Lancaster farming. (Lancaster, Pa., etc.) 1955-current, March 29, 1980, Image 134

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    C4€—Lancaster Farming, Saturday, March 29,1980
- ~ “ - M.*''
Pa. N.J. differ on land policies / v
WEST CHESTER The proacbes to rural land “Several bills to create ' i
neighboring states of New preservation were given in a agricultural districts have NEWVILLE The * s
Jersey and Pennsylvania workshop on Preservation been proposed,” she said. Cumberland County Ear- 1?
have conflicting viewpoints Planning Strategies. “But none of the bills are mers ’ Association held it’s {•
on how land preservation Hamill explained that the expected to be adopted. It mon thiy board meeting last
should be carried out. network of government doesn’t make any difference Thursday at the home of ri’
Representatives of the two policies in the past have been because they contain no Harold Myers Those i
states gave their divergent oriented toward growth. advantages for farmers presen t were President Sof " ’
views at the Rural “We must stop thinking in other than removing some Rodger Hoke Fred
Preservation Conference terms of managing growth,” harrassing activities of the McGillvray, Robert
held at West Chester State Hamill said. DER.” Jamison, Donald Heishman, •> ,
College last week. “We must change our Land use policies in L ee Davidson Mike
Samuel M. Hamill, Jr., policies and move away Pennsylvania, she con- Rerkheimer, Marlin Miller, I £
Executive Director of the from such policies as zoning turned, will be left largely to Harold Myers Dave Muzzy’ f j
MSM Regional Study and start thinking in terras the local municipalities. and Shirley Heishman. ’ /
Council, Inc., a principal of promoting agriculture.” “For the most part, we xhe Local Affairs Com- >
consultant to the New Jersey Two primary agricultural will need to depend on the mittee met March 4 and -
Department of Agriculture, considerations must be tried and true measures of 1 Sheldon Brymesser Monroe
offered the opinion that emphasized concerning zoning and subdivision Township Planning Com- - '
governmental policies must governmental policies on planning to implement rural nussioner and Glenn
move in new directions away land preservation, according preservation.” - Kimmel from the ASCA
from existing policies, such to Hamill. _ _ office were there to present
as zoning. The effect of such policies Keeping Hams information relating to the
Caren Glotfelty,. Chief of on agricultural profitability Refrigerate whole hams relocation of the Ap
the Division of Planning must be said, no lon ° er than 7 days palachian Trail through
Assistance, Pennsylvania along with how much they cured half hams, slices of prime farm land. ,
Department of En- encourage long-term f h h no than T he committee MTHH
vironmental Resources, said agricultural investment m d ’ Fre J h hams unanimously voted to sup
that land preservation must the future. h freezer P ort the pohcy adopted by CATTLE
be left largely to “tried and Pennsylvania has not been may be kept m the treezer h {ou J. ..
true” measures, such as very successful with farm 4 ™Zo T cthan Ciflnberland County AUTOMATICALLY
zoning. land preservation, accordmg cured hams no more than Townships effected T he
These conflicting ap- toGlotfelty. Ito 1 months. committee discussed the rj s easily placed
1 np need for aU county PFA on your receiving
4-H’ers attend Teen ssSTSfSSSr f n u r rv c »
vation efforts.m the£ local ®nd effective
townships. - * detention for
Ambassador Weekend bridges in Cumberland | treatment.
" County that are being
checked for overweight
takes for extra miles
to these bridges.
correct this problem.
4-H’ers attending a recent Teen Ambassador Weekend inlcuded (seated from Ft
left); Colleen Kinsky, Lansdale and Karen Waitemyer, Collegeville. Standing - ■ ■ |— I
from left Jeannie Underland, Philadelphia; Heidi Schempp k Lansdale; Dana || j
Trumbower, Hatboro and Mary Pat McCann of Maple Glen. . *1 l[
Cumberland Farmers
support Trail policies
The Harrisburg will be a savings of Bto
Legislature Tour has been percent on all- tires pi
changed to April 29. - chased between March
The next board meeting' and April 15.
will be held April 17 at Fred,
'McGillvray. , v -— ;
Safemark Committee Middle Age Lament
reported a meeting was held Middle age is when yoi
•March 18 and reported there P o ** ** P o3 *-'
\
TOX-O-WIK
HEADGOE
ELMER M. MARTIN
g R.D., Phone: (717) 949-2081
START WITH THE BEST!
POURED
CONCRETE
—
You get about 40% more con- \\ > IT
Crete for your dollar with a poured,
solid concrete basement as com-
pared to a hollow core block base- L. . HL. ~JL
ment. it
A poured solid concrete basement weighs about 50 lbs. more per cubic
foot! Far denser. What’s more, poured solid concrete walls are monolithic
.. .there are no joints!
This is why laboratory tests show poured, solid concrete basements
have many times the flexural and compressive strength to withstand the
side and down pressures caused by earth, wind, water and building loads
and the material density to resist water penetration.
Best of all, thanks to modern and efficient construction techniques,
poured,'"solid concrete basements are competitively priced.
Solid Concrete For:
• Manure Pit Walts • House Foundation Walls
• Hog House Wails • Silage Pit Walls
• Barnyard Walls • Cistern Walls
• Chicken House Walls • Concrete Decks
• Retaining Walls • Concrete Pit Tops
For More information On Poured Solid Concrete Walls Contact:
Balmer Bros, 410 Mam st.
Akron, Pa. 17501
CONCRETE WORK, INC.
(717) 859-2074 or (717) 733-9196 After 5 P.M.