Page 10
ti)
t
•
, 1 ,, •
' r
***************************************-V--49-*******
The Senator Speaks
Let me introduce myself. My name is
Senator Hymie Quanotnepratz. I am a
Senator for the people and I shall use
this column to enlighten my constituents
of problems or faults found in the Capitol
Camnnq environment.
My first issue to deal with will be
everyone's favorite columnist to hate,
namely one Ron Alexander Muck. It
seems that this person, male or female,
has stirred up some dissention among
the constituants. I agree whole hearted
ly that they should remain anonymous.
However, I for one found out the identity
without even so much as a little bit of
effort. If you wish to remain anonymous,
"Ron", I think you should be a bit more
discrete.
Admitting to anyone who approaches
you that you are indeed this "Run
Amock" is not what I would call brilliant.
No offense, but it was just plain moronic.
About your column being buried on page
four, it seems to be the consensus of
most that it should've been buried a little
deeper. My opinion is that maybe it
should've been edited completely.
To continue in an effort to make you
realize how immature and despotic your
comments are and maybe let you be
enlightened enough to know when you
have gone too far (sic). Dorm beat, it
seems you don't have much to say about
the dorms that could even be miscon
strued as constructive criticism. You
wrote about the "Zoo" on third floor
Wrisberg -- could be that the so-called
"Zoo" is the brunt of your ignorance. It
is Sponsoring
Dinner for two at BEEF STEAK CHARLIE'S!
Just $l.OO, sold in the Main Lobby. (Jan. 25-30)
CHI-RHO
A trip to ATLANTIC CITY for two!
Take a chance on a raffle ticket.
turns out that the "Zoo" has not been
defeated in an athletic contest yet this
year. Could it be that your appraisal of
beer drinkers is biased? You seem to
totally neglect the good side of the
"Zoo't. I mean they might have gotten
their nickname by the way they break
physical and mental tension. Since your
anonymity is revealed to me I believe
that a large part of your remarks
directed towards the "Zoo" are based on
jealousy. But don't worry, we won't
compare your body to that endangered
mammal, the sperm whale. By the way,
there are a lot of girls attracted to
athletic type guys, obviously in your
case it is not vice versa. Don't worry,
there is still hope, or should we say
plenty of tuna in the sea.
In describing second floor Wrisberg I
seem to note an ambiguity. Aren't you
being a little hypocritical when you say
more power to those guys for partying
right after you just put down the third
floor for partying? It seems that you
prefer second floor's way of drinking
without limit to third floor's method of
unlimited drinking. At least try and be
consistant in your bias
First floor Wrisberg is a quiet place
because that is what the multitudes on
that floor desire. Also with constant
awareness of both a Resident Assistant
and an Assistant Coordinator being
present, what would you be doing
different? Running up and down the
halls yelling fire -- is that what you mean
by something exciting to do at 3:00 a.m.?
I'll bet, if given a choice, girls would like
Thursday, January 28, 1982
a, mature, quiet floor over a rowdy floor.
How many men are attracted to beer
guzzling girls? But in any event, is it
your right to judge them?
In your description of first floor
Church you use adjectives that seem a
little unfair. One thing that is apparent
is that obviously you consider yourself to
fall into that category of normal human
company. Isn't this an assumption on
your part? I don't really think the guys
on first floor Church are as bad as you
present them to be -- it's just that they
react to you like Captain Ahab did to
Moby Dick. They seem to have formed
an opinion of you that isn't exactly
complimentary -- in fact it is down right
degrading. A floor does not form an
opinion of someone like that unless there
is just cause, and from what I've heard,
they have just cause. The two individu
als to which you refer, Cheech & Chong,
have been known to attract the women
to their room. But in all honesty I don't
think it is their good looks: it could be
the aroma from the room that draws
them. This could be similar to the smell
on the third floor during the World
Series. But, since you have been
observed, to use your term "flocking to
their room", may we postulate that you
are a user of those funny cigareetes?
Concerning you efforts to expose the
second floor girls who make the best of a
lonely situation here at C.C., I would
venture to say that you are no Rona
Barret, so why turn your column into a
gossip corner? That is in bad taste, but
that only proves what is fast becoming
common knowledge.
In reg. 2aph con
cerning a gin I think
that that kind of nortoriety is uncalled
for, since it was none of your damn
business. That kind of material or news
has no purpose for being in a column. By
the way, did you get the permission of
the R.A. and Assistant Coordinator to
use their names in your article?
In reference to your last paragraph, I
think that if your column were directed
towards this type of exposure instead of
the "Muck" you have been producing,
you would earn more respect than
contempt. Think about it!
I agree that some of the comments
directed towards you by me have been
abusive, but until the shoe is on the
other foot or recieving the brunt of the
uncomplimentary remarks, it really does
not sink in. Now that you have felt a
small amount of what the other floors
have been feeling, maybe you will realize
the error of your ways. I hope so! It
would be a waste to lose you as an
author, but the way you are now is of the
sort we don't need.
Respectfully submitted,
Senator Hymie Quanatnepratz
P.S. Another hint in your journalistic
style could be to be a little more
objective in your reporting of campus
social events. There is no need to insult
valient efforts in the combatting of
boredom.
C.C. Reader