The motion for the committee's rlffiigwas ne gatived. The motion for striking out of the proposed amendment the words " by and with the advjct and conlent of the senate," was put and c:i -^ j d in the affirmative. The question then v.-as, on the propose.l unend irienf wjriioac the vvoi Js ,'byand wirh rfte advice s»iui of the fenate/' the vote - l jrtng taken the amendment was not adopred. Mr. Lavvrance propoled an additional claufefor limitting the duration of the bill to the term of three years, and from thence to the end of the next fellion of Congress thereafter. It was moved that the clause which enjoins that the accounts of expenditures be rendered un der oath, should be struck out. Mr. Sedgwick was in favor of retaining the •words ;—there could no injury arise from their being retained in the bill ; they may conduce to the public fatisfaiftion.—ln the disposition of pub lic monies, cases will frequently occur in which a confidence in the integrity of public of ficers, may be all the fatisfad:ion the people may receive in the disposal of their money. It is not to be expetfted that the formality of an oath is to be attended to, the idea meant to be convey ed is that the accounts are rendered under the imprelfion of such a solemnity. Mr. Huntington, Mr. Wadfworth and Mr. Ames were severally in favor of the motion for striking out the words.—lt was observed that they involved an absurdity, except gentlemen supposed it neceflary that the President should take his oath of office de novo. The words refpedling the oath were struck out. A motion of Mr. Madison's, that the President cause a regular statement of the account of ex penditures to be laid before Congress, occasioned some further conversation—This motion was a dopted. The whole paragraph as thus amended, was then agreed to. The motion' for the limitation of the bill was next difcufled—lt was moved that three be struck out before " years" and two inserted—This mo tion obtained. The clause thus amended was adopted The committee then rose reported the bill with amendments—to which the House acceded—and ordered that the bill be engrofled for a third read ing to-morrow. Mr. Lee called the attention of the House to the petition of Mr.Dobbyn—and after fomeobfer vations on the policy of encouraging the emigra tion of foreigners, and the population of the un appropriated territory of the United States,mov ed that the petition of Mr. Dobbyn be referred to the Secretary of the Treasury—that he may make provision in the plan which he is directed to report to the House, for cases similar to that of the petitioner—Mr. Madison and Mr. Page supported this motion. Mr. Sherman moved that the latter part of the motion should be (truck out, and that if the pe tition is referred to the Secretary of the Treasu ry, it fliould be by way of information. It was said that there is an impropriety in re straining the Secretary to any particular objef a former motion he had ottered upon this fubjeft—He made a aiftinftion between « Prorogation and Adjournment in England : The firft was the <{ ast of the fir ft Magistrate, the King, and all unfinifhed business " wai difinilTed by it. But on the last, which was fomc times the " concurrent aftof the several branches of the Legiflatuie, at other " times the ast of one or both Houses of Parliament, the business