster County Ressler admits that choosing to develop land is ‘more profitable than the difficult, uphill production battle that keeps the land in production Sprawling residential develop ment that destroys farmland imposes a net financial loss on the coffers of local communities, inhi biting their ability to, among other things, fund quality school sys tems, according to a new analysis of three Minnesota towns recently released by the Land Stewardship Project and the American Farm land Trust.... Farmland protec tion may be financially beneficial not only because of its contribution to the lax base, but also because it holds down property tax valuation. Excerpt From “Farmland And The Tax Bill: The Cost Of Community Services In Three Minnesota Cities” The Land Stewardship Project St. Croix, Minn. In a 13-year span, between 1982 and 1995, about3o,ooo acres have been lost in Lancaster County . Farmland is being lost at a rate of 2,000 acres per year. ANDY ANDREWS Lancaster Fanning Staff LANSDALE (Montgomery Co.) —Like the saying, Fred Seipl knows how to turn a lemon into lemonade. p i “SIMPLY the BEST * 1 t4M Rf WTS IWUaT*iSBffVX<.