’rfcoTnuou.T'nll . Fanning. Saturday, February 11, 1867-7 lArflfPT PQ/lf/IV'PC county and W £ TER , COS ?' S ganued. Certain legal, techni- VV CftC# 1 VCoC/C/fCCu Columbia.on the west to Ad- To se ™ icc the proposed area. cal. organizational, fiscal, and amstown and Terre Hill on (he he pio< * ect wou,d P ,on de fa- public relations aspects must cast. The population served by cihl ‘ cs ( f ° r securing Susquehan- precede implementation of the O 1 this supply belt is ejected to n . a waler ’ treat,n S ll > and de ’ Piojecl. Susquehanna River To Supply 90% have a combined daily water p " ta “ e wa ! ar ,0 all To meet each of these po- Af sh a • vw m. v demand of 75 million the system. The tential Stumbling blocks, the Of County’s Water Needs By 2010 P C1 ’ day (M.G.D.) by the* year ! ransmission mail J '™ uld ™ n stud y u, -es more detailed •• 2010. from a proposed 50 M.G.D studies, especially considering Pait IV . . . would be adequate for the next treatment plant near Marietta, that it may be as long as 20 VMM PmmnH looK ONE SOURCE generally across northern Lan- twenty years before the need ever it reeommpnrieH ’ Tb* s . tud y Points out that caster County, to New Hoi- for creating such a super wa sweeoino inth- IJill the case for servjn S the water land. It would supply water ter authority will exist, and SUMMARY The Water supply system” of ’the -ntire needs of many communities via booster pumping stations, many facts and conditions ******* study made by E. H. Sern secuin of, £ eounW £? f° the sc " ice , agencies. It is furthei recommended Harrisburg for the Lancaster Susquehanna River as the because of the age and condi- Enlarging Lancasters Susque- that associations representing County Planning Commission county’s main wate? source bv -T of ' pres€nt faci,itie3 ’ Ex- hanna facilities would make up irrigation, reciealion. sports completely assessed present the year 2010 isting water treatment facili- the balance needed. men’s and other local inter sources of water in the county ties °f aII the major water The total cost of the project, ests be formed within stream —ground water and streams; SUPER WATER AUTHORITY agencies are 25 or more years which includes further addi- basin limits Some, such as ir and it examined the capabili- By 1985, the report reepm- old ' ( - with the exception of tions to Lancaster’s Susque- rigation districts or associa tes of the 30 water supply mends a merger of, 23 of the Lancaster’* Susquehanna River hanna River facilities, is esti- Lons, may eventually evolve hgtencies in the county. rn he county’s present 30" water sup- Plant). These will require ma- mated at $23 million. Those into authorities to construct, study set two time levels when Ply agencies into a super wa- i° r modifications or complete agencies not included in the operate and maintain facilities changes would be required to ter authority. This cooperative reconstruction by about 1985, project are expected to meet within their area of mteiest, accommodate the increasing effort is termed the "Upper 4116 study-.contends. their increased 2010 demands the report concludes, water needs of the county’s Susquehanna River Water Sup- Probably-the most attractive by furthei development of ______ population 1985 and 2010 ply Project”. It would utilize features’ of the river proposal, ground water sources at an es- Bnefly, the survey showed water from the Susquehanna the authors added, is the bene- timated cost of $189,000. • Hove Yoi* Heard that the county’s streams were River, and would serve more ficial effect on future growth Planning for the Upper Sus- (Continued fiom Pa«e 11) inadequate as reliable future than 90 percent of the com- and w ell being of the area quehanna River Water Supply p rev ent falls in bathtubs -inrl water sources. It encouraged bmed 2010 water demands of served, plus development of Project should begin shortly showers bv installing «rabbars further development of ground all county water supply agen- th ® remainder of the county after 1970, the report states, an( j us ing lubber suction-type water supplies, and felt these cies. adjacent counties. and it should be accomplished bathmats. by a newly created county au- Magnetic Buttons Eas by Don Timmons <*4* /■ ly To Use Four magnetic buttons on a The authois of this extensive 12 'l nch , tape - make butt ° m , ng “‘W P™ l "™ s be ' ‘ Ch2e“' Z “ haScapped dionty can VsuaUTfSy Z- ‘" Sten theSe thonty Save time! Save on laborl / Vl - H pEEoS S. D. I Drumore Center KI 8-2116 Quarryville, Pa. MILES W. FRY & SON | Frysvi’le, Epluata R 3, Pa. 17522 !{ Tel. 354-9558 Jj Growers of: HYBRID POPLARS o good tree. PENNGIFT CROWN VETCH a faultless slope cover with good forage-crop poten tial. Certified seed and crowns available. Van Dale St 17 GIANT CAPACITY A poweiful 9 inch auger is offset within a giant, fully enclosed 12-inch steel hood. This unique design provides a reservoir for silage and feeds the full length of the feeder, greatly increasing the capacity and speed with which feed moves to the livestock. Handies the output of the largest silo unloader with case. FEEDS ENTIRE HERD AT ONE TIME Feed is angered the full length of the enclosed hood and k then automatically dumped into the feeding bunk, providing equal rations to each head of livestock at the same time. No cattle crowding No spilled and wasted feeds. When feed is dumped, the hood closes automatically and repeat* a* often as needed. SILENT, CLOG-PROOF OPERATION Powerful 9-inch auger never touches the metal hood; eliminating metal-to-metal friction and providing the right clearance to pi event binding and clogging even when mate rials have high moisture content. Horsepower requirement* are greatly reduced too. LET US GIVE YOU COMPLETE DETAILS OF TH* AMAZING VAN-DALE S-17 BUNK FEEDER CALEB M. WENGER ACITY AUTOMATIC BUNK FEEDER