York Co. DHIA
(Continued from Page Dl 4)
137 A
113 A
86 A
87 A
154 A
Elvm R. Deiter
Nita
Wayne L. Sweitzer
28
Farrah
Janeen
Came
Bets
Kenneth L. Rexrolh
29 3
92 3
45 3
19 A 3
75 D 3
-23 A 3
89 D ’3
Donald Wilson
55 3
J. Donnell Taylor
Melody 3 5-4
Bupplynn Farms Farm 2
19
24
Bettyma
161
55
610
ElvmG. Molison
29
tf
46 3
77 3
105 3
75 3
22 3
122 3
121 3
124 3
Daryl L. Bair
Pansy 3
Genie 3
John D. Adams
34 3
25 3
49 3
Honeycrest Fm.
Celia 2
106 2
55 2
MervmW Hertzler
Tara 2
Red 9
f Roxanne 2
Grace 2
Daisy 3
Gary W. Thoman
27 3
17 3
Laverne & Judith Hess
23
10-2
7-3
3 4-2
3 3-5
3 2-5
Eugene B. Taylor
Bossie
Ivy
Fanny
Robert W. Mays
3 8-10
3 5-9
3 5-0
50 3 5-1
43 3 6-0
David L. & Chris Druck
70 :
Dale L. Barshmger
3 3-4
3 2-2
75
134
LOADED FROM THE BREWERY
MENCHVILLE M. SUPPLY
liliSESi
494 Menchville Road
Newport News, VA. 23602
16,738
16,664
14,660
15,983
18,150
305
305
305
304
305
3-2
3-0
2-1
2-0
l-l
21.748
305
13,888
14,774
13,883
15,697
17,262
276
305
305
283
305
9-2
5-
6-
7-2
5-10
12,861
23,548
14,523
19,793
17,738
17,961
18,207
237
305
294
297
270
305
305
7-7
5-2
4-8
3-
4-
2-10
2-11
16,469
305
14,136
289
15,989
16,877
16,945
21,023
17,263
16,612
305
303
305
305
305
305
18,320
24,018
20,918
13,280
17,274
15,907
16,402
15,556
13,777
16.544
14,683
22,978
16,223
305
305
15.388
17,011
16,932
305
305
305
285 11,881
305 14,408
284 14,188
4-10
12,831
18,336
13,413
11,114
10,809
305
*305
305
298
305
7-8
6-6
5-3
2-10
15,956
18,634
305
305
17,211
15,714
15,234
298
305
305
14,012
17,006
18,034
272
305
305
13,393
19,088
305
297
16,054
280
16,017
, 14,501
276
305
MENCHVILLE M. SUPPLY CORP.
Suppliers of Dried Brewers Grain with Dried Brewers Yeast
and Dump Trailer Hauling Available
804-877-0207
Albert Neuteid
4 3
11 3
123 3
102 0
68 3
114 3
Robt Baumgardner Jr.
4 3
7 3
562
578
535
578
539
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.0
Ruth
Jacob Brubaker
36
35
68
51
56
Charles Hess
137
140
93
97
17
54
23
88
41
Walkers Farm
414
401
Leland Stanford
94
70
Perrydell Farms
3
681
503
584
610
570
674
3.6
4.0
4.4
3.6
3.9
510
828
516
784
613
650
664
586
510
527
599
521
680
616
645
3.3
3.5
3.1
32
36
3.9
136
17
781
621
3.4
3.8
549
615
589
3.6
3.6
3.5
590
537
601
5.0
37
4,2
580
687
642
508
544
4.5
3.7
4.8
4.6
5.0
539
614
3.4
3.3
616
564
513
3.6
3.6
3.4
528
543
737
3.8
3.2
4.1
527
562
556
610
504
Crude Protein
Crude Fiber
Crude Fat
4-4
6-4
4-4
2-11
2-7
4-
5-
5-10
Saving
COLLEGE PARK, Md. - Saving
Maryland’s farmland from
development was the topic of a
recent panel discussion attended
by state and local conservation
leaders assembled for the winter
meeting of the Maryland
Association of Soil Conservation
Districts in Frederick.
Royd Smith, chairman of
Frederick County’s farmland
preservation advisory board, told
the group “in 10 years, we ail know
that food and water are going to be
given the ‘important resource
treatment’ that oil and gas are
getting now.”
Smith was one of five panel
members who explained some of
the various approaches being used
in the state to preserve farmland.
Joining him were Mark Fries, a
Frederick County planner; Alan
Musselman, coordinator for the
ANALYSIS ON 100% DRY BASIS
24%/29 1 /2%
15%/16 1 / 2 %
5%
38%
NFE
19,0/1
13,165
14,279
14,993
18,977
13,798
305
305
298
305
305
305
39
4.5
4.1
4.1
3.3
3.9
15,536
18,021
16,622
305
305
305
3.8
36
3.4
3.0
3 5
15,044
14,329
17,651
16,920
14,952
305
305
305
291
305
16,433
14,999
16,233
16,621
14,303
16,642
20,307
16,008
15,409
18,412
19,478
305
278
19,701
15,127
305
305
15,266
14,278
19,048
21,591
18,413
13,327
15,120
19,890
16,300
18,336
16,872
17,227
17,214
19,399
14,788
13,405
15,018
15.906
farmland is
Md’s
state’s Agricultural Land attended by about f» 3“
Preservation Foundation; Melvin Natives of r t inn
sss ixsz
saraw asr-ai
resource coordinator. George „ . sps =i ons
Wood, associate supervisor for the Committee
Frederick Soil Conservation Reused on the - effec* of
District, wasmoderator. hertocidesontheChe^peakeßay
Alfhnnuh thp sneakers ad- revision of design standards for
vocated different approaches
including agricultural zoning, S U f^ e M fcrn>= sehnlnrshin/erant
preservation districts, transfer of cuts ’ “ASCD s scholar^/ grant
development rights and purchase program, the t SYP V
of easements, all agreed that problem. and the of
action is needed now if agriculture Maryland s 8 P p '
is to remain a viable industry in Als ? of " *
Hip state members was Secretary Blocks
The economics of soil and water proposal to
conservation and maintaining soil and wafer p conseiwation
environmental quality were program. Me p
recurring themes throughout the resolution endorsing the State Soil
two-day meeting. The session was S general
support of his preferred program,
they opposed several features
including the reduction of federal
conservation funding, transferring
funds from current programs to be
used for state block grants, and the
formation of state and local
coordinating committees which
would supplant the role of the
state’s 24 soil conservation
districts and State Committee.
Neil Sampson, executive vice
president of the National
Association of Conservation
Districts, call the preferred
program', “an attempt by the
secretary to say that a lot more
will happen with not a whole lot
more effort.” Sampson said “in
reality we’re facing a 25 to 30
percent cut in federal conservation
program budgets. The federal
government has been decreasing
spending for conservation for a
decade.
Lancaster Farming, Saturday, January 16,1982-Dl5
759
592
589
621
624
538
Robert Buser
110 3
88 3
7 3
94 3
96 3
Rich & Steven Staner
Amy 2
Fawn Meadow Holstein
58 3
87 3
74 3
123 3
David Gemmtll
28 3
Double D. Farm
D-89 3
Ronald Stem
20 3
37 3
Dale Clymer
Nancy 3
Heather 3
Deal Holstems Farm
59 3
70 - 3
207 . 3
Jerry A. Krone
Cecile 2
Jill 2
Tom McMillen
173 3
157 3
Mcßal Dairy Farm
395 3
416 3
William Ruppert
Jennie
Joyce
Helen
Ella
Eisenhart Bros.
252
261
304
291
Wayne E. Myers
Ada
FlicKa
Maple
545
684
621
573
518
598
510
527
564
668
577
514
TO
YOUR
21,627
16,563
17,016
19,876
18,379
305
305
305
305
305'
3-1
3-
4- •
11,829
305
20,370
18,807
14,492
14,869
305
304
305
272
6-6
4-4
2-11
3-2
17,048
305
15,694
253
15,877
17,122
305
295
13,096
12,467
305
305
15,652
15,124
13,587
305
305
305
0-0
3-
4-
20,072
13,247
305
305
10-5
7-10
18,256
16,803
305
305
22,104
13,631
305
305
5-11
5-4
15,074
14,520
16,252
13,197
257
305
305
190
9-5
8-8
4-4
4-0
16,330
16,637
11,416
14,825
305
305
305
305
4-3
3-10
18,349
24,986
16,918
289
305
305
11-4
5-10
2-0
key
tssue
In other actions, MASCD
members voted to:
Support five Eastern Shore
soil conservation districts being
sued by the Land Improvement
Contractors Association;
ask the state to impose a
moratorium on sludge application
on farmland and open space until a
committee can study its long-term
effects; and
support House Bill No. 1177
establishing tax credits for
reforestation and timber stand
669
525
722
682
585
3.1
3.2
4.2
3.4
3.2
535
622
744
585
524
3.1
4.0
4.0
3.5
673
649
614
596
533
536
537
598
541
847
659
704
607
692
523
658
508
591
517
4.4
3.5
3.6
3.9
518
546
523
534
3.2
3.3
4.6
3.6
3 5 647
4.4 1095
3 8 651