1
your grass control
longer than Lasso.
WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION
~100
o
S 90
S 80
Lancaster, Pennsylvania: Surface Applied: Silt Loam Soil: 2.6% O.M.
Dual (2 pts./Acre) Lasso (5 pts./Acre)
WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION
100
U
t 90
BO
Seneca, New York; PPI: Sandy Loam Soil: 1.7% O.M.
Dual (1.5 pts./Acre) Lasso (6 pts./Acre)
WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION
~100
O 1
a 9O
oc
O
BO
ECONOMIC CONTROL LEVEL •
DUAL—i
LASSO-
Delaware County, Ohio: PPI; Silt Loam Soil: 2.3% O.M.
Dual (2 pts./Acre) Lasso (10 pts./Acre)
These graphs were taken from tests in five
states: Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York
and Maryland.
They show the results of side by side Dual
and Lasso performance over time*
Herbicide effectiveness was meas
ured by how weireach controlled
Japanese Millet, a grass highly sensitive
o these herbicides.
WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION
S 90
S 80
ECONOMIC CONTROL LEVEL
DUAL—*
LASSO-
Lake Shore, Maryland; Surface Applied: Sandy Loam 50i1:1.5%0.M.
Dual (1.5 pts./Acre) Lasso (4 pts./Acre)
WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION
~100
& 90
BO
ECONOMIC CONTROL LEVEL
dual**
LASSO -
Seneca, New York: Surface Applied: Sandy Loam Soil: 1.7% O.M.
Dual (1.5 pts./Acre) Lasso (6 pts./Acre)
WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION
100
o —i
S 90
* 80
ECONOMIC CONTROL LEVEL* \ ~
DUAL*"
LASSO-
Delaware County, Ohio: Surface Applied: Silt Loam Soil: 2.3% O.M.
Dual (2 pts./Acre) Lasso (5 pts./Acre)
In these tests. Dual lasted 4 to 6 weeks
longer than Lasso.
Ciba-Geigy, Ag. Div., Box 11422,
Greensboro, NC 27409 CIBA-GEIGY
For soybeans and com.
“Dual was applied at labeled rates and Lasso was applied at or above labeled rates
Lancaster Farming, Saturday, March 7,1981—C27
Dual.