nfitaUUl PttISBYTBWAS GENESEE EVANGELIST. AB«llflo«aand Family ITewspnper} nt THE IHTEREST 07 THE Constitutional Presbyterian Church. EPBLIBHED EVERY THURSDAY, A.T THE PRESBYTERIAN HOUSE, 1334 Chestnut Stre< t, (2d Btory*) Philadelphia. John Hear 9, Editor and Publisher. B* Bi Hotehkin, Editor of kews and Family Bspnrtnmnts. *•?. «. P. Bush,' Correspotfdin g Edttor Boeiiester, JT. T. ftaratau Htwfoitam THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, . 1865. CONTENTS OF INSIDE PAGES. , Sxooxd Page—The Family Circle- V- *, . The Watch at the Sepnlohre—VoWhomii Mav Concern-True HonMty-|£4tOMMil,®“,ertaSS —Grandpa e Story—Ypyxjfoterag-The Tenth Com mandment-Tho Fairy Pertle^ l e l Earnest Use of Life. ,-, Y , Third Page—Miscellam^ops: " Ecamott, a ' * Sixth Page— Ptu.mglia-Oarpoc&innaiirilTiHnbiples-LilyS l —. Plymo l une^liUd! Pfj '-® l ' !3iflS ‘ iCal Me6tinK3_ Setesth Paoeh-Religious World Abroad : —MiBstena^-9 l *S oa T'*’ t^~®-ermftTly ~® unBary A DISSOLVING VIEW OF COMTE AND TEE POSITIVE PHILOSOPHY, A few.weeks ago we sketch of the (latest portrait of. Voltaire, from recent draw ings by his admirer, Thomas Carlyle. Our ' readers will remember the pitiable, humili ating, disgraceful figure presented by that once formidable foe-'* of true religion, of whom it has been said that“ without be lieving In the devil, hb saw him everywhere,, even where be was ' not/' We now take, likewise from, the delineation of a partisan and an admirer,, an almost equally humilia ting account 9/, the Coryphaeus’of modern French infidelity, M, Comte, the author of the Positive Philosophy, This Philosophy is known to'our readers as an elaborate,, 1 scientific, and in many respects, great-sys tem; in which modern ’materialismis^eii-. shrined. It has had powerful attractions for some of the ablest .mihdfs of the age ; it has found, zealous advocacy in the pages, of the it is frpm an article, in tic last nutqhef of, this peri odical, over lilies well known! initials “ J.S. M.” (John'Stuart Mill,)that we draw the whole of the. material! for this artiolev ■ ' The reviewer bakeb'his frank exhibitions of-his master’s weaYiijiss upon the later writings of Comte, and upon expositions of his system by his Frenohfollowers. In these, the Positive, .Philosophy has been carried out to its,extreme consequences. It,is ap plied as a law of life to the individual and to soqiety. It is exhibited as a system of “religious” belief and practice. The vices, the* extravagances, the measureless absur dities, and the ' deplorable degradation which it exhibits in these’developments, have shocked' many of. its' followers, and are too much ‘ Mr. Mill. Some of the worst.,of,, them indeed he defends; others he would regard as mesa exqrqsqences. We cannot perceive that he. regards the system ■from which they have*. spfung, as vitiated by them. Nor do we intend to enter into an argument upon thh relations of the sys 1 tern, as originally propounded, with theso after-thou'ghts of. its author. Enough for us to know, that materitlistio and atheistic habits of thinking have, led- the greatest and most celebrated unbeliever, of the oentury, into_ imaginations as perverse, into? doctrines as degrading, and into cohceits as frivolous and ridiculous, as . his maturer, cooler and saner'speculations are sweeping and formidable.- ■ : - ' ’ i" As to character of theman, knowing almofet nothing of L ‘it, we dispose of it first. He' -may have’ been compara tively pure in his domestiq relations, as the Frenoh estimate ,: that virtue r It appears, however, that he, separated from his wifej. and that hsuwa&Hihe subject of an intense ; affection for the .wife of another man, infi prisoned a,s a felon. This latter attach- we are obligingly informed by Mr. Mill, “ always rCndaine'd. pure,” although' “ it gave him a year of passionate .enjoy ment,” .. We are further informed that this intimaoyif gave him an insight , into the true ’ souroes, of human happiness- which' changed his: whole conception of life.” This may all pass'in an atmosphere tainted by the low morality of the Frenoh nation ; but we are surprised at the matter of course way in whioh it is .treated in' an English periodical. As to the philosopher himself, if an unlawful love was needed to crown and consummate his character, we -are net to blame for suspecting rottenness at the core. Comte with. his Clothilde, and Vol taire with his “ divine Emilie,” are not too far apart to illustrate each other's character. Passing now to 1 the political application of Comte’s-'philosophy, we find that he hates and despises parliamentary and rep resentative governments, and that he would have the yrhole world under the absolute sway of three Dictators, and one functiona , fry, whom he calls High Priest, or Head Pon tiff of the hutnan race. All the: rmental and'‘scientific* activity of manj he'teaohes, should be controlled by law. The' -studies be pursued should be laid down; a' prob lem should he assigned, upon which exclu sively the whole attention of- thinkere should be concentrated .until it was .solved i.' " •• -- r ' I"* -yew Series, V Q i. XI, N6.-:&Q.[ ; ! or pronounced insoluble, when it shoul# be; and another substituted for it. : All studies not contributing positively to the public welfare are to be forbidden as idle and useless. The greater part of all the sciences, and especially of astronomy he puts under this condemnation. Selecting, about one hundred volumes of those now extant, he would/in the spirit of the Sara-' cen conqueror at Alexandria,commit all the rest to the flames. We do not hear that the Bible is among the hundred to be ex empt. This, says Mr. Mill, (whose works, would-doubtless go into the bonfire) is’even worse than the early Christians who only , burned, the books of their enemies. It is “the one thing,,in M. Comte’s.< projects which merits real ;itidignatio'n." r He would have every race and species of animals and plants not useful to man extirpated. Mv Comte would banish faith 'in ■ the. supernatural; he scorn the idea of accepting a revelation by faith; his- follow ers cannot abide the method of some * bet lievers, who substitute appeals to faith for : proofs. But the author, .of the Positive Philosophy, fondly imagining that he has reached ultimate truth, ( demands’ tliat his conclusions be received .without reasoning, that is by faith. He inyeighsj against the demand for proof so loudly heard, and in the State,whiohhb foresees ,-isfto arise upon, the universal Acceptance' -Of hib systein, the youth are to be’ttoined to a knowledge of its lfetdiDg principlfes, Which they are to re-‘ ceive with absolute unquestioning acquies cence. Does any Christian parent reqjiirb more of his child ,in teaching it the .Bible ? , Comte,. making no claim to ,supernatural guidance, which his. system totally, excludes, demands for, his , .teachings :i a regard which he ridicules men for according .to teachings which they believe to be divine-! ( His projeetfof regulating the intellectual activity of mop is as as 'any actually known’ to the-.dark ages. , His great anxiety is . lest people ; pjbould., reason land seek'to knoyr. more than enough. . The Positive; Philosophy . is discovered—-how foolish for men to -wish for -more! He even lays down, laws prescribing the proper., number'Of chapters in' ever y treatise, and< of cantos in eyery poem. ; He insists that the minitnun length -of a sentence 1 is 250 letters! And to cap the' climax bf’ this mania for regulation, he has a fantastic and elaborate arrangement, by which each sec tion of a work must be made to begin with a •certain letter of. the alphabet determined be forehand,, the letters being seleoted so as to compose words having a ■“'synthetic ! or. sympathetic significance,” and as close: a; relation' as possible to the section or part to which they are appropriated. And all this is not put forth as mere opinion, but laid down as law,,fo be enforced in the era'which' the writer confidently 1 expepted, of the universal prevalence ofjhe Positive ,Phil osophy. i But tho worst is to come. The, most irreligious, atheistic and intensely worldly of modern s systems, which denies. God, im-; mortality, supernatural objects, sin, revela tionj Christ, everything but - man,'"nature and science', :’ahd c onlythe phenomenal, hot’ theessentialjin theseobjecfcs,has undertaken' to be religious! And Mr/ 'Mill undertakes to show that religion and atheisin are not incompatible;: and he puts this atheistie t caricature of religion in . disparaging bon-; trast with;',' the conception of .human; nature, as incapable of giving itadove and .devoting itsVexistenoe to ;4ny otfjeot whioh eannot. afford in exohahge ah eternity of personal' eDj oymfe'nt,’ ’ a' m&s6 : unwbrthy' Shd quate account of' evangelical piety; whibh we need to comment on no further just now, than to point out where Mr. Mill’s prefer ences, evidently lie. Let us however turn to: this new fangled religion, which boasted tohave sprung from a negation of all ’the fundamentals’of true religion. It is, ip brief, a rehabilitation of the lowest forms of heathenism—man-wor ship and fetish worship. M. Comte’s lead- ing historical axiom in regard to the pro gress of human thought, is that the theologi cal fonn of conception is the lowest, the me taphysical higher and more recent, and the latest and'highest development is the Posi tive-Philosophy.’ Yet:this last issue of the human intellect grovels among the meanest and basest forms of that era which’it de clares to be lowest of all. The first and leading object of worship prescribed by ; Comte is man. And this worship is not sim ply the high, devout and self-denying: re gard for human welfare which Mill defends as! truly religious, and which is indeed a beau tiful and honorable feature of the Positive Philosophy ; it is actual adoration specifically prescribed, and regulated as minutely as in any monkish ritual. The Human Race ac cording to Comte, is. strictly and properly .an iOhjeot of devout, meditation ami prayer.' fit ia the> Grayd, %e i|reatTßeing. PIIILADELPHIxt. THLKSDAV,. BEITOIIiKR 28. 1865. And not only is “the race, as a thus put in place of God, but ofjone’s own family, particularly the wife, the daughter, living c designated as among the*new Positive Era. In other words,; n improved form of Chinese worship is to )e-the acme of civilized religion; Or, are we not- re minded of the loathsome and 1 lasphemous demonstrations of the French I revolution, j when an abandoned woman wai drawn in i triumph through the streets of Paris, and hailed as the goddess of the new era, and ,when Christian . churches were profaned ,by the, vileideeds which: shock; us when narra ted even'Of "heathen.'temples ? ;Suoh ;an -is&'tte might not’ have ; been expected'byj Qomte, but the worship of - ’ woman in a 1 so 'diety fro& whidh all regard tor Odd is ex cluded .must .inevitably lead to it. . There_ ishoyrever a lower .deep,in this gulf of revived heathenism,-pf whioh? we shall speak in our next. THE AMERICAN PRESBYTERIAN FOR our ,paper is, steadily on the increase. New fields, are opening to us in various parts of the country, 1 and our friends upon old fields are . preparing .to re n'ew their efforts - to increase our list. We cannot but believe that thedecided action taken on two occasions by the last General Assemble ’ on the religious press, was an of increased regard among our ministry and people for this important ad junct of pastoral and evangelical effort; and that they are better prepared than ever to take s the advice' of, the Assembly ion- the! SfibjeSt.- v;t if.;,; ::i d Lf peace Is not a frank and honest aeknow? ledgipent of wroug.done, and .the avpwat of Sfpurppsq tq ; wpid a iyn. the;future |-i}, 1 1 > ; { The; Times has gpt ihJp i: th e ;'Vbriest; i shal lows and . mud-flats, undertook, to sustain, ! ;tbrbhgh< 'thick- i anff thin, MrV'Johhson’S lamehtable'and l danger-' ous policy of CQnoessioii to'rebels!' - 'But in the • • following' paragraph' it reaches, ’we think, the' climax * 6f r Weakn'ess ’ahd con fusion: f : .. ,h.I ViJ .... i*!L '- J Jf-Vj x. ’ ' Again,- some distinction must be madb.be-: tween a phlitibal’andiborarQffencei."'The onp' may come fi-om’ari erfor bf the head simply ;' -the other -must proceed, if its. author is sane,- from badness of .hearty The one may be poms mitted.conscientiously; .;thfe other cannot! ...A, rebbl'inay mean to 'do' right; a thief or mur derer : 'cannot. A Christian- minister of the 'North would! not dare to withhold spiritual; consolation from a dying Southerner,,simply’ for failing;to express repentance for support ing the Confederacy; and yet he would give hb such consolation to an unrepentant thief or murderer. The assumption that every man gf the ax millions who have participated in this rebellion acted against his conviotions of duty,'and voluntarily committed what he knew to be a crime, is monstrous. It would prove a vmoral, depravity .in! the Southern people beyond . anything, known to human history—a depravity which would as much forlnd us to have political as religious asso ciations with them: “Were it true, it would eternal disgrace .to. restore them to American citizenship. Nobody; , believes it. The :great body of the Southern people who sustained the Confederacy did so on honest, though, as we say, mistaken ; conviotions of ■duty: -. it is.beeause we. have this'belief that • they aj§ freely welcomed back to 'the. Union. What is'there iu felipous , principle , thp,t dis ’allows'a similar 'recognition, ; and beffeSpond-' ing action ? What is there that-requires the churches to be more implacable and relent :less toward a the government : than .is, the .government itself? Cannot Christian charity yield, as much 1 as political justice? : .f . <■: ’ It is a long time since we have seen brooded into the same space so many crude and erroneous views, such'manifest miseon ception, such confused and loose notions on the . most vital subj eots. ? “ Some distinction Evangelist, lOlO -erfesfeie must be made,” says this self-constituted teacher of the loyal churches, “between a political and moral offence.” As if politi cal offences were never also moral ones! As if the. thirteenth chapter, of Romans had never been -written, ,or the Bible every where, did not inculcate obedience to the regularly constituted authorities . of' the State! As if Mr. j ohnson himselfdid hot deolare,.though we fear, like : Mr/Ilaymohdj he has found it convenient to forgetthe sentiment, that treason is a crime aiid must be, punished! As if it needed any argu ment to prove that an unjustifiable pro alaverjr rebellion,. against ,« peaceable and j.ust Government was the greatest of crimes! 4-political offence, proceeds our ; moralist, i may he .committed conscientiously, a moral offence; cannot.' , But how'about that Sw edish priest who poisoned the communion jwine j and destroyed the' ‘lives of his parish ioners j that was'amoral offence j yet he de clared he did it conscientiously to release f fhem from their hopeless, poverty. Saul the persecutor, verily thought he ought to .do many things contrary to the name of rhesus, yet he; counted himself- the .chief of Sinners, and regarded,his - ,forgiveness, as a miracle of grade; Oonscientiousttess ! Is there a crime in the catalogue ftir wliieh .this has not' Beenpleadin extenuation 1 not Philip ‘IT of Spmn 'conSisientibtid'iu his relentless and bloody policy to the revolted Netherlands ?• Has. not every persecutor and inquisitor plead conscience in justifica tion of. his, .cruelties ?. jWould pot.. Lotus Napoleontell you, he was consoientious in usurping the imperial power in France? and in all the puhlio add secret massacres which ■ were necessary to remove impediments from hiB ; path ? Is there ' ‘a’ single pernicious in all the' history of err6r which has noi l been held oOnsoientiously ? Were not the. .leaders of .public opinion in' the churches of the South conscientious in' maintaining the saerednessj excellence: and divinity of American slavery? And: is thbir opinion a whit }Css noxious: andt less necessary to he repented of, and not rather much more so, on that very account? We. have not a. doubt that there have been a con siderable number of conscientious rebels and iproj-slavery men in the South.. Bui has there been, in all the hiatory of opinion, a .delu sion more gross, and a great ,practical error leSs excusable than consoientious pro-slave "ryism iandi: rebellion in this free country, and in the middle of the nineteenth centm, ry? And should not any professedly' loyal editor hang" bis head for shame at the thought of ‘ lecthring men who; would simply preserve the Christian church from a contaminating comptomise with it! Or Would the. Times he understood as requiring the churches to open their doors to all, of whatever shade of. opinion or peculiarity of practice, who professed a conscientious attachment to those opinions and praotices. ? Or does it understand iwhat it wants ? '6 ’As to the l great mass of .the six million fChels, it is most absifrd to speak of con science being concerned in the matter. The rebellion was a frenzy in its origin. The truth ‘is briefly put in 'the; phrase about “firingthe Spiffhern heart.” It was un thinking, unppntrpljable passion with the masses,,andcpnscienee was neither oonsiilt ed, nor listened to, nor thought of-.- “ The greet body of the Southern people who ‘sustained the Confederacy” had ho convic-; tious, honestordishon'Cst about it.- “Duty** Was i very unimportant idea 1 in the con siderations which prompted and which sus tained thp moyement. The South was in toxicated with one of those wild.drcamh of .independence which seize- upon- restless men; it jyas drunk with tie arroganeeof the plantation; it dreaded the advance of those pregnant ideas ofliberty and eqnality which were incompatible with the barbarism of property in man, and it flew to arms in obedience to these; mere instincts, which a few half-crazy philosophers and theolo gians undertook to .elevate into convictions and to justify as Such. The truth'is, there .was . not a little conscience in the South ..about the commencement of the rebellion, ■but it was largely the other way. The rebel Vice Presidentwas, doubtless, honest in his~conviotions to the very last moment, (and later, too, we imagine,) 1 that the rebel lion was unjustifiable. And the Times , of course, knows of a certain rebel General Lee, who expressed the same . convictions at the opening of the movement, but who in spite of'them, and in spite of his solemn 03th ,as a United States offioer, and of his position on Gen. .Scott’sistaff, followed “his State,” and became the main prop of the conspiracy, which his conscience had con demned; for four-years! As to the questions with which the para graph ends, a moment’s thought will show that the position of the secular government and of th W!ere' stricken from the folk for disloyalty'. ' The politicians' may take their course ' They may prate about.conscience, ,aqd,.we must bear with their oonfiision of ideas on a subject, with which,; especially since the lamented death of out praying, honest-souled, President, Lincoln,“they evi ..dqntly.. have little practical acquaintance. So much greater the need that the churches 'abide'iifmly by their declared p&My of treating rebellion in .the light of the New Testament, and of requiring repentance, above all, for the sin of sustaining a man stealing, - anti-republican, 1 prison-starving rebellion like this. .Their position,, firmly maintained,' niay becomethevery'palladium of ! our. Bepublic. Even the ‘ New ’ York Times may see the day when it will ' thank ns for it. RULING ELDERS AMONG HOTTEN- TOTS. It has been supposed by many intel ligent persons that complete, organi zation of Churches! out of recently converted heathen was impos ; sible on account of: the lack of suitable materials, for the eldership. And- the proposal tp establish the entire machinery pf an Evangelical Church, early, among heathen converts, has been treated by some active, (friends of missions as vision ary, and an excuse has been made for tolerating a very loose form of Church government on the mission fields, oh the same .general ground of. native incompe tence and.unfitness. The following ac count of the office-bearers in the Presby terian churches of .Caffraria, communicat ed by Rev. John A. Chalmers to. the Unit ed Presbyterian Record for September, will give some light on the snbj^bt: “These elders of our church are a noble b'andpf side by side they]' ptand with us,. end.9aypring.to stem the,mighty torrent ;of eyil with, which, we have to contend... have passed Wkny trials; . they have been. driven .hither and thither bythq,desolating’ blast pf war,. and still they stand, firm pi their profession.: They have JsePU : inel|owed the, trials and > dangers through which they have passed ; singleThanded, our fathers, ,so far as human aid is con cerned, fought these battles; but we have trophies of their conquests, and though these elders have not received .ppr.adyantiages, yet we cannot hut look .them in ;an emergency. for their counsel, as their experience is .greater than ours. .Their names kje household Words; and the ,future, historian, if such there be of our chequered Caffre mission, will not only recount the trials and deeds of the missionaries, but also those of the elders, for their acts are interwoven with ours. . , “Such an one truly is Bacela, to whom I introduce you, who is well wor thy of the important sphere in which he is laboring. Well do I remember, years ago, at the Chumie, when I was but a mere ( child, seeing, him a full-grown, man, sitting in the same class with little boys, learning eagerly tp read his Testament: he thought it not a degradation of his manhood to sit with children and learn to spell the words of Divine truth. His teacher, Pella, whose name is well known, has long ago gone to his rest. His whole demeanor is .an appropriate illustration of the words, ‘ Diligent,in business, fervent in spirit, serving the Lord.' He is one of those unassuming, modest men, who gain upon one the more you come in con tact with him. He is man of a kind, generous, charitable disposition; a peace maker, who wins the hearts of others by words of kindness and affection. ; ' Surj rounded by a class of hard-hearted ens, who have long stood.out against the. gospel, he has yet gaine'd far Himself a vast influence in that district vyhere he is located.” •" ‘ •