ter time, but very dangerous if paflaule at ail, as some tides flow it two feet and more ; I pall ed it last March in this situation : This incon venience however will be avoided by palling through Exeter—and no part ot that route is lo bad in the winter time as this caufway ; 1 have heretofore travelled in the winter time through Xenfin«non and Exeter on being advil'ed ic was the belt road of the two ; and tliough there was much snow on the ground we found no anlicul ty in getting along—Hence, fir, 'tis evident to me that the mail may easily be carried from iiol ton, through Exeter to Fortfmouth 111 a day — and that the objetfion founded on the increale of distance is a mere pretence, originating m an tinwillingnefs, in the minds ot some people, iliac the mail flyiuld arrive an hour or two looner at Exeter than Portsmouth. . . The gentleman (Mr. Livermore) has laid it is a principle of the bill, that the mail shall be carried in the molt direct road from place to place, and that it will be a deviation from this principle to go through Exeter: 1 his, lir, is not ftridtly true—no such principle has been ad hered to but in a qualified sense ; and it has been departed from whenever it would accom date any considerable number of people. 1 willi here to remind the Houle of Springfield in Mas sachusetts—and Middleton, in Connecticut ; in the former inllance the direct route from Wor celter to Hartford is not through Springfield ; but a deviation of near ten miles is made to ac commodate that town : and in palling from Hart ford to New-Haven a deviation ot tour or five miles (if I am mistaken, gentlemen from that State will corredt me) is made for the purpole of accommodatingthe town of Middletown ; ma ny other instances of this nature might be ad duced—and why lliall not a small deviation be now made in favor of Exeter, especially since no inconvenience will result therefrom to Ports mouth ! 1 can fee no real'on. In order to convince ihis House that the mail, an paffiug from Boston to Portsmouth, ought not to be carried through "Exeter, the gentleman has read a Jetter frem the Polt-Mafter at Portsmouth, slating the number of letters that pass in a year, by a cross pott, to Exeter ; by which it appears the number indeed is very small. Hence he would draw an argument that the bu siness between Boston and Exeter is trifling, and not of confeqnence enough to juftify so small a deviation in the mail line of three or four—or, as the gentleman contends, of five miles. But, Mr. Speaker, this is strange logic ! and a very different conclusion results in my mind from the contents of the letter. The letter may be evi 'dence how little business is carried on between Portsmouth and Exeter, and that consequently there is no reail need of a port between thefetwo places—but it does not contain she shadow of evidence that there is no commercial business be tween Boston and other places in Maflachufetts and Exeter. If a gentleman in those places wish ed to write to Exeter, he would never think of putting his letter into the Portsmouth mail—he inuft know that ii is liable to lay fix days in the poft-ofKce at Portsmouth, and perhaps longer— while various opportunities, by a private con veyance, would pjrefent within that time. I have hitherti? admitted the additional dis tance, by going through Exeter, to be five miles —b«t, fir, fitice the\jnail ttage pafles Merrimack river, about four miles above the old ferry (the gentlemen of the house acquainted with that part of the country know the places I refer to) I can not agree that this additional dittance will be more than three miles, if so much. But, howe ver this may be, I trust I have (hewn to thefatif fa