Lancaster farming. (Lancaster, Pa., etc.) 1955-current, February 06, 1982, Image 34
A34—Lancaster Farming, Saturday, February 6,1982 Del. Holstein breeders elect officers CLAYTON, De. The Delaware Holstein Breeders Association held their annual meeting on Saturday, January 23 at the Eastbum farm (Continued from Page A 22) when they are due. This cooperative arrangement of direct trading is being encouraged by countries like Mexico, Bergland stated, because it does not threaten national security. In countries like Japan, Bergland pointed out, the gover nment pays exorbitant price supports to its dairy and beef producers even though it would be far cheaper for them to import the meat and dairy products from the U.S. “They’ve retreated with the knowledge that it’s dangerous for them to become so vulnerable, that they’ve got to maintain the sem blance of a beef economy and a dairy economy even if it costs them a bundle. Because if they were to allow their country to be taken up in imports in all regards, they would be completely helpless if there was an embargo or war.’’ This type of attitude, said Bergland, is common throughout the world. “It doesn’t need to prevent trade,” he said, “but must be addressed and realized as we start contemplating the future.” Bergland forecast that cooperatives will have about three years to fashion programs, energies and attentions to feeding a hungry world. In stUl another prediction, the former Secretary of Agriculture announced tus belief that farmers will never see another farm program. “There’s a big argument these days about federal budgets, farm income, and the role of government programs and market orders, and the entire spectrum of traditional kinds of federal farm programs. I’m convinced that this program we now have is probably the last program we’ll ever have in any Congress of the United States.” Bergland, who served six years as a Minnesota congressman, said the toughest problem he faced during his time in Washington, was convincing urban legislators that a farm program was in their best interest. “I am convinced that govern ment price supports will be to the farm economy what minimum wages are to the working world no profit in a job at $3 an hour. And the pressures against passing programs that guarantee a decent return on your investment and for your time are immense because people are convinced that the benefits go to big farms that the small farms don’t really share in the benefits of these programs.” Bergland added that he became convinced during his last three years with USD A “that the old days of marketing quotas, acreage allotments and higher price supports were probably not possible again given the political situation in Congress.” He con fessed he was “fed up” with a number of federal programs that were passed under the premise of saving the family farm, citing cases of Farmers Home Ad ministration loans to “persons who had incredibly bad business judgement, that were huge in their scale. We had 200 loans that were more than $1 million a piece for so called emergency credit, and not enough money to help people get started.” Under this direction, USDA organized and published the “Structure Study”, an attempt to “get down to brass tacks” and find out where the USDA benefits were going. This study also identified where the strength in our nation’s agriculture lies, the family farm. “There are 2.6 million farms in near Clayton. About 75 people attended. Dan Vanderwende was elected president of the Association, and Bergland our country today. Of that number, 1.7 million have income, gross sales, of under $20,000 a piece, and together produce only 10 percent of that which finds its way to the market place. These 1.7 million farms, with $27 billion income in nonfarm wages, don’t depend on price supports or market orders because they’re not in the business of farming for a living. “On the other extreme, there are 60,000 farms in the U.S. with gross sales of more than $200,000 a piece that produce 40 percent of everything that finds its way, to the market place. And those big farms walk off with the lion’s share of the farm subsidies. “The myth is that those are the efficient farms. The fact is they’re not because if the federal subsidies were withdrawn from those 60,000 large scale farms, for the most part, they couldn’t make it go. “In between, then, we have about 800,000 farms that we commonly call the commercial family farm average gnwo income at $150,000 a piece. Big enough to keep a family busy, big enough to use modern fanning techniques, small enough so that the decisions are made by the family itself. Some people feel that kind of family agriculture is a vanishing breed, not strong. The fact is, that kind- of family agriculture is the most resour ceful, energetic, efficient structure in farming in the U.S. today.” One of the enemies of the family farm today, according to Bergland, is farmland inflation escalated values of land which can be mortgaged toward expansion of farms and which prohibit young people from entering the field because of the extreme costs. Government subsidies aren’t the answer, said Bergland, because they would not benefit those who need them the most. He suggested revamping the tax strategy in the U.S. and putting limits on land speculation. “We ought to establish a credit policy that says we’re going to provide meaningful credit assistance to those who want to start, and those who want to im prove and modernize but there’s a limit. Once they’ve achieved a size that’s big enough to use all the modern methods and economies of scale, government subsidies stop. They can choose to grow beyond that, but they do so at their own risk. In summing up, Bergland urged dairy producers and cooperatives to take their industry into their own hands, dealing with surplus production and improved marketing abroad, and dealing effectively with questions on the structure of the dairy industry. “Should we continue to subsidize and encourage large scale dairy production in some states? Does it make sense? If not, what do we do about it?” Bergland urged a careful assessment of the role of market orders and federal price guarantees; and an assessment of the role of cooperatives to see what can be done to fashion a program that is “independent of the political whims of that city called the Nation’s Capital because you don’t know what’s going to happen next year. You make a committment to go in the dairy business, and you’re in for the long haul. It’s not something you can get into this week and out of next year.” “I think the dairy industry is in for hard times,” remarked Bergland, “and the only effective means of managing that is to get control over their own destiny.” Wayne Colhson vice president. Vanderwende, Marty Dickson and Levis Phipps were named direc tors. Outstanding junior members are Mike Cam, Harrington, and Linda Cook, Middletown. The Association presented ex tension dairy specialist George Haenlein with a framed photograph of the Eastbum’s cow, Aucreek Ivanho Star Gay Beauty. At 36,833 pounds of milk and 1,200 pounds of fat in 348 days’ milking, she is the highest producing cow in Delaware history. During the three-day convention, Penn sylvania Farmers Union honored three of its members for outstanding service. National President George Stone congratulates the Golden Triangle Award winners: from left, Norm Hutchinson, dairyman from Mercer Co. NOW GET MAXIMUM FEED TO MILK CONVKSION, BEST ANIMAL HEALTH AND REBREEDING, THROUGH COMPLETE CONTROL AND RECORDING OF FEED CONSUMPTION OF EACH INDIVIDUAL COW IN THE HKD AT AIL TIMES, WHETHER LACTATING OR EVEN DURING THE DRV PERIOD! IS MADE ESPECIALLY TO USE WITH THE as often as you desire. The designated amounts of "HORN OF PLENTY” DAIRY FEEDERS. Can be each ration will then be automatically dispensed used on your old magnetic “Horn of Plenty” to each cow throughout the day. feeder, or purchased with a new feeder. Many The "HORN OF PLENTY" feeder, with this other brands can also be converted over to the control unit, will deliver feed at a stow steady rate “FINGERTIP FEED CONTROL." that the cows will clean up on delivery, leaving The “FINGERTIP FEED CONTROL” system will only a few crumbs as they leave. It does not feed handle up to 499 cows, up to 32 feeders, and 2 in “dumps” as most other feeders that often rations, individual cows can be given controlled leave large amounts in the feeder, and is amounts of each- ration if desired. Amounts of recorded for one cow but eaten by another. either or both rations can be changed quickly and For Additional Information And The Location Of Your Nearest Dealer Contact: Distributors Form & Irrigation Equipment ' 100 Stover Drive, Carlisle, PA 17013 Phone (717) 249-6720 Serving Farmers Through Farm Equipment Dealers For 20 yrt. to proposed policies for 1982. One of P. r 0 rru^t Y 0? se H r l t’ the major policies they voted on s tfted. He conceded that if brand was their stand on the upcoming advertising would be a provision of milk referendum. According to referendum, it would help the Brown, PFU will be opposing the Farmers Union consider its milkerendum. And its milk support. However, as it stands, the cooperatives will be exercising the president professed PFUs right to bloc vote even though determination to defeat the PFU campaigned strongly against referendum, bloc votmg last year and its policy Other resolutions considered by still opposes it. the delegates included water * *,wn. .» Swiss' consumption is down, and HORN OF PLENTY™ Finger Tip Feed Control Cumming's & Bricker, Inc. PFU charter (Continued from Page Al) at mei .. since 1949, Cooperation Award; Jack Philson, Mercer Co. dairyman and 10-year member, Legislative Award; and Chester Reed, Tioga Co. and Eastern PFU field representative. Education Award. HORN p ROL