4 Lancaster Farming, Saturday, December 31. 1966 From Where We Stand,.. Congratulations To A Master Farmer! We heartily applaud the recent selection of Amos H. Funk, Millersville R 1 vegetable grower, as one of this year's six Pennsylvania Master Farmers. He will receive this honor during Farm Show Week, at Harrisburg. Amos’ unselfish contributions of time and energy in serving statewide, as well as local, agricultural causes are well known. We can think of no more worthy a Lancaster County farmer to receive this recognition. Amos Funk is one of the new breed of business-minded farmers for which Lancaster County is becoming known. He has applied imagination and hard w'ork in building one of the county’s outstanding farm businesses, and has still found time to unceasingly serve his community. Our congratulations to a Master Farmer and “Master Citizen”! Tox Land According To Use, Not Location We hope that 1967 will finally be the year to bring tax equality to Penn sylvania farmers In the face of con tinually upward spiraling land values, especially in such counties as Lancaster with its increasing urban sprawl, taxing land according to use not site is the only salvation for farming. This might seem to be an impossible line to sell to the city dwellfer, but, for a variety of reasons, they’re buying it in mafty neighboring states. Last year, the Pennsylvania Farm ers’ Association proposed a constitution al amendment which was introduced in the legislature with bipartisan support. It failed to pass. It was patterned after similar- farmland tax relief legislation which.' hqs become law J -in Maryland, New Jersey and Connecticut. Maryland, which pioneered this idea in the 1950’5, assesses farmland accord ing to its value for farming, instead of its subdivision value That law has helped keep farming an important in dustry in Maryland. It had one weak ness, however, which later New Jersey and Connecticut laws avoided it neglected to properly define a farm. This led to confusion among tax assess ors, and to many needless court cases: New Jersey’s law spells out the definition sharply, only actual acreage under agricultural or horticultural use qualifies, and five acres is the minimum farm size, the land must gross an aver age of at least $5OO a year, and it must meet these requirements two successive years before applying, finally, a farmer must reapply for farmland assessment every year The savings to farmers from such a tax break are readily apparent, but what’s in it for the suburban and city folks 9 PFA cited five advantages which caused voters in Maryland, New Jersey, and Connecticut to favor such legisla tion 1 It would promote rural-urban • Futures Trading ("Continued from Page 11 Futures tiadmg was most active m soybeans, coin and wheat The volume of trading LANCASTER FARMING Lancaster County’* Own Tar'-a Weekly P O Box 2GC - Bitit?, Pi 1 754’i Ol lit. 22 10 Hun St , T.itit/, Pa 17543 Phone JO incaster 314-2047 or Bill U C2G-2111 Don Timmons, Kditor Eobcit r, Campbell, Advertising I hifarm basis. in corn was at an alltime rec ord of over 10 billion bushels; wheat with trading volume of 71 billion bushels was at the highest level since 1937; and soybeans at 16 5 billion bush els was under last year’s rec ord total, but was the second highest on record. Other commodities with rec ord trading volume included soybean meal, with over 46 million tons, and potatoes, with about 575,000 carlots. Soybean oil, at 594,000 tank cars will be about the level of the record trading in 1965. Trading volume in oats and rye was also considerably % higher in 1966 "than m 1965 Trading was also well-main tained in wool futures For the year, trading declines were registered in cotton, eggs, wool tops and cottonseed oil futures. Alex C Caldwell, CCA Ad numstrator, said that the large trading volume increases in the major commodities was stimulated by reduced sur pluses of farm commodities, increased consumption at home, and a step-up in de mand from abroad. “'Hedging by the’glair, trade in carrying and merc’nandis- Lesson for January 1,1967 employment of the church to come a social worker. He too) B«cVyr«und Scrlptur* Luke 3 1 through 4 is. believed that he had at last diauld do only what God «w>Ml im to do, nothing else, ie Acceptable Tima Some people still And thilrtrul icatlon when they are well past tat appears to be the "accepts* « time.” I recently spoke with A m who in his early forties gave a good Job as an accountant to go to seminary and become a clergyman. This, he decided, was what God really wanted him to do. Another man of my acquaint* ance has recently left thf